Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T14:34:43.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comment on Ford's Review of Early Formative Period of Coastal Ecuador

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jon D. Muller*
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois

Abstract

Ford"s conclusions that a substantial reevaluation of New World prehistory is required are not fully justified. In the first place, the Valdivia complex has not clearly been shown to be the source for all New World ceramics. Second, the comparisons of Valdivia and Jomon potsherds are not so tightly controlled as Ford indicates. Given the great variety of ceramic decoration in Japan, it is not surprising that many similarities should exist. In addition, the question of ceramic origins is confused with the origins of Neolithic and the question of long-range culture contact.

Type
Facts and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ford, James A. 1966 Early Formative Cultures in Georgia and Florida. American Antiquity, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 78199. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Ford, James A. 1967 Review of “Early Formative Period of Coastal Ecuador,” by Betty J. Meggers, Clifford Evans, and Emilio Estrada. American Antiquity, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 258–9. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Kidder, J. Edward Jr. 1957 The Jorman Pottery of Japan. Artibus Asiae, Ascona, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Meggers, Betty J., Evans, Clifford, and Estrada, Emilio 1965 Early Formative Period of Coastal Ecuador: The Valdivia Machalilla Phases. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology, Vol. 1. Washington.Google Scholar
Reichel-Dolmatoff, Gerardo 1965 Excavaciones arquelogicas en Puerto Hormiga (Departmento de Bolivar). Antropologia 2. Bogota.Google Scholar