Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:04:37.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

History, Monumentality, and Interaction in the Appalachian Summit Middle Woodland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Alice P. Wright
Alice P. Wright*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Appalachian State University, ASU Box 32016, Boone, NC 28608-2016 ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Middle Woodland period in eastern North America witnessed a florescence of monumental architecture and material exchange linked to widespread networks of ritual interaction. Although these networks encompassed large geographic areas and persisted for several centuries, extant archaeological models have tended to characterize Middle Woodland interaction as an historically unitary process. Using new data from the Garden Creek site in North Carolina, I argue that these frameworks obscure important historical shifts in Middle Woodland interaction. Recent collections-based research, geophysical survey, targeted excavation, and 14C dating (including Bayesian modeling) of this site reveal two coeval diachronic changes: a shift from geometric earthwork construction to platform mound construction; and a shift from the production of special artifacts {mica, crystal quartz) to the consumption of exotic artifacts in association with platform mound ceremonialism. These data hint at important changes in interregional relationships between the Appalachian Summit, the Hopewellian Midwest, and the greater Southeast during the Middle Woodland period, and provide a springboard for considering how processes of culture contact contributed to precolumbian cultural change.

Resumen

Resumen

Durante el periodo Middle Woodland, la region este de América del norte experimentó una florescencia de arquitectura monumental e intercambio que fueron conectados a redes extensivos de interacción ritual. Aunque estas redes cruzaron regiones geográficas grandes y persistieron por varios siglos, modelos arqueológicos existentes han caracterizado interacciones Middle Woodland como un proceso histórico y unitario. Usando información nueva coleccionada del sitio de Garden Creek en North Carolina, argumento que estos modelos ocultan cambios importantes e históricos en las interacciones de la época Middle Woodland. Investigaciones recientes que utilizan colecciones, técnicas [prospección] geofísicas, excavación, y datos radio-carbónicos del sitio de Garden Creek revelan dos cambios contemporáneos y diacrónicos: el cambio de la construcción de montículos [de tierra] geométricos a la construcción de montículos plataformas; y un cambio de la producción de artefactos preciosos (mica, cuarzo) al consumo de artefactos exóticos relacionados con ceremonialismo de montículos plataformas. Esta información indica que existieron cambios importantes en las relaciones interregionales entre el Sumo Appalachian, el medio-oeste Hopewellian, y la mayoría del sureste durante la época Middle Woodland, y ofrezcan una punto de partida para la consideración de procesos de contacto entre culturas y su contribución a cambios en tiempos precolombinos.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 79 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 277 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Alt, Susan M. 2006 The Power of Diversity: The Roles of Migration and Hybridity in Culture Change. In Leadership and Polity in Mississippian Society, edited by Brian M. Butler and Paul D. Welch, pp. 289–308. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Anderson, David G. 1998 Swift Creek in Regional Perspective. In A World Engraved: Archaeology of the Swift Creek Culture, edited by Mark W. Williams and Daniel T. Elliott, pp. 274–300. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Anderson, David G. 2013 Social Landscapes of the Early and Middle Woodland Southeast. In Early and Middle Woodland Landscapes of the Southeast, edited by Alice P. Wright and Edward R. Henry, pp. 247–262. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Anderson, David G., and Mainfort, Robert C. Jr. 2002 An Introduction to Woodland Archaeology in the Southeast. In The Woodland Southeast, edited by David G. Anderson and Robert C. Mainfort, Jr., pp. 1–19. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Bayliss, Alex 2009 Rolling Out Revolution: Using Radiocarbon Dating in Archaeology. Radiocarbon 51:123–147 Google Scholar
Beck, Robin A. Jr., Bolender, Douglas J., Brown, James A., and Earle, Timothy K. 2007 Eventful Archaeology: The Place of Space in Structural Transformation. Current Anthropology 48: 833–860.Google Scholar
Braun, David P. 1986 Midwestern Hopewellian Exchange and Supralocal Interaction. In Peer Polity Interaction and Socio-Political Change, edited by Colin Renfrew and John F. Cherry, pp. 117–126. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, Christopher 2009 Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates. Radiocarbon 51:337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brose, David S., and Greber, N’omi B. 1979 Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Conference. Kent State University Press, Ohio.Google Scholar
Burks, Jarrod, and Cook, Robert A. 2011 Beyond Squier and Davis: Rediscovering Ohio’s Earthworks Using Geophysical Remote Sensing. American Antiquity 76:667–689.Google Scholar
Byers, A. Martin 2004 The Ohio Hopewell Episode: Paradigm Lost, Paradigm Gained. University of Akron Press, Ohio.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Joseph R. 1964 Interaction Spheres in Prehistory. In Hopewellian Studies, edited by Joseph R. Caldwell and Robert L. Hall, pp. 133–143. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Carr, Christopher 2006 Rethinking Interregional Hopewellian “Interaction.” In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by Christopher Carr and D. Troy Case, pp. 575–623. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Chapman, Jefferson, and Keel, Bennie C. 1979 Candy Creek-Connestee Components in Eatem Tennessee and Western North Carolina and their Relationship with Adena-Hopewell. In Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Conference, edited by David S. Brose and N'omi B. Greber, pp. 157–161. Kent State University Press, Ohio.Google Scholar
Clay, R. Berle 1987 Circles and Ovals: Two Types of Adena Space. Southeastern Archaeology 6:46–56.Google Scholar
Clay, R. Berle 1998 The Essential Features of Adena Ritual and Their Implications. Southeastern Archaeology 17:1–21.Google Scholar
Clay, R. Berle 2002 Deconstructing the Woodland Sequence from the Heartland: A Review of Recent Research Directions in the Upper Ohio Valley. In The Woodland Southeast, edited by David G. Anderson and Robert C. Mainfort. Jr., pp. 162–184. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Clay, R. Berle 2005 Adena: Rest in Peace? In Woodland Period Systematics in the Middle Ohio Valley, edited by Darlene Applegate and Robert C. Mainfort. Jr., pp. 94–110. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Cobb, Charles R. 2005 Archaeology and the “Savage Slot”: Displacement and Emplacement in the Premodern World. American Anthropologist 107:563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBoer, Warren R. 1997 Ceremonial Centres from the Cayapas (Esmeraldas, Ecuador) to Chillicothe (Ohio, USA). Cambridge Archaeological Journal 7:225–253.Google Scholar
Eastman, Jane M. 1994 North Carolina Radiocarbon Dates. Southern Indian Studies 43:1–83.Google Scholar
Greber, N’omi B. 2006 Enclosures and Communities in Ohio Hopewell: An Essay. In Recreating Hopewell, edited by Douglas C. Charles and Jane E. Buikstra, pp. 74–105. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Greenman, Emerson F. 1938 Hopewellian Traits in Florida. American Antiquity 3:327–332.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B. 1967 Eastern North American Archaeology: A Summary. Science 156:175–191.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert L. 1997 An Archaeology of the Soul: North American Indian Belief and Ritual. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Helms, Mary W. 1988 Ulysses’ Sail: An Ethnographic Odyssey of Power, Knowledge, and Geographical Distance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Holmes, William H. 1919 Handbook of Aboriginal American Antiquities Part I: Introductory, The Lithic Industries. Smithsonian Institution Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Horsley, Timothy J., Wright, Alice P., and Barrier, Casey R. 2014 Prospecting for New Questions: Integrating Geophysics to Define Anthropological Research Objectives and Inform Excavation Strategies at Monumental Sites. Archaeological Prospection 21:75–86.Google Scholar
Jefferies, Richard W. 1994 The Swift Creek Site and Woodland Platform Mounds in the Southeastern United States. In Ocmulgee Archaeology, 1936–1986, edited by David Hally, pp. 71–83. University of Georgia Press, Athens.Google Scholar
Jefferies, Richard W., Milner, George R., and Henry, Edward R. 2013 Winchester Farm: A Small Adena Enclosure in Central Kentucky. In Early and Middle Woodland Landscapes of the Southeast, edited by Alice P. Wright and Edward R. Henry, pp. 91–107. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Keel, Bennie C. 1976 Cherokee Archaeology: A Study of the Appalachian Summit. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Keith, Scot 2013 The Woodland Period Cultural Landscape of the Leake Site Complex. In Early and Middle Woodland Landscapes of the Southeast, edited by Alice P. Wright and Edward R. Henry, pp. 138–152. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Kimball, Larry R., Whyte, Thomas R., and Crites, Gary D. 2010 The Biltmore Mound and Hopewellian Mound Use in the Southern Appalachians. Southeastern Archaeology 29: 44–58.Google Scholar
Knight, Vernon James Jr. 1990 Excavation of the Truncated Mound at the Walling Stie: Middle Woodland Culture and Copena in the Tennessee Valley. Office of Archaeological Research, Alabama State Museum of Natural History, Huntsville.Google Scholar
Knight, Vernon James Jr. 2001 Feasting and the Emergence of Platform Mound Ceremonialism in Eastern North America. In Feasts: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics, and Power, edited by Michael Dietler and Brian Hayden, pp. 239–254. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Lindauer, Owen, and Blitz, John H. 1997 Higher Ground: The Archaeology of North American Platform Mounds. Journal of Archaeological Research 5:169–207.Google Scholar
Lynott, Mark J. 2004 Earthwork Construction and the Organization of Hopewell Society. Hopewell Archaeology: The Newsletter of Hopewell Archaeology in the Ohio River Valley 6, No. 1. http://www.nos.gov/history/mwac/hopewell/v6nl/sixJitm, accessed February 1,2013.Google Scholar
Pacheco, Paul J. 1996 Introduction. In A View from the Core: A Synthesis of Ohio Hopewell Archaeology, edited by Paul J. Pacheco, pp.vi–vii. Ohio Archaeological Council, Columbus.Google Scholar
Pauketat, Timothy R. 2001 Practice and History in Archaeology: An Emerging Paradigm. Anthropological Theory 1:73–98.Google Scholar
Reimer, P.J., Baillie, M.G.L., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Blackwell, P.G., and Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009 IntCal09 and Marine09 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves, 0-50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51:1111–1150.Google Scholar
Ruby, Bret J., and Shriner, Christine M. 2005 Ceramic Vessel Compositions and Styles as Evidence of the Local and Nonlocal Social Affiliations of Ritual Participants at the Mann Site, Indiana. In Gathering Hopewell: Society, Ritual, and Ritual Interaction, edited by Christopher Carr and D. Troy Case, pp. 553–572. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Sassaman, Kenneth E. 2010 The Eastern Archaic, Historiciied. AltaMira, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Sears, William H. 1962 The Hopewellian Affiliations of Certain Sites on the Gulf Coast of Florida. American Antiquity 28:5–18.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F. 1979 The Hopewell Interaction Sphere: The Evidence for Interregional Trade and Structural Complexity. Indiana Historical Society, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F. 1995 When Words are Not Enough: Hopewell Interre-gionalism and the Use of Material Symbols at the GE Mound. In Native American Interactions: Multiscalar Analyses and Interpretations in the Eastern Woodlands, edited by Michael S. Nassaney and Kenneth E. Sassaman, pp. 122–143. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Seeman, Mark F. 2004 Hopewell Art in Hopewell Places. In The Hero, Hawk, and the Open Hand: American Indian Art of the Ancient Midwest and South, edited by Richard Townsend, pp. 57–72. Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sherwood, Sarah C, and Kidder, Tristram R. 2011 The DaVincis of Dirt: Geoarchaeological Perspectives on Native American Mound Building in the Mississippi River Basin. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 30:69–87.Google Scholar
Shetrone, Henry C. 2004 [1930] The Moundbuilders. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Spielmann, Katherine A. 2009 Ohio Hopewell Ritual Craft Production. In Footprints: In the Footprints of Squier and Davis, edited by Mark J. Lynott, pp. 179–188. Midwest Archaeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska.Google Scholar
Spivey, S. Margaret, Kidder, Tristram R., Ortmann, Anthony A., and Arco, Lee 2014 Pilgrimage to Poverty Point? In The Enigma of the Event: Moments of Consequence in the Ancient Southeast, edited by Zackary Gilmore and Jason O’Donoughue. University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, in press.Google Scholar
Squier, Ephraim G., and Davis, Edwin H. 1988 [1848] Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley, Comprising the Results of Extensive Original Surveys and Explorations. Contributions to Knowledge. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Stoltman, James B. 1999 Icehouse Bottom and the Hopewell Connection. Research Notes, Frank H. McClung Museum 17.Google Scholar
Streuver, Stuart, and Houart, Gail L. 1972 An Analysis of the Hopewell Interaction Sphere. In Social Exchange and Interaction, edited by Edwin N. Wilmsen, pp. 47–79. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Walthall, John A. 1985 Early Hopewellian Ceremonial Encampments in the South Applachian Highlands. In Structure and Process in Southeastern Archaeology, edited by Roy S. Dickens and H. Trawick Ward, pp. 243–262. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Ward, H. Trawick, and Stephen Davis, R. P. Jr. 1999 Time Before History: The Archaeology of North Carolina. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Webb, William S., and Snow, Charles E. 1945 The Adena People. Reports in Anthropology and Archaeology 6. University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
Wright, Alice P. 2013 Under the Mound: The Early Life History of the Creek Mound No. 2 Site. In Social Landscapes of the Early and Middle Woodland Southeast, edited by Alice P Wright and Edward R Henry, pp. 108–121. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Wright, Alice P. 2013 Monumental Memes: The Architectural Grammar of Early-Middle Woodland Enclosures in the Southeast. Manuscript on file, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Wright, Alice P., and Loveland, Erika 2013 Ritualized Craft Production at a Hopewell Periphery: New Evidence from the Appalachian Summit. Manuscript on file, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar