Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:48:19.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gold Ornaments of Chavín Style from Chongoyape, Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

S. K. Lothrop
S. K. Lothrop*
Affiliation:
Peabody Museum Cambridge, Mass.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Chavín de Huántar is a small village located in the Department of Ancash in the high mountains of central Peru. Near the modern town is a vast, partly subterranean temple, dating from prehistoric times, within and near which have been found numerous stone carvings of distinctive styles. The name Chavín has thus been applied to a very ancient culture which apparently once dominated the northern interior of Peru and, in places, emerged in the coastal valleys.

The existence, if not the status, of Chavín culture was brought to the attention of the outside world many years ago by Antonio Raimondi, whose name clings to the celebrated stone carvings seen in Fig. 27, b. Charles Wiener has left a description of the great temple at Chavín and the huge dagger-like stone carving that was its chief idol. Plans and photographs have been recently published by Cornelius Roosevelt. In 1919, Dr. Julio C.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , January 1941 , pp. 250 - 262
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Antze, Gustav 1930. “Metallarbeiten aus dem nördlichen Peru.” Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Volkerkunde in Hamburg. Vol. 15.Google Scholar
Baessler, A. 1906. Altperuanische Metallgeräte. Berlin.Google Scholar
Institute of Andean Research 1936–1937. Report. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1925. The Uhle pottery collections from Moche. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 21, No. 5.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1930a. Archaeological Explorations in Peru. Part II. The Northern Coast. Field Museum of Natural History, Anthropology, Memoirs, Vol. 2, No. 2.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1930b. “Cultural Relations between North and South America.” XXIII International Congress of Americanists. New York.Google Scholar
Lothrop, S. K. 1936. Zacualpa. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication 472. Washington.Google Scholar
Lothrop, S. K. 1938. “Gold and Silver from Southern Peru and Bolivia.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. Vol. 67. London.Google Scholar
Means, P. A. 1931. Ancient Civilizations of the Andes. New York: London.Google Scholar
Means, P. A. 1934a. “Des Commentaires sur l'Architecture Ancienne de la Côte Péruvienne.” Société des Américanistes de Belgique. Bulletin 14.Google Scholar
Means, P. A. 1934b. “New Light on Early America.” The New York Times Magazine. May 20.Google Scholar
Polo, J. T. 1899. “La Piedra de Chavin.” Boletín de la Sociedad Geográfica de Lima. Ano IV, Tomo IX, Trimestre II.Google Scholar
Raimondi, Antonio 1874. El Peru. Lima.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Cornelius 1935. “Ancient Civilization of the Santa Valley and Chavin.” Geographical Review. Vol. 25. New York.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Max 1929. Kunst und Kultur von Peru. Berlin.Google Scholar
Tello, J. C. 1923. “Wira Kocha.” Inca. Tomo I. Lima.Google Scholar
Tello, J. C. 1929. Antiquo Peru, Primera Épocha. Lima.Google Scholar
Tello, J. C. 1937. “Los Trabajos Arqueolôgicos en el Departmento de Lambayeque.” Letter to El Comercio. Jan. 22. Lima.Google Scholar
Weiner, Charles 1880. Pérou et Bolivie. Paris.Google Scholar
Yakovleff, Eugenio 1931. “El Vencejo (Cypselus) en el Arte Decorativo de Nasca.” Wira Kocha. Tomo 1, No. 1. Lima.Google Scholar