Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:59:31.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coring Archaeological Sites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Julie K. Stein
Julie K. Stein*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, DH-05, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The history of coring and augering at archaeological sites is traced to two periods in the twentieth century. In the first period, Period I (1935-1955), the technique was used primarily to correlate archaeological deposits with river sediments for dating purposes. Rarely were the deposits containing artifacts cored or augered; rather the stratigraphic relationship of cultural to non-cultural deposits was sought. Most of this work was done in the Lower Mississippi River Delta where geologists had calculated absolute dates for river deposits. This period seems to have ended with the availability of radiometric dating and was followed by Period II (1964-present). After 1964 there is a renewed interest in coring and augering, mostly following a shift in archaeological research interests from culture history toward ecological questions. This shift coincides with the availability of a new device: a mechanical corer. During Period II, coring is utilized in many different projects, including reconstructing the environment surrounding sites, collection of samples from subsurface deposits, and locating buried archaeological sites. Following the discussion of the history of coring and augering, a description of equipment, techniques, and data potential is presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , July 1986 , pp. 505 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Baden, W. W. 1983 Tomotley: An Eighteenth Century Cherokee Village. Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Report of Investigations No. 36 and Tennessee Valley Authority, Publication in Anthropology No. 35.Google Scholar
Black, G. A. 1967 Angel Site: An Archaeological, Historical, and Ethnological Study. Indiana Historical Society, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Blake, G. R. 1965 Bulk Density. In Methods of Soil Analysis, edited by Black, C. A., pp. 374–390. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Brannon, H. R. Jr., Daughtry, A. C., Perry, D., Simons, L. H., Whitaker, W. W., and Williams, M. 1957a Humble Oil Company Radiocarbon Dates I. Science 125: 147–150.Google Scholar
Brannon, H. R. Jr., Daughtry, A. C., Perry, D., Simons, L. H., Whitaker, W. W., and Williams, M. 1957b Humble Oil Company Radiocarbon Dates II. Science 125: 919–923.Google Scholar
Brinker, R. 1982 Test Excavations at Crib Mound Site (12 Sp 1, 12 Sp 2), Spencer County, Indiana. Prepared for Energy Supply, Inc. Indiana Historical Society and Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Byers, D. 1967 Prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley, vol. 1. University of Austin Press, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Campbell, S. K. 1981 The Duwamish No. 1 Site, A Lower Puget Sound Shell Midden. University of Washington Institute for Environmental Studies, Office of Public Archaeology, Report 1, Seattle, Washington.Google Scholar
Casteel, R. W. 1970 Core and Column Sampling. American Antiquity 35: 465–467.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. 1980 Wear Bend Site (40LD107). In The 1979 Archaeological and Geological Investigations in the Tellico Reservoir, edited by Chapman, J., pp. 32–42. Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Report of Investigations No. 29 and Tennessee Valley Authority, Publications in Anthropology No. 24. Google Scholar
Cole, Fay-Cooper 1937 Rediscovering Illinois, Archaeological Exploration in and around Fulton County. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F., and Treganza, A. E. 1950 Quantitative Investigation of Indian Mounds. University of California, Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 40: 223–261.Google Scholar
Crook, A. R. 1922 The Origin of the Cahokia Mounds. Bulletin of the Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Dorwin, J. T. 1978 Archaeological Borings at Grandview and Corps of Engineers Properties, Spencer County, Indiana. Prepared for Indiana and Michigan Electric Company, Rockport Generating Station. Soil Systems, Inc., Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
Dorwin, J. T., and Kellar, J. H. 1968 The 1967 Excavation at the Yankeetown Site. Prepared for the National Park Service. Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Dunnell, R. C, and Campbell, S. K. 1977 History of Aboriginal Occupation of Hamilton Island, Washington. University of Washington, Department of Anthropology, Reports in Archaeology, No. 4.Google Scholar
Fisk, H. N. 1940 Geology of Avoyelles and Rapides Parishes. Geological Bulletin, Department of Conservation, Louisiana Geological Survey, No. 18. Google Scholar
Fisk, H. N. 1944 Geological Investigations of the Alluvial Valley of the Lower Mississippi River. Vicksburg, Mississippi, War Department, Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army.Google Scholar
Ford, J. A. 1935 Ceramic Decoration Sequence at an Old Indian Village Site near Sicily Island, Louisiana. Anthropology Study, Department of Conservation, Louisiana Geological Survey, No. 1, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Ford, J. A. 1951 Greenhouse: A Troyville-Coles Creek Period Site in Avoyelles Parish, Louisiana. American Museum of Natural History Anthropological Papers, vol. 44(1).Google Scholar
Ford, J. A., Phillips, P., and Haag, W. G. 1955 The Jaketown Site in West-Central Mississippi. American Museum of Natural History Anthropological Papers, vol. 45(1).Google Scholar
Ford, J. A., and Quimby, G. I. Jr., 1945 The Tchefuncte Culture, an Early Occupation of the Lower Mississippi Valley. Memoirs of the Society of American Archaeology 10(3) part 2.Google Scholar
Ford, J. A., and Webb, C. H. 1956 Poverty Point, a Late Archaic Site in Louisiana. American Museum of Natural History Anthropological Papers, vol. 46(1).Google Scholar
Fry, R. E. 1972 Manually Operated Post-Hole Diggers as Sampling Instruments. American Antiquity 37: 259–261.Google Scholar
Gagliano, S. M. 1967 Occupation Sequence at Avery Island. Louisiana State University Studies, Coastal Studies Series No. 22.Google Scholar
Gardner, G. D., and Donahue, J. 1985 The Little Platte Drainage, Missouri: A Model for Locating Temporal Surfaces in a Fluvial Environ ment. In Archaeological Sediments in Context, edited by Stein, J. K. and Farrand, W. R., pp. 69–89. Center for the Study of Early Man, Institute for Quaternary Studies, University of Maine at Orono.Google Scholar
Gilford, E. N. 1916 Composition of California Shellmounds. University of California, Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 12: 1–29.Google Scholar
Gladfelter, B. G. 1980 Investigations at the Labras Lake Site: Geomorphology, vol. 2. Department of Geography, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Gladfelter, B. G. 1981 Investigations at the Labras Lake Site: Geomorphological Observations in the Vicinity of the Site, vol. 3. Department of Geography, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Gordon, B. C. 1978 Chemical and Pedological Delimiting of Deeply Stratified Archaeological Sites in Frozen Ground. Journal of Field Archaeology 5: 331–338.Google Scholar
Hemmings, E. T. 1977 The Core Drilling Project at Grave Creek Mound: Preliminary Results and Radiocarbon Date. West Virginia Archaeologist 26: 59–68.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. L., and Alexander, C. S. 1975 A Portable Coring Device for Rapid Site-Sampling. Plains Anthropologist 20: 135–137.Google Scholar
Kniffen, F. B. 1936 A Preliminary Report on the Mounds and Middens of Plaquemines and St. Bernard Parishes, Lower Mississippi River Delta. Department of Conservation, Louisiana Geological Survey, Bulletin 8: 407–422.Google Scholar
Kniffen, F. B. 1938 The Indian Mounds of Iberville Parish. Department of Conservation, Louisiana Geological Survey, Bulletin 13: 189–207.Google Scholar
Leach, E. K. 1980 Geomorphology and Archaeology of the Lower Tennessee River Valley. Paper presented at the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Leach, E. K. 1981 The Archeological Geology of the Archaic Morrisroe Site, Tennessee River, Western Kentucky. Unpublished master's thesis, Department of Geology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Leighton, M. M. 1923 The Geological Aspects of Some of the Cahokia (Illinois) Mounds. In The Cahokia Mounds, A Report of Progress, by Moorehead, W. K.. University of Illinois Bulletin, vol. 21, Pt. 2, No. 6, Urbana.Google Scholar
Lewarch, D. E., and Reynolds, K. J. 1975 Report of Archaeological Investigations on Hamilton Island, Skamania, Washington. University of Washington, Office of Public Archaeology, Institute for Environmental Studies, Reconnaissance Report No. 5, Seattle.Google Scholar
Marquardt, W. H., and Watson, P. J. 1983 The Shell Mound Archaic of Western Kentucky. In Archaic Hunters and Gatherers in the American Midwest, edited by Phillips, J. L. and Brown, J. A., pp. 323–339. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Mclntire, W. G. 1958 Prehistoric Indian Settlements of the Changing Mississippi Delta. Louisiana State University Studies, Coastal Studies Series No. 1.Google Scholar
Morse, D. F. 1975 Reply to Schiffer. In The Cache River Archeological Project: An Experiment in Contract Archeology, edited by Schiffer, M. B. and House, J. H., pp. 113–119. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Publication in Archeology, Research Series No. 8.Google Scholar
Munson, C. A. 1977 Buried Sites and Hidden Data: Deep Testing of Archaeological Sites in the Ohio Valley. Paper presented at Midwest Archaeological Conference, Beloit College, Beloit, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Munson, C. A. 1980 Archaeological Salvage Excavations at Patoka Lake, Indiana: Prehistoric Occupations of the Upper Patoka River Valley. Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, Indiana University, Research Reports, No. 6.Google Scholar
Munson, C. A. 1982 The Southwind Site Project: Archaeological Data Recovery at a Mississippian Village, Posey County, Indiana. Paper presented at Southeastern Archaeological Conference, 39th Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
Myers, J. A. (editor) 1981 Archaeological Data Recovery at the Mary Ann Cole Site (12 Cr 1), Crawford County, Indiana; a Prehistoric Lithic Workshop at the Confluence of the Blue and Ohio Rivers. Prepared for the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. Resource Analysts Inc., Bloomington, Indiana.Google Scholar
Parmalee, P. W., and Klippel, W. E. 1974 Freshwater Mussels as a Prehistoric Food Resource. American Antiquity 3: 421–434.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. L., and Gladfelter, B. G. 1983 The Labras Lake Site and the Paleogeographic Setting of the Late Archaic in the American Bottom. In Archaic Hunters and Gatherers in the American Midwest, edited by Phillips, J. L. and Brown, J. A., pp. 197–218. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Phillips, P., Ford, J. A., and Griffin, J. B. 1951 Archaeological Survey in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley 1940-1947. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, 25.Google Scholar
Polhemus, R. R. 1982 Small Diameter Cores: A Versatile Investigative Technique for the Field Archaeologist. Paper presented at the Conference on Historic Site Archaeology, Asheville, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Polhemus, R. R. 1984 The Toqua Site (40MR6): A Late Mississippian Dallas Phase Town. Report submitted to National Park Service and Tennessee Valley Authority. To be published as Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Report of Investigations No. 41.Google Scholar
Price, J. C, Hunter, R. G., and McMichael, E. V. 1964 Core Drilling in an Archaeological Site. American Antiquity 30: 219–222.Google Scholar
Reed, N. A., Bennett, J. W., and Porter, J. W. 1968 Solid Core Drilling of Monk's Mound: Technique and Findings. American Antiquity 33: 137–148.Google Scholar
Reidhead, V. A., and Limp, W. F. 1974 The Haag Site (12 D 19): A Preliminary Report. Indiana Archaeological Bulletin 1: 4–19. Indiana Historical Society, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Russ, K. C, and Chapman, J. 1983 Archaeological Investigations at the 18th Century Overhill Cherokee Town of Mialoquo. Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Report of Investigations No. 37 and Tennessee Valley Authority, Publications in Anthropology No. 36.Google Scholar
Russell, R. J. 1936 Physiography of Lower Mississippi River Delta. Department of Conservation, Louisiana Geological Survey, Bulletin 8: 3–199.Google Scholar
Saucier, R. 1974 Quaternary Geology of the Lower Mississippi Valley. Arkansas Archaeological Survey, Research Series 6.Google Scholar
Scarborough, V. L. 1983 A Preclassic Maya Water System. American Antiquity 48: 720–744.Google Scholar
Schroedl, G. F. (editor) 1982 Overhill Cherokee Archaeology at Chota-Tanasee. Report submitted to National Park Service and Tennessee Valley Authority. To be published as Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Report of Investigation No. 38.Google Scholar
Sorant, P. and Shenkel, J. R. 1984 The Calculation of Volumes of Middens, Mounds, and Strata Having Irregular Shapes. American Antiquity 49: 599–603.Google Scholar
Stein, J. K. 1978 Augering Archaeological Sites. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Newsletter 20: 11–18.Google Scholar
Stein, J. K. 1980 Geoarchaeology of the Green River Shell Mound, Kentucky. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Minnesota, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Stein, J. K. 1982 Geological Analysis of the Green River Shell Middens. Southeastern Archaeology 1: 22–39.Google Scholar
Stein, J. K. 1983 Earthworm Activity: A Source of Potential Disturbance of Archaeological Sediments. American Antiquity 48: 277–289.Google Scholar
Stein, J. K. 1985 Interpreting Sediments in Cultural Settings. In Archaeological Sediments in Context, edited by Stein, J. K. and Farrand, W. R., pp. 5–19. Center for the Study of Early Man, Institute for Quaternary Studies, University of Maine at Orono.Google Scholar
Stein, J. K., Carstens, K. C., and Wesler, K. W. 1983 Geoarchaeology and Historical Archaeology: An Example from Fort Jefferson, Kentucky. Southeastern Archaeology 2: 132–144.Google Scholar
Stein, J. K., and Rapp, G. Jr., 1978 Archaeological Sediments. In Nichoria I: Site, Environs, Techniques, edited by Rapp, G. Jr, and Aschenbrenner., S. E. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Stein, J. K., Watson, P. J., and White, W. B. 1981 Geoarchaeology of the Flint Mammoth Cave System and the Green River, Western Kentucky. Geological Society of America Field Trip Guidebook, vol. 3, pp. 507–542. American Geological Institute, Falls Church, Virginia.Google Scholar
Struever, S., , Watson, P. J., and White, W. B. 1968 Flotation Techniques for the Recovery of Small-scale Archaeological Remains. American Antiquity 33: 353–362.Google Scholar
Styles, B. W., Ahler, S. R., and Fowler, M. L. 1983 Modoc Rock Shelter Revisited. In Archaic Hunters and Gatherers in the American Midwest, edited by Phillips, J. L. and Brown, J. A., pp. 261–297. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Vickery, K. D. 1970 Excavation of the Yankeetown Site, 1968 Season. Prepared for the National Park Service. Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Watson, P. J., LeBlanc, S. A., and Redmond, C. L. 1984 Archaeological Explanation: The Scientific Method in Archeology. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Webb, W. S. 1946 Indian Knoll. University of Kentucky Reports in Anthropology and Archaeology 4(1): 111–556.Google Scholar
Webb, W. S. 1950 The Carlson Annis Mound. University of Kentucky Reports in Anthropology and Archaeology 7: 355–402.Google Scholar
Wetzel, R. G. 1975 Limnology. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Wiant, M. D., Hajic, E. R., and Styles, T. R. 1983 Napoleon Hollow and Koster Site Stratigraphy: Implications for Holocene Landscape Evolution and Studies of Archaic Period Settlement Patterns in the Lower Illinois River Valley. In Archaic Hunters and Gatherers in the American Midwest, edited by Phillips, J. L. and Brown, J. A., pp. 147–164. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar