Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:09:09.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethnomineralogy of Ticul, Yucatan Potters: Etics and Emics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Dean E. Arnold
Dean E. Arnold*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The emic cultural categories of pottery materials used by the community of potters in Ticul, Yucatan, were compared to the etic mineralogical analysis of these materials. The study reveals that there is a definite relationship between the cognitive ethnomineralogical system used by the community of potters in Ticul and the verbal, non-verbal, and material aspects of the process of selecting and using raw materials for making pottery. This relationship indicates that the Ticul potter has a sophisticated understanding of his raw materials and suggests several implications for archaeology: (1) the cultural patterns which are manifested in the artifacts may be cognitive; (2) since potters’ discriminations are manifested in the physical world, it should be possible to reconstruct ancient emic categories from physical contrasts in the artifacts without the use of ethnographic analogy; (3) the definition of temper as nonplastics may eliminate important cultural information from archaeological consideration; and (4) the community of potters is the unit of population which uses a particular ethnomineralogical system and would be expected to produce a paste and slip combination which is relatively uniform. All of these data indicate that many of the notions of cognitive anthropology can be successfully applied to archaeological considerations.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , January 1971 , pp. 20 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, Dean E. 1967 Sak lu’um in Maya culture: and its possible relation to Maya Blue. University of Illinois, Department of Anthropology, Research Reports, No. 2.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1962 Archaeology as anthropology. American Antiquity 28:217–225.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1965 Archaeological systematics and the study of culture process. American Antiquity 31:203–210.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1967 Comment on K. C. Chang’s “Major aspects of the interrelationship of archaeology and ethnology.” Current Anthropology 8:234–235.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R., and Binford, Sally R. (editors) 1968 New perspectives in archeology. Aldine.Google Scholar
Black, Mary 1963 On formal ethnographic procedures. American Anthropologist 65:1347–1351.Google Scholar
Black, Mary, and Metzger, Duane 1965 Ethnographic description and the study of law. American Anthropologist 67(6, Pt.2):141–165.Google Scholar
Chang, K.C. 1967 Major aspects of the interrelationship of archaeology and ethnology. Current Anthropology 8:227–243.Google Scholar
Conklin, H.C. 1962 Lexigraphical treatment of folk taxonomies. International Journal of American Linguistics 28:119–141.Google Scholar
Deetz, James 1965 The dynamics of stylistic change in Arikara ceramics. Illinois Studies in Anthropology, No. 4. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Frake, Charles 1962 The ethnographic study of cognitive systems. In Anthropology and human behavior, edited by Thomas Gladwin and W. C. Sturtevant, pp. 72–85. Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar
Frake, Charles 1964 Notes on queries in ethnography. American Anthropologist 66(3, Pt.2):132–145.Google Scholar
Gardin, J. C. 1965 On a possible interpretation of componential analysis in archeology. American Anthropologist 67(5, Pt.2):9–22.Google Scholar
Goodenough, Ward 1956 Componential analysis and the study of meaning, Language 32:195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, Ward 1957 Cultural anthropology and linguistics. In “Report of the seventh annual round table meeting on linguistics and language study,” edited by Paul Garvin, pp. 167–173. Georgetown University Press. Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics, No. 9.Google Scholar
Grim, R. E. 1962 Applied clay mineralogy. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Harris, Marvin 1968 The rise of anthropological theory. Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Longacre, William 1964 Sociological implications of the ceramic analysis. In P. S. Martin et al., “Chapters in the prehistory of eastern Arizona II,” Fieldiana: Anthropology 55:155–170.Google Scholar
Longacre, William 1968 Some aspects of prehistoric society in east central Arizona. In New perspectives in archeology, edited by Lewis R. Binford and Sally R. Binford, pp. 89–102. Aldine Google Scholar
Metzger, Duane, and Williams, Gerald E. 1963a Tenejapa medicine 1: the curer. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 19:216–236.Google Scholar
Metzger, Duane, and Williams, Gerald E. 1963b A formal ethnographic analysis of Tenejapa Ladino weddings. American Anthropologist 65:1076–1101.Google Scholar
Metzger, Duane, and Williams, Gerald E. 1966 Some procedures and results in the studies of native categories. American Anthropologist 68:389–407.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. 1966 Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Moulton.Google Scholar
Schultz, L. G., Shepard, A. O., Blackman, P. D., and Starkey, H. C. 1969 Mixed-layer kaolinite-montmorillonitc from the Yucatan Penninsula. Abstracts of 18th Clay Conference, p. 33.Google Scholar
Shepard, Anna O. 1956 Ceramics for the archaeologist. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 609.Google Scholar
Thompson, Edward H. 1895 The chultunes of Labna, Yucatan. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 1, No. 3.Google Scholar
Thompson, Raymond H. 1958 Modern Yucatecan Maya pottery making. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 15.Google Scholar
Tyler, Steven A. 1969 Cognitive anthropology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Van Olphen, H. 1963 An introduction to clay colloid chemistry. Interscience.Google Scholar
West, Robert C. 1964 Surface configuration and associated geology of Middle America. Handbook of Middle A merican Indians, Vol. 1:33–83. University of Texas Press.Google Scholar