Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-14T00:39:04.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further Comments on Emery and Edwards’ “Archaeological Potential of the Atlantic Shelf”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ripley P. Bullen*
Affiliation:
Florida State Museum, Gainesville, Florida

Abstract

Salwen (1967) in commenting on Emery and Edwards’ stimulating article supplied several important data for northeastern United States. The author, who has for a long time been in agreement with Emery and Edwards’ general conclusions, offers additional supportive data from both coasts of Florida.

Type
Facts and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, Steve and MacMahan, Jeannie 1967 The Zabski Site, Merritt Island, Florida. Florida Anthropologist, Vol. 20, Nos. 3–4, pp. 13345. Tallahassee.Google Scholar
Bullen, Adelaide K. and Bullen, Ripley P. 1950 The Johns Island Site, Hernando County, Florida. American Antiquity, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 2345. Menasha.Google Scholar
Bullen, Ripley P., Bullen, Adelaide K., and Clausen, Carl J. 1968 The Cato Site near Sebastian Inlet, Florida. MS, accepted for publication, Florida Anthropologist. Tallahassee.Google Scholar
Emery, K. O. and Edwards, R. L. 1966 Archaeological Potential of the Atlantic Continental Shelf. American Antiquity, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 7337. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Salwen, Bert 1967 A Comment on Emery and Edwards' “Archaeological Potential of the Atlantic Continental Shelf.” American Antiquity, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 5467. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar