Article contents
Binford's Hunting Stand Hypothesis and the Joint Site
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
Lewis R. Binford has recently disputed the inference, advanced in Behavioral Archeology, that the inhabitants of the Joint Site hunted more often during the last years of the site's occupation. As an alternative he suggests that the site was used after abandonment as a hunting camp. These conclusions, which stem from a misunderstanding of the nature and purpose of the analytic units employed in the Joint Site study, are shown to be without substantial foundation.
- Type
- Comments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1983
References
References Cited
Binford, Lewis R.
1981
Behavioral archaeology and the “Pompeii premise.”
Journal of Anthropological Research
37:195–208.Google Scholar
Hanson, John A., and Schiffer, Michael B.
1975
The Joint Site—a preliminary report. Fieldiana: Anthropology
65:47–91.Google Scholar
Reid, J. Jefferson
1973 Growth and response to stress at Grasshopper Pueblo, Arizona. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Reid, J. Jefferson, B. Schiffer, Michael, and M. Neff, Jeffrey
1975
Archaeological considerations of intrasite samplíng. In Sampling in archaeology, edited by Mueller, James W., pp. 209–224. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B.
1973
The chipped-stone assemblage from the Joint Site. Ms. on deposit, Arizona State Museum Library, Tucson.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B.
1975
Behavioral chain analysis: activities, organization, and the use of space. Fieldiana: Anthropology
65:103–119.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by