Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:13:28.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaeological Survey Design, Units of Observation, and the Characterization of Regional Variability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Alan P. Sullivan III ,
Philip B. Mink II  and
Patrick M. Uphus
Alan P. Sullivan III
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0380 ([email protected])
Philip B. Mink II
Affiliation:
Kentucky Archaeological Survey and Department of Anthropology, University of Kentucky, 1020-A Export Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40506-9854
Patrick M. Uphus
Affiliation:
Gray and Pape, Inc., 1318 Main Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is generally presumed that intensive survey yields reliable representations of regional archaeological variability. We evaluate this assumption with an analysis of the results of two intensive surveys of the same terrain in the Upper Basin, a heavily forested upland ecosystem located south of Grand Canyon National Park in Kaibab National Forest, northern Arizona. By comparing differences between the results of site-based surveys with those of mapping-unit-based surveys, we demonstrate that units of observation have a profound effect on how archaeological landscapes and their variability are characterized and interpreted. In addition, results of four analyses of survey data show that the archaeological resource inventories created by the application of these two different units of observation cannot be reconciled. We suggest that because some units of observation may be more appropriate for certain problems and for different kinds of surface and near-surface archaeological records, additional studies of the effects of units of observation on characterizing the archaeological content of the same terrain should become a research priority in survey archaeology. Without such studies, the identification of archaeologically sensitive areas, particularly those that necessitate active management and vigilant protection on public lands, will be underdetermined, thereby placing those heritage properties at risk.

Résumé

Résumé

Generalmente se presume que la prospección intensiva provee representaciones confiables de la variabilidad arqueológica regional. Nosotros evaluamos esta presunción con un análisis de los resultados the dos prospecciones intensivas del mismo terreno en la Alta Cuenca, un ecosistema de bosque localizado al sur del Parque Nacional del Gran Cañon, en el Bosque Nacional Kaibab de Arizona septentrional. Una comparación de las diferencias entre resultados de las prospecciones de sitio con aquéllas de unidades cartográficas demuestra que las unidades de observacion tienen un effecto profundo en la manera de caracterizar e interpretar variabilidad en los paisajes arqueológicos. Además, los resultados de cuatro análisis de datos de prospección demuestran que los inventarios de recursos arqueológicos creados con la aplicación de estas dos differentes unidades de observación no son comparables. Debido a que las unidades de observación deben elegirse de acuerdo con el tipo de registro de superficie, sugerimos que los estudios de effectos de tipos de prospección son de prioridad. Sin estos estudios, la identificación de areas arqueológicamente sensitivas, en particular las que necesitan vigilancia y manejo activo en áreas públicas, será expuesta al riesgo de perjudicar el patrimonio cultural.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 322 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Alcock, Susan E., and Cherry, John F. (editors) 2004 Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxbow Books, Oxford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Almagro-Gorbea, Martín, Alonso, Pablo, Benito, José Enrique, Martín, Ana M., and Valencia, José Luis 2002 Statistical Quality Control in Archaeological Survey. Archaeological Prospection 9:45–53.Google Scholar
Anderson, Bruce A. (compiler) 1990 The Wupatki Archeological Inventory Survey Project: Final Report. Southwest Cultural Resources Center Professional Paper No. 35. National Park Service, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Andrews, Gill, Barrett, John C., and Lewis, John S. C. 2000 Interpretation Not Record: The Practice of Archaeology. Antiquity 74:525–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babenroth, D. L., and Strahler, A. N. 1945 Geomorphology and Structure of the East Kaibab Monocline, Arizona and Utah. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America 56:107–150.Google Scholar
Banning, Edward B. 2002 Archaeological Survey. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banning, Edward B., Hawkins, A. L., and Stewart, S. T. 2006 Detection Functions for Archaeological Survey. American Antiquity 71:723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, Andrew, and Conolly, James 2004 GIS, Archaeological Survey, and Landscape Archaeology on the Island of Kythera, Greece. Journal of Field Archaeology 29:123–138.Google Scholar
Brewer, D. G., Jorgensen, R. K., Munk, L. P., Robbie, W. A., and Travis, J. L. 1991 Terrestrial Ecosystems Survey of the Kaibab National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Burger, Oskar, Todd, Lawrence C., Burnett, Paul, Stohlgren, Tomas J., and Stephens, Doug 2004 Multi-Scale and Nested-Intensity Sampling Techniques for Archaeological Survey. Journal of Field Archaeology 29:409–423.Google Scholar
Camilli, Eileen L., and Ebert, James I. 1992 Artifact Reuse and Recycling in Continuous Surface Distributions and Implications for Interpreting Land Use Patterns. In Space, Time, and Archaeological Landscapes, edited by Jacqueline Rossignol and LuAnn Wandsnider, pp. 113–136. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cole, Kenneth L. 1990 Late Quaternary Vegetation Gradients through the Grand Canyon. In Packrat Middens, edited by Julio L. Betancourt, Thomas R. Van Devender, and Paul S. Martin, pp. 240–258. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Collins, James M., and Molyneaux, Brian Leigh 2003 Archaeological Survey. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Davis, Jack L. 2004 Are the Landscapes of Greek Prehistory Hidden? A Comparative Approach. In Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World, edited by Susan E. Alcock and John F. Cherry, pp. 22–35. Oxbow Books, Oxford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Dunnell, Robert C. 1992 The Notion Site. In Space, Time, and Archaeological Landscapes, edited by Jacqueline Rossignol and LuAnn Wandsnider, pp. 21–41. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dunnell, Robert C., and Dancey, William S. 1983 The Siteless Survey: A Regional Scale Data Collection Strategy. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 4, edited by Michael B. Schiffer, pp. 267–287. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ebert, James I. 1992 Distributional Archaeology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Ebert, James I., Camilli, Eileen L., and Berman, Michael J. 1996 GIS in the Analysis of Distributional Archaeological Data. In New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, edited by Herbert D. G. Maschner, pp. 25–37. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute) 1996 Arcview 3.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California.Google Scholar
Evans, John G. 2003 Environmental Archaeology and the Social Order. Roudedge, London.Google Scholar
Hanson, Norwood R. 1967 Observation and Interpretation. In Philosophy of Science Today, edited by Sidney Morgenbesser, pp. 90–99. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Huntoon, Peter W. 1990 Phanerozoic Structural Geology of the Grand Canyon. In Grand Canyon Geology, edited by S. S. Beus and M. Morales, pp. 261–309. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jenness, Jeff 2004 Nearest Features v.3.8a, Arcview 3.2 (extension). Electronic document, www.jennessent.com/arcview/nearest_features.htm, accessed June 29, 2005.Google Scholar
King, Thomas 2004 Cultural Resource Laws and Practice: An Introductory Guide. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, California.Google Scholar
Kantner, John 2005 Regional Analysis in Archaeology. In Handbook of Archaeological Methods, vol. II, edited by Herbert D. G. Maschner and Christopher Chippindale, pp. 1179–1224. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Kohler, Timothy A. 2004 Introduction. In Archaeology of Bandelier National Monument: Village Formation on the Pajarito Plateau, New Mexico, edited by Timothy A. Kohler, pp. 1–17. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Mattingly, David, and Witcher, Rob 2004 Mapping the Roman World: The Contribution of Field Survey Data. In Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World, edited by Susan E. Alcock and John F. Cherry, pp. 173–186. Oxbow Books, Oxford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
McManamon, Francis P. 2005 Managing Archaeological Resources. In Handbook of Archaeological Methods, Vol. II, edited by Herbert D. G. Maschner and Christopher Chippindale, pp. 1227–1269. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Molyneaux, Brian L. 2005 Archaeological Survey. In Handbook of Archaeological Methods, vol. I, edited by Herbert D. G. Maschner and Christopher Chippindale, pp. 106–132. AltaMira Press, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Plog, Fred 1983 Study Area 1: Kaibab National Forest. In Theory and Model Building: Refining Survey Strategies for Locating Prehistoric Heritage Resources, edited by Linda S. Cordell and Dee F. Green, pp. 63–66. Cultural Resources Document No. 3. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Plog, Stephen 1986 The Survey Strategy. In Spatial Organization and Exchange: Archaeological Survey on Northern Black Mesa, edited by Stephen Plog, pp. 32–49. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Rice, Glen, Effland, Rick, and Blank-Roper, Laurie 1980 A Sample Survey of Tusayan Planning Unit 1, Kaibab National Forest, Arizona. Cultural Resources Report No. 33. USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., Sullivan, Alan P. III, and Klinger, Timothy C. 1978 The Design of Archaeological Surveys. WorldArchaeology 10:1–28.Google Scholar
Shull, Carol D. 2002 Irreplaceable Heritage: Archaeology and the National Register of Historic Places. In Public Benefits of Archaeology, edited by Barbara J. Little, pp. 195–201. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Alan P. III 1992 Investigating the Archaeological Consequences of Short Duration Occupations. American Antiquity 57:99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Alan P. III 1995 Artifact Scatters and Subsistence Organization. Journal of Field Archaeology 22:49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Alan P. III 1996 Risk, Anthropogenic Environments, and Western Anasazi Subsistence. In Evolving Complexity and Environmental Risk in the Prehistoric Southwest, edited by Joseph A. Tainter and Bonnie B. Tainter, pp. 145–167. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Alan P. III 2000 Theory of Archaeological Survey Design. In Archaeological Method and Theory: An Encyclopedia, edited by Linda Ellis, pp. 600–605. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Alan P. III (editor) 2003 Archaeological Survey Methodology and Results. National Technical Information Service Report No. FHWA/OH-2003/020. Springfield, Virginia.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Alan P. III, and Ruter, Anthony H. 2006 The Effects of Environmental Fluctuations on Ancient Livelihood: Implications of Paleoeconomic Data from the Upper Basin. In Environmental Change and Human Adaptation in the Ancient Southwest, edited by David E. Doyel and Jeffrey S. Dean, pp. 180–203. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Alan P. III, Mink, Philip B. II, and Uphus, Patrick M. 2002 From John W. Powell to Robert C. Euler: Testing Models of Grand Canyon’s Prehistoric Puebloan Settlement History. In Culture and Environment in the American Southwest: Essays in Honor of Robert C. Euler, edited by David A. Phillips Jr. and John A. Ware, pp. 49–68. Anthropological Research Paper Number 8. SWCA, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Alan R. III, Cook, Robert A., Purtill, Matthew P., and Uphus, Patrick M. 2003 Economic and Land-Use Implications of Prehistoric Fire-Cracked-Rock Piles, Northern Arizona. Journal of Field Archaeology 28:367–382.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Alan P. III, McNamee, Calla, Ruter, Anthony H., and Uphus, Patrick M. 2003 Floods and Anthropogenic Environments: Geoarchaeology of a Flood-Prone Upland Alluvial Sequence. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Chacmool Conference, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Sunderhaus, Ted S. 2004 Patterning in the Distribution of Surface Exposed Architecture and Artifacts at Fort Ancient: Results of an Intensive Pedestrian Survey. In The Fort Ancient Earthworks: Prehistoric Lifeways of the Hopewell Culture in Southwestern Ohio, edited by Robert P. Connolly and Bradley T. Lepper, pp. 137–146. Ohio Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Tainter, Joseph A. 1998 Surface Archaeology: Perceptions, Values, and Potential. In Surface Archaeology, edited by Alan P. Sullivan, III, pp. 169–179. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Terrenato, Nicola 2004 Sample Size Matters! The Paradox of Global Trends and Local Surveys. In Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World, edited by Susan E. Alcock and John F Cherry, pp. 36–48. Oxbow Books, Oxford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Thompson, Nicholas C. 2003 From Data Recovery to Data Analysis: Projectile Points of the Upper Basin, Kaibab National Forest, Northern Arizona. MA thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Thompson, Stephen 2004 Side-by-Side and Back-to-Front: Exploring Intra-Regional Latitudinal and Longitudinal Comparability in Survey Data. Three Case Studies from Metaponto, Southern Italy. In Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World, edited by Susan E. Alcock and John F. Cherry, pp. 65–85. Oxbow Books, Oxford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Uphus, Patrick M. 2003 The Influences of Ecosystem Variability on Prehistoric Settlement: Testing Terrain-Based Locational Models for the Upper Basin, Northern Arizona. MA thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Uphus, Patrick M., Sullivan, Alan P. III, and Mink, Philip B. II 2006 Identifying At-Risk Heritage Resources with GIS: Modeling the Impact of Recreational Activities on the Archaeological Record. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management 6:330–343.Google Scholar
Wandsnider, LuAnn 1998 Regional Scale Processes and Archaeological Landscape Units. In Units in Archaeology: Measuring Time, Space, and Material, edited by Ann F. Ramenofsky and Anastasia Steffen, pp. 87–102. University of Utah Press. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Wandsnider, LuAnn, and Camilli, Eileen L. 1992 The Character of Surface Deposits and Its Influence on Survey Adequacy. Journal of Field Archaeology 19:169–188.Google Scholar
Wandsnider, LuAnn, and Camilli, Eileen L. 1996 Land-Use Histories from the Mesilla Bolson (South-Central New Mexico): Evidence from Spatial Patterning in Surface Artifact Distributions. In Interpreting Southwestern Diversity: Underlying Principles and Overarching Patterns, edited by Paul R. Fish and J. Jefferson Reid, pp. 211–239. Anthropological Research Paper No. 48. Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Wenker, Chris T., and Herhahn, Cynthia 2004 Field Methods and Research Design. In Bryce Canyon National Park: Archeology of the Paunsaugunt Plateau, edited by Chris T. Wenker, pp. 37–51. Intermountain Cultural Resources Management Professional Paper No. 69. National Park Service, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Whalen, Michael E. 1990 Sampling Versus Full-Coverage Survey: An Example from Western Texas. In The Archaeology of Regions: A Case for Full-Coverage Survey, edited by Suzanne K. Fish and Stephen A. Kowalewski, pp. 219–236. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Wilcox, David R. 1999 A Peregrine View of Macroregional Systems in the North American Southwest, A.D. 750–1250. In Great Towns and Regional Polities in the Prehistoric Southwest and Southeast, edited by Jill E. Neitzel, pp. 115–141. Amerind Foundation, Dragoon, Arizona, and University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Wilcox, David R. 2005 Big Picture Archaeology. Plateau: The Land and People of the Colorado Plateau 2:16–27.Google Scholar
Wright, James C. 2004 Comparative Settlement Patterns during the Bronze Age in the Northeastern Peloponnesos, Greece. In Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World, edited by Susan E. Alcock and John F. Cherry, pp. 114–131. Oxbow Books, Oxford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar