Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:06:42.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Concerning Girard's Reply to de Borhegyi's Review of Los Mayas Eternos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Stephan F. de Borhegyi
Stephan F. de Borhegyi*
Affiliation:
Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his reply to de Borhegyi's review of his book Los Mayas Eternos, Girard succeeds in bringing greater confusion to the picture of Quiché and Maya cultural and history. In this rebuttal to Girard's reply, some pertinent archaeological facts relevant to the Classic period in Highland Guatemala are used to point out weaknesses in Girard's untenable theory that the Quiché-Mayas were responsible for the origin and development of such Mexican high cultures as Classic period Teotihuacán and Postclassic Tula.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , April 1965 , pp. 498 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

De Borhegyi, Stephan F. 1963 Review: Los Mayas Eternos, American Antiquity, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 410–11. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, Rafael 1962 Los Mayas Eternos. Editoies Libro Mex, Mexico. 1964 Reply to de Borhegyi's Review of Los Mayas Eternos, American Antiquity, Vol. 29, No. 4, p. 522. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Laughlin, Robert M. and Coe, Michael D. 1963 Review: Los Mayas Eternos. American Anthropologist, Vol. 65, No. 6, pp. 1372–4. Menasha.Google Scholar