Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:55:23.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chronometers and Units in Early Archaeology and Paleontology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

R. Lee Lyman  and
Michael J. O'Brien
R. Lee Lyman
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Michael J. O'Brien
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Early in the nineteenth century, geologist Charles Lyell reasoned that successively older faunas would contain progressively more extinct species and younger faunas relatively more extant species. The present, with one-hundred percent extant species, was the chronological anchor. In archaeology a similar notion underpins the direct historical approach: Successively older cultures will contain progressively fewer of the cultural traits found in extant cultures and relatively more prehistoric traits. As in Lyell’s scheme, the chronological anchor is the present. When A. L. Kroeber invented frequency seriation in the second decade of the twentieth century, he retained the present as a chronological anchor but reasoned that the oldest cultural manifestation would contain the highest percentage of a variant, or what came to be known as a "style," of an ancient trait, and successively younger cultural manifestations would have progressively lower percentages of that variant. The principle of overlapping permitted building sequences of fossils and artifacts, but differences in the units that allowed the chronometers to be operationalized reveal significant epistemological variation in how historical research is undertaken. This variation should be of considerable interest to paleobiologists and archaeologists alike, especially given recent archaeological interest in creating and explaining historical lineages of artifacts.

Resumen

Resumen

A principios del Siglo XIX, el gedlogo Charles Lyell propuso que, sucesivamente, las faunas más antiguas tendrían progresivamente más especies extintas, y las faunas más jóvenes más especies existentes. El presente, con cien por ciento de las especies existentes, era el ancla cronológica. En arqueología una noción similar corrobora el enfoque histórico directo: sucesivamente las culturas más antiguas contendrían progresivamente menos características culturales que las encontradas en culturas existentes, y relativamente más características prehistóricas. Según el esquema de Lyell, el ancla cronológica es el presente. Cuando A. L. Kroeber, en la segunda década del Siglo XX, inventó la seriación de frecuencia, él conservo el presente como un ancla cronologica, pero postulo que la manifestation cultural más antigua contendria el porcentaje más alto de una variante, lo que fue conocido como un "estilo" de una caracteristica antigua. Sucesivamente, las manifestaciones culturales más jovenes tendrían progresivamente porcentajes más bajos de esa variante. El principio de yuxtaposición (superposición) permitió construir secuencias de fósiles y artefactos, pero diferencias en las unidades que permitieron operara los cronómetros, revelan una variatión epistemológica signification en cuanto a cómo conducir la investigatión histórica. Esta variatión sería de considerable interés para arqueólogos y paleobiólogos, especialmente dado el reciente interés arqueológico de crear y explicar los linajes historicos de artefactos.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 65 , Issue 4 , October 2000 , pp. 691 - 707
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Allen, M. S. 1996 Style and Function in East Polynesian Fish-Hooks. Antiquity 10: 91-\\t. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, H. G. 1940 Culture Processes. American Anthropologist 42: 21 –48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, H. G. 1942 Invention and Culture Change. American Anthropologist 44: 14–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohannan, P., and Glazer, M. (editors) 1988 High Points in Anthropology. 2nded. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Brower, J. C, and Burroughs, W. A. 1982 A Simple Method for Quantitative Biostratigraphy. In Quantitative Stratigraphic Correlation, edited by Cubitt, J. M. and Reyment, R.A. pp. 61–83. Wiley, Chichester. England.Google Scholar
Chazan, M. 1995 Conceptions of Time and the Development of Paleolithic Chronology. American Anthropologist 97: 457–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. B. 1932 Archaeology of Mississippi. In Conference on Southern Pre-History, pp. 37–42. National Research Council, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859 On the Origin of Species. Murray, London.Google Scholar
Dunnell, R. C. 1986 Methodological Issues in Americanist Artifact Classification. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 9: 149–207.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. 1979 Alternative Approaches to Evolutionary Theory. In Models and Methodologies in Evolutionary Theory, edited by Schwartz, J. H. and Rollins, H.B. pp. 7–19. Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Bulletin 13. Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N., and Gould, S. J. 1972 Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism. In Models in Paleobiology, edited by M, T. J.. Schopf, pp. 82–115. Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N., and Gould, S. J. 1977 Evolutionary Models and B iostratigraphic Strategies. In Concepts and Methods of Biostratigraphy, edited by Kauffman, E. G. and Hazel, J.E. pp. 25–10. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N., and Novacek, M. J. 1985 Systematics and Paleobiology. Paleobiology 11: 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, J. A. 1938a A Chronological Method Applicable to the Southeast. American Antiquity 3: 260–264.Google Scholar
Ford, J. A. 1938b An Examination of Some Theories and Methods of Ceramic Analysis. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Fox, R. C. 1986 Species in Paleontology. Geoscience Canada 13: 73-84. Transitions. Paleobiology 11: 27–41.Google Scholar
Gordon, A. D., and Reyment, R. A. 1979 Slotting of Borehole Sequences. Journal of the International Association of Mathematical Geology 11: 309–327.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Eldredge, N. 1977 Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered. Paleobiology 3: 115–151.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Eldredge, N. 1986 Punctuated Equilibrium at the Third Stage. Systematic Zoology 35: 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Eldredge, N. 1993 Punctuated Equilibrium Comes of Age. Nature 366: 223–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gould, S. J., Gilinsky, N. L., and German, R. Z. 1987 Asymmetry of Lineages and the Direction of Evolutionary Time. Science 236: 1437–1441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grayson, D. K. 1983 The Establishment of Human Antiquity. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hancock, J. M. 1977 The Historic Development of Concepts of Biostratigraphic Correlation. In Concepts and Methods of Biostratigraphy, edited by Kauffman, E. G. and Hazel, J.E. pp. 3–22. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA. Google Scholar
Harper, C. W., Jr. 1980 Relative Age Inference in Paleontology. Lethaia 13: 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K. W., and Nelson, B. C. 1990 The Utina: Sedations and Chronology. The Florida Anthropologist 43: 48–62.Google Scholar
Kidder, A. V. 1916 Archeological Explorations at Pecos, New Mexico. National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings 2: 119–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidder, A. V. 1924 An Introduction to the Study of Southwestern Archaeology, with a Preliminary Account of the Excavations at Pecos. Papers of the Southwestern Expedition, Phillips Academy No. 1. Andover, MA.Google Scholar
Kidder, M. A., and Kidder, A. V. 1917 Notes on the Pottery of Pecos. American Anthropologist 19: 325–360.Google Scholar
Krieger, A. D. 1944 The Typological Concept. American Antiquity 9: 271–288.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1916a Zuni Culture Sequences. National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings 2: 42–15.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1916b Zuni Potsherds. American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers 18: 1–37.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1931 Historical Reconstruction of Culture Growths and Organic Evolution. American Anthropologist 33: 149–156.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1943 Structure, Function and Pattern in Biology and Anthropology. Scientific Monthly 56: 105–113.Google Scholar
Lipo, C. P., Madsen, M. E., Dunnell, R. C., and Hunt, T. 1997 Population Structure, Cultural Transmission, and Frequency Seriation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 16: 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, M. W. 1993 Ceramic Chronology and Chronometric Dating: Stratigraphy and Seriation at La Blanca Guatemala. Ancient Mesoamerica 4: 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyell, C. 1833 Principles of Geology, vol. Peregrine, P. N.. Murray, London.Google Scholar
Lyell, K. M. 1881 The Life, Letters and Journals of Sir Charles Lyell, vol. 1. Murray, London.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L. 2000 Culture Historical and Biological Approaches to Identifying Homologous Traits. In Function and Style Twenty Years Later, edited by Hurt, T. and Rakita, G.. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT, in press.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L., and O'Brien, M. J. 1998 The Goals of Evolutionary Archaeology: History and Explanation. Current Anthropology 39: 615–652.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L., and O'Brien, M. J. 1999 Americanist Stratigraphic Excavation and the Measurement of Culture Change. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 6: 55–108.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L., and O'Brien, M. J. 2000 Measuring and Explaining Change in Artifact Variation with Clade-Diversity Diagrams. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 19: 39–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, R. L., O'Brien, M. J., and Dunnell, R. C. 1997 The Rise and Fall of Culture History. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L., Wolverton, S., and O'Brien, M. J. 1998 Seriation, Superposition, and Interdigitation: A History of Americanist Graphic Depictions of Culture Change. American Antiquity 63: 239–261.Google Scholar
Mallory, V. S. 1970 Biostratigraphy-A Major Basis for Paleontologic Correlation. In Proceedings of the North American Paleontological Convention, edited by Yochelson, E. L., pp. 553–566. Allen Press, Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar
Marlowe, G. 1999 Year One: Radiocarbon Dating and American Archaeology, 1947-1948. American Antiquity 64: 9–32.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1942 Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1969 Principles of Systematic Zoology. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1982 The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
McKee, J. K., Thackeray, J. F., and Berger, L. R. 1995 Faunal Assemblage Seriation of Southern African Pliocene and Pleistocene Fossil Deposits. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 96: 235–250.Google Scholar
Meltzer, D. J. 1983 The Antiquity of Man and the Development of American Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 6: 1–51.Google Scholar
Meltzer, D. J. 1985 North American Archaeology and Archaeologists 1879-1934. American Antiquity 50: 249–260.Google Scholar
Meltzer, D. J. 1989 A Question of Relevance. In Tracing Archaeology's Past: The Historiography of Archaeology, edited by Christenson, A. L., pp. 5–19. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Neiman, F. D. 1995 Stylistic Variation in Evolutionary Perspective: Implications for Middle Woodland Ceramic Diversity. American Antiquity 60: 7–36.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. C. 1916 Chronology of the Tano Ruins, New Mexico. American Anthropologist 18: 159–180.Google Scholar
Nowlan, G. S. 1986 Paleontology: Ancient and Modern. Geoscience Canada 13: 67–72.Google Scholar
O'Brien, M. J., and Lyman, R. L. 1998 James A. Ford and the Growth of Americanist Archaeology. University of Missouri Press, Columbia.Google Scholar
O'Brien, M. J., and Lyman, R. L. 1999a Seriation, Stratigraphy, and Index Fossils: The Backbone of Archaeological Dating. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
O'Brien, M. J., and Lyman, R. L. 1999b The Bureau of American Ethnology and Its Legacy to Southeastern Archaeology. Journal of the Southwest 41: 407–140.Google Scholar
O'Brien, M. J., and Lyman, R. L. 2000a Applying Evolutionary Archaeology: A Systematic Approach. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
O'Brien, M. J., and Lyman, R. L. 2000b Evolutionary Archaeology: Reconstructing and Explaining Historical Lineages. In Social Theory in Archaeology, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 126–142. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
O'Brien, M. J., and Lyman, R. L. 2000c Darwinian Evolutionism Is Applicable to Historical Archaeology. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 4: 71–112.Google Scholar
O'Connell, J. E, and Inoway, C. M. 1994 Surprise Valley Projectile Points and Their Chronological Implications. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 16: 162–198.Google Scholar
O'Hara, R. J. 1988 Homage to Clio, or, toward an Historical Philosophy for Evolutionary Biology. Systematic Zoology 37: 142–155.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. C. 1963 Contemporaneity and Cross-Dating in Archaeological Interpretation. American Antiquity 28: 389–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, P. N. 1998 Evolutionary Concepts in Biostratigraphy. In Unlocking the Stratigraphical Record: Advances in Modern Stratigraphy, edited by Doyle, P. and Bennett, M.R. pp. 123–144. Wiley, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
Petrie, W. M. F. 1899 Sequences in Prehistoric Remains. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 29: 295–301.Google Scholar
Rafferty, J. 1994 Gradual or Step-Wise Change: The Development of Sedentary Settlement Patterns in Northeast Mississippi. American Antiquity 59: 405–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, K. D., and Bown, T. M. 1986 Gradual Evolution and Species Discrimination in the Fossil Record. In Vertebrates, Phytogeny, and Philosophy, edited by Flanagan, K. M. and Lillegraven, J.A. pp. 119–130. University of Wyoming, Contributions to Geology, Special Paper No. 3. Laramie.Google Scholar
Rouse, I. B. 1939 Prehistory in Haiti: A Study in Method. Yale University Publications in Anthropology No. 21. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Rowe, J. H. 1961 Stratigraphy and Seriation. American Antiquity 26: 324–330.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1978 Charles Lyell's Dream of a Statistical Paleontology. Paleontology 21: 225–244.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1990 Introduction. In (a reprint of the first edition of) Principles of Geology, by Lyell, C., pp. vii–lv. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1996 Cuvier and Brongniart, William Smith, and the Reconstruction of Geohistory. Earth Sciences History 15: 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, J. R. 1981 From de Mortillet to Bordes: A Century of French Palaeolithic Research. In Towards a History of Archaeology, edited by Daniel, G., pp. 85–99. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Spier, L. 1917a An Outline for a Chronology of Zuni Ruins. American Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Papers 18: 207–331.Google Scholar
Spier, L. 1917b Zuni Chronology. National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings 3: 280–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spier, L. 1931 N. C. Nelson's Stratigraphic Technique in the Reconstruction of Prehistoric Sequences in Southwestern America. In Methods in Social Science, edited by Rice, S. A., pp. 275–283. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1979 Macroevolution: Pattern and Process. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M., Addicott, W. O., and Chinzei, K. 1980 Lyellian Curves in Paleontology: Possibilities and Limitations. Geology 8: 422–126.Google Scholar
Steward, J. H. 1929 Diffusion and Independent Invention: A Critique of Logic. American Anthropologist 31: 491–495.Google Scholar
Steward, J. H. 1942 The Direct Historical Approach to Archaeology. American Antiquity 7: 337–343.Google Scholar
Steward, J. H. 1944 Re: Archaeological Tools and Jobs. American Antiquity 10: 99–100.Google Scholar
Stirling, M. W. 1929 Discussion of Mr. Hodge's Paper. In Report of the Conference on Midwestern Archaeology, pp. 24–28. National Research Council, Bulletin 74. Washington, DC. Google Scholar
Stirling, M. W. 1932 The Pre-Historic Southern Indians. In Conference on Southern Pre-History, pp. 20–31. National Research Council, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Strong, W. D. 1935 An Introduction to Nebraska Archeology. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 93(10). Washington, DC. Google Scholar
Taylor, R. E. 1985 The Beginnings of Radiocarbon Dating in American Antiquity: A Historical Perspective. American Antiquity 50: 309–325.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. E. 1987 Radiocarbon Dating: An Archaeological Perspective. Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. 1894 Report on the Mound Explorations of the Bureau of Ethnology. Bureau of Ethnology, Annual Report 12: 3–742.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. H. 1981 How to Classify the Projectile Points from Monitor Valley, Nevada. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 3: 7–3.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. H. 1956 An Archaeological Approach to the Study of Cultural Stability. Society for American Archaeology, Memoir 11: 31–57.Google Scholar
Trueman, E. R. 1979 Species Concept. In The Encyclopedia of Paleontology, edited by Fairbridge, R. W. and Jablonski, D., pp. 764–767. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tylor, E. B. 1881 Anthropology. Watts, London.Google Scholar
Van Riper, A. B. 1993 Men among the Mammoths: Victorian Science and the Discovery of Human Prehistory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Vrba, E. S. 1980 Evolution, Species and Fossils: How Does Life Evolve? South African Journal of Science 76: 61–84.Google Scholar
Wedel, W. R. 1938 The Direct-Historical Approach in Pawnee Archaeology. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 97(7). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R. 1936 A Survey of Methods and Problems in Archaeological Excavation, with Special Reference to the Southwest. Unpublished M. A. thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R., and Phillips, P. 1958 Method and Theory in American Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R., and Sabloff, J. A. 1993 A History of American Archaeology, 3rd ed. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
Wissler, C. 1916 The Application of Statistical Methods to the Data on the Trenton Argillite Culture. American Anthropologist 18: 190–197.Google Scholar
Wissler, C. 1923 Man and Culture. Crowell, New York.Google Scholar
Youngquist, W. 1967 Fossil Systematics. In Essays in Paleontology and Stratigraphy, edited by Teichert, C. and Yochelson, E.L. pp. 57–62. University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar