Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:20:09.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brazilian Archaeology in 1968: An Interim Report on the National Program of Archaeological Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Pronapa
Pronapa
Affiliation:
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisas Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and Smithsonian InstitutionWashington, D. C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Brazil can be divided into two geographical areas: the Coastal Strip and the Amazon Basin. Coordinated systematic survey and testing on the Coastal Strip between 1965-68 shows the Preceramic period to have lasted until about A.D. 500 except in an enclave on the Bahia Coast, where the Periperi ceramic tradition dates from the ninth century B.C. Although a variety of preceramic complexes has been recognized, particularly in the south, primary attention has been placed on the ceramic period. Seven regional ceramic traditions have been identified, and these appear to be generally contemporary with the area-wide Tupiguarani tradition. The latter is divisible into three subtraditions: the earliest emphasizes painted decoration; the second, corrugation; and the most recent, brushing. Subsequent to European contact, a Neo-Brazilian ceramic tradition developed, in which aboriginal and European traits are amalgamated.

Although the archaeology of the Amazon Basin is more poorly known, none of the existing data shows any evidence of contact with the occupants of the Coastal Strip, or vice versa. The strength of the ecological barrier between the two areas is reflected in the affiliation of complexes on the upper Rio Xingú, on the ecological border, with the Amazonian Incised and Punctate tradition, and in the total lack of any features suggesting contact with cultures of the Coastal Strip.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , January 1970 , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BóRmida, Amalia Sanguinetti De 1965 Dispersión y características de las principales industrias precerámicas del territorio argentine Etnia , Vol. 1, pp. 6–20. Olavarría, Pcia. de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Calderon, Valentin 1964 O Sambaqui da Pedra Oca. Instituto de Ciências Sociais 2. Universidade da Bahia, Salvador.Google Scholar
Emperaire, J. and Laming, A. 1956 Les Sambaquis de la Cête Méridionale du Brésil. Journal de la Société des Americanistes, Vol. 45, pp. 5–163. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Clifford and Meggers, Betty J. 1968 Archeological Investigations on the Rio Napo, Eastern Ecuador. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology, Vol. 6. Washington.Google Scholar
Ford, James A. 1962 A Quantitative Method for Deriving Cultural Chronology. Technical Manual No. 1, Pan American Union. Washington.Google Scholar
Hilbert, Peter Paul 1959 Achados Arqueológicos num Sambaquí do Baixo Amazonas. Instituto de Antropologia e Etnologia do Vará, Publ. 10. Belém.Google Scholar
Hilbert, Peter Paul 1968 Archäologische Untersuchungen am mittleren Amazonas. Marburger Studien zur Völkerkunde 1. Berlin.Google Scholar
Hurt, Wesley R. 1964 Recent Radiocarbon Dates for Central and Southern Brazil. American Antiquity, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 25–33. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meggers, Betty J. and Evans, Clifford 1957 Archeological Investigations at the Mouth of the Amazon. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 167. Washington.Google Scholar
Meggers, Betty J. and Evans, Clifford 1961 An Experimental Formulation of Horizon Styles in the Tropical Forest Area of South America. In Essays in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology, by S. K. Lothrop and others, pp. 372–88. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pronapa, 1967 Programa Nacional de Pesquisas Arqueológicas, Resultados Preliminares do Primeiro Ano, 1965–1966. Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Publicações Avulsas No. 6. Belém.Google Scholar
Pronapa, 1969a Programa Nacional de Pesquisas Arqueológicas, Resultados Preliminares do Segundo Ano, 1966–1966. Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Publicoções Avulsas No. 10. Belém.Google Scholar
Pronapa, 1969b Programa Nacional de Pesquisas Arqueológicas, Resultados Preliminares do Terceiro Ano, 1967–1968. Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, Publicoções Avulsas No. 13. Belém.Google Scholar
Schmitz, Pedro Ignacio and Others 1967 Arqueologia no Rio Grande do Sul. Pesquisas, Antropologia 16, Institute Anchietano de Pesquisas, São Leopoldo.Google Scholar
Simões, Mario F. 1969 The Castanheira Site: New Evidence on the Washington, D. C Antiquity and History of the Ananatuba Phase (Marajó Island, Brazil). American Antiquity, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 402–10. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar