Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:32:13.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Willow Smoke and Dogs’ Tails: A Comment on Binford's Analysis of Hunter-Gatherer Settlement Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Polly Wiessner
Polly Wiessner*
Affiliation:
Institut for Forhistorisk Arkaeologi, Århus Universitet, Moesgaard, DK-8270, Højbjerg, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is suggested that archaeologists would benefit by conceiving organizational variation in hunter-gatherer societies to be the result of both organization around resources and organization around other persons in social relations of production. This approach allows for predictions to be made about the patterning of material remains which are the products of intergroup and intragroup interaction, such as internal site structure, profiles of exchange, stylistic variation in artifacts, etc. To illustrate this point, I outline a number of social strategies for reducing risk in social and natural resources and derive hypotheses about their material correlates. While I emphasize the importance of understanding these strategies within a framework of adaptation, I question whether it is possible to predict strategies of organization from environmental variables alone.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , January 1982 , pp. 171 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Binford, Lewis R. 1978 Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1980 Willow smoke and dogs’ tails: hunter-gatherer settlement systems and archaeological site formation. American Antiquity 45:4–20.Google Scholar
Brooks, Alison 1980 A Note on the Late Stone Age features at ≠ Gi: analogies from historic San hunting practices. Botswana Notes and Records 10:1–3.Google Scholar
Crowell, A. L., and Hitchcock, R. K. 1980 Barsarwa ambush hunting in Botswana. Botswana Notes and Records 10:37–51.Google Scholar
Freuchen, Peter 1962 Peter Freuchen's book of Eskimos. The World Publishing Co., New York.Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim 1980 Hunters, pastoralists and ranchers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Meillassoux, Claude 1973 On the mode of production of the hunting band. In French perspectives in African studies, edited by Alexandre, P., pp. 187–204. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Piddocke, Stuart 1969 The potlatch system of the southern Kwakuitl: a new perspective. In Environment and cultural behavior, edited by Vayda, A. P., pp. 130–156. Natural History Press, Garden City, New York.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Knud 1905 Nye Mennesker. Køibenhavn og Kristiania, København.Google Scholar
Riegel, R., and Miller, J. S. 1959 Insurance principles and practices. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall 1972 Stone age economics. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sbrzesny, Heide 1976 Die Spiele der !Ko-Buschleute. R. Piper & Co., München.Google Scholar
Slodbokin, Richard 1962 Band organization of the Peel River Kutchin. Bulletin of the National Museum of Canada 179. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Spencer, Robert F. 1959 The north Alaskan Eskimo: a study in ecology and society. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin 171. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Suttles, Wayne 1968 Coping with abundance: subsistence on the Northwest Coast. In Man the hunter, edited by Lee, R. B. and DeVore, I., pp. 56–68. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Thalbitzer, William (editor) 1914 The Ammassilik Eskimo. Meddelelser om GrjSnland 40, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Tindale, Norman B. 1972 The Pitjandjara. In Hunters and gatherers today, edited by Bicchieri, M., pp. 217–268. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Turnbull, Colin M. 1965 Wayward servants. The two worlds of the African Pygmies. Natural History Press, Garden City, N.J.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Hitoshi 1972 The Ainu. In Hunters and gatherers today, edited by Bicchieri, M., pp. 451–484. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.Google Scholar
White, T. E. 1952 Observations on the butchering techniques of some aboriginal peoples, no. 1. American Antiquity 17:337–338.Google Scholar
White, T. E. 1953 Observations on the butchering techniques of some aboriginal peoples, no. 2. American Antiquity 19:160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T. E. 1954 Observations on the butchering techniques of some aboriginal peoples, nos. 3-6. American Antiquity 19:254–264.Google Scholar
White, T. E. 1955 Observations on the butchering techniques of some aboriginal peoples, nos. 7-9. American Antiquity 21:170–178.Google Scholar
Wiessner, Polly 1977 Hxaro: A regional system of reciprocity for reducing risk among the IKung San. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Wiessner, Polly 1980a Risk, reciprocity and social influence on !Kung San economies. In Politics and history in band societies, edited by Leacock, E. R. and Lee, R. B.. Cambridge University Press, London, in press.Google Scholar
Wiessner, Polly 1980b Stylistic variation in Kalahari San projectile points. Ms. in possession of the author.Google Scholar
Williams, Bobby Jo 1968a The Birhor of India and some comments on band organization. In Man the hunter, edited by Lee, R. B. and DeVore, I., pp. 126–137. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Williams, Bobby Jo 1968b Establishing cultural heterogeneities in settlement patterns: an ethnographic example. In New perspectives in archaeology, edited by Binford, S. R. and Binford, L. R., pp. 161–170. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Yellen, John E. 1977a Archaeological approaches to the present. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Yellen, John E. 1977b Cultural patterning in faunal remains: evidence from the IKung Bushmen. In Experimental archaeology, edited by Ingersoll, D. W., John E., Yellen, and William, MacDonald, pp. 271–331. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar