Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:50:10.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Curatorial Considerations for Systematic Research Collections: AMS Dating a Curated Ceramic Assemblage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William A. Lovis
William A. Lovis*
Affiliation:
University Museum and Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1045
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The needs of new analytic techniques that may be depleting or destructive, or which have requirements that may be at odds with other approaches, place new and different demands on curated archaeological research collections. Curatorial approaches and attitudes need to accomodate such changes in research environment and be aware of both the potentials of curated collections as well possible conflicts. A pilot study employing AMS dating of adhering residues on a curated ceramic collection is used to illustrate curatorial concerns and decisions associated with the use of modern techniques. It is argued that continued use of such collections is important, and that management decisions must keep pace with technological innovations.

Résumé

Résumé

Los requisitos necesarios para ejecutar los métodos nuevos de tecnología analítica, los cuales destruyen y diminuyen colecciones arqeológicas que han sido tratadas para conservación, ya a veces tienen requisitos propios que quizá no acorden con otros procedimentos, presentan nuevas y differentes exigencias sobre las colecciones ya mencionadas. Los métodos de tratamiento de dichas colecciones y las actitudes y posiciones sobre los mismos necesitan ser adaptados a cambios en las condiciones de investigatión, y los investigadores deben ser conscientes de el potencial que poseen estas colecciones asi como de la possible existencia de conflictos y desacuerdos con otros métodos. Se condujo un estudio piloto en el cual se utilizó el método de espectografia de masa acelerada para datar los residuos adheridos a la superficie de objetos de una colección de objetos cerámicos que habían sido previamente tratados para conservación. El objectivo de este estudio fue el de ilustrar ciertos puntos de importancia y decisiones que se deben de considerar cuando se utilizan métodos de análisis modernos. Se sostiene que es importante sequir sometiendo estas colecciones a los métodos de análisis modernos, y que las decisiones de manejo y administration de tales colecciones deben de mantenerse al tanto de los avances e inovaciones de la tecnologia analítica moderna.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 382 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bill, J., Keller, W., Erne, R., Bonani, G., and Wolfli, W. 1984 14C Dating of Small Archaeological Samples : Neolithic to Iron Age in the Central Alpine Region. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research 233 : 317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonani, G., Balzer, R., Hofmann, H., Morenzoni, E., Nessi, M., Suter, M., and Wolfli, W. 1984 Properties of Milligram Size Samples Prepared for AMS C-14 Dating at ETH. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research 233 : 284–288.Google Scholar
Brashler, J. G. 1973 A Formal Analysis of Ceramics from the Fletcher site. Master's thesis, Michigan State University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Brashler, J. G. 1981 Early Late Woodland Boundaries and Interaction : Indian Ceramics of Southern Lower Michigan. Anthropological Series 3(3). The Museum, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
Bruier, F. L. 1976 New Clues to Stone Tool Function : Plant and Animal Residues. American Antiquity 41 : 478–484.Google Scholar
Carstens, K. C. 1972 Tobico (20BY32), a Late Woodland Site in Bay County, Michigan. The Michigan Archaeologist 18 : 113–168.Google Scholar
Clark, C. P. 1986 The Prehistory of the Birch Run Road Site, Saginaw County, Michigan. The Michigan Archaeologist 32 : 1–92.Google Scholar
Crane, H., and Griffin, J. B. 1968 University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates XII. Radiocarbon 10 : 61–114.Google Scholar
Crane, H., and Griffin, J. B. 1972 University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates XV. Radiocarbon 14 : 195–222.Google Scholar
DeNiro, M. J. 1987 Stable Isotopy and Archaeology. American Scientist 75 : 182–191.Google Scholar
Hastorf, C, and DeNiro, M. 1985 Reconstruction of Prehistoric Plant Production and Cooking Practices by a New Isotopic Method. Atawre 315 : 489-491.Google Scholar
Johnson, R., Stipp, J., Tamers, M., Bonani, G., Suter, M., and Wolfli., W. 1986 Archaeological Sherd Dating : Comparison of Thermoluminescence Dates by Beta Counting and Accelerator Techniques. Radiocarbon 28 : 719–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. E., Klippel, W. E., and Duffield, R. 1975 Pollen Preservation and Archaeology in Eastern North America. American Antiquity 40 : 180–190.Google Scholar
Kinietz, W. V. 1940 The Indians of the Western Great Lakes, 1615-1760. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovis, W. A. 1986 Seasonal Settlement Dynamics and the Role of the Fletcher Site in the Woodland Adaptations of the Saginaw Drainage Basin. Arctic Anthropology 22 : 153–170.Google Scholar
Lovis, W. A. 1987 Refining Regional Woodland Ceramic Chronology by Use of AMS C-14 and Carbonized Food Residues. Paper presented at the 1987 Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Chicago. Ms. on file, The Museum, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
Loy, T. H. 1983 Prehistoric Blood Residues : Detection on Tool Surfaces and Identification of Species of Origin. Science 220 : 1269–1271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, D. E., Loy, T. H., Vogel, J. S., and Southon, J. R. 1986 Radiocarbon Dating Blood Residues on Prehistoric Stone Tools. Radiocarbon 28 : 170–174.Google Scholar
Schafer, H. J., and Halloway, R. G. 1979 Organic Residue Analysis in Determining Stone Tool Function. In Lithic Use-Wear Analysis, edited by Hayden, B., pp. 385–399. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. B. 1982 Hohokam Chronology : An Essay on History and Method. In Hohokam and Patayan : Prehistory of Southwestern Arizona, edited by McGuire, R. H. and Schiffer, M. B., pp. 521–528. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., and Becker, B. 1986 High Precision Decadal Calibration of the Radiocarbon Time Scale, A. D. 1950-2500 B. C. Radiocarbon 28 : 863–910. Oeschger Google Scholar
Suter, M., Balzer, R., Bonani, G., Hofman, H., Morenzoni, E., Nessi, M., Wolfli, W., Andree, M., Beer, J., 1984 Precision Measurements of C-14 in AMS— Some Results and Prospects. Nuclear Instruments and • Methods 233 : 117–122.Google Scholar
Vogel, J. D., and Merwe, N. J. van der 1977 Isotopic Evidence for Early Maize Cultivation in New York State. American Antiquity 42 : 238–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Merwe, N. J., 1982 Carbon Isotopes, Photosynthesis, and Archaeology. American Scientist 70 : 596–606.Google Scholar