Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:21:24.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Identification of Sources of Chert Artifacts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Barbara E. Luedtke
Barbara E. Luedtke*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA 02125
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trace element analysis is a widely used procedure for determining the original source of archaeological materials. Although many articles have discussed analytical procedures and archaeological applications of the results, comparatively little attention has been given to the intermediate step of determining the appropriate procedure for assigning an artifact to a source once the trace element composition of both is known. This paper discusses several different procedures for assigning artifacts to sources and compares these procedures on the basis of their accuracy and the types of identification errors they make. Special attention is paid to discriminant analysis, which appears to be the best procedure for identifying sources of chert artifacts.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , October 1979 , pp. 744 - 757
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Binns, R. A., and McBryde, I. 1969 Preliminary report on a penological study of ground-edge artefacts from north-eastern New South Wales, Australia. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 35(10):229–235.Google Scholar
Chappell, J., and Strathern, M. 1966 Stone axe factories in the highlands of east New Guinea. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 32(5):96–121.Google Scholar
Cressman, E. R. 1962 Data of geochemistry, nondetrital silicious sediments. United States Geo Jogicai Survey Professional Papers 440-T.Google Scholar
Davis, John C. 1973 Statistics and data analysis in geology. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. E., Cann, R. R., and Renfrew, C. 1968 Obsidian and the origins of trade. Scientific American 218:38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Olive J., and Varady, Paul D. 1966 Probabilities of correct classification in discriminant analysis. Biometrics 22:908–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. B., and Gordus, A. A., and Wright, G. A. 1969 Identification of the sources of Hopewellian obsidian in the Middle West. American Antiquity 34:1-14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kowalski, B. R., Schatzki, T. F., and Stross, F. H. 1972 Classification of archaeological artifacts by applying pattern recognition to trace element data. Analytical Chemistry 44:2176–2180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luedtke, Barbara E. 1976 Lithic materia] distributions and interaction patterns during the Late Woodland period in Michigan. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Michigan. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Luedtke, Barbara E. 1978 Chert sources and trace element analysis. American Antiquity 43:413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, J. Thomas, and De Nies, Mark 1972 LONGTERM and PEAKSCAN: neutron activation analysis computer programs. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan Technical Reports 2.Google Scholar
Sieveking, G. de G., Bush, P., Ferguson, J., Craddock, P. T., Hughes, M. J., and Cowell, M. R. 1972 Prehistoric flint mines and their identification as sources of raw material. Archaeometry 14(2):151–176.Google Scholar
Sigleo, Anne C. 1975 Turquoise mine and artifact correlation for Snaketown Site, Arizona. Science 189:459–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sneath, Peter H. A., and Sokal, Robert R. 1973 Numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
Weigand, Phil C, Harbottle, German, and Sayre, Edward V. 1977 Turquoise sources and source analysis: Mesoamerica and the southwestern U. S. A. In Exchange systemsin prehistory, edited by Earle, Timothy K. and Ericson, Jonathon E., pp. 15–34. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Whallon, Robert J. Jr. 1972 A new approach to pottery typology. American Antiquity 37:13–33.Google Scholar
Wray, Charles F. 1948 Varieties and sources of flint found in New York State. Pennsylvania Archaeologist 18:25–45.Google Scholar
Wright, Gary A. 1967 The study of chert sources and distributions by neutron activation analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Ann Arbor. Google Scholar