Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:56:42.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Archaeological Survey of the Blowouts of Yuma County, Colorado

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Paul H. Gebhard
Paul H. Gebhard*
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ever since Yuma points were recognized as being particularly ancient, Yuma County, Colorado has been a logical area of interest. Nevertheless, until 1941 the county had received scant attention from professional archaeologists, with the sole exception of a partial surface survey by Dr. E. B. Renaud. On the other hand, there had been considerable collecting by local residents, most particularly by Perry and Harold Andersen of Yuma, Colorado, who have amassed a large and valuable collection including numerous Folsom and Yuma points.

In 1941 Yuma County was still liberally spotted with blowouts resulting from wind erosion of the sandy soil consequent upon the previous drought. Conditions were, for the archaeologist, optimal. Thanks to Dr. Donald Scott, who arranged that expenses be defrayed by the Peabody Museum of Harvard University, my wife and I were enabled to spend part of the summer and early fall in Yuma County and adjacent portions of other counties.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , October 1949 , pp. 132 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gebhard, Paul H. 1946. Stone Objects from Prehistoric North America with Respect to Distribution, Type, and Significance. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harrington, M. R. 1920. “Certain Caddo Sites in Arkansas.” Indian Notes and Monographs, Miscellaneous Series, Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation, Vol. 10. New York.Google Scholar
Howard, Edgar B. 1943. “The Finley Site: Discovery of Yuma Points, in situ, near Eden, Wyoming.” American Antiquity, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 224–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulloy, W. 1942. “The Hagen Site: a Prehistoric Village on the Lower Yellowstone.” University of Montana Publications in the Social Sciences, No. 1. n.d. Unpublished MS on Ghost and Pictograph Caves, Montana.Google Scholar
Rinaldo, J. 1941. An Analysis of Prehistoric Anasazi Culture Change. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
Renaud, E. B. 1931. “Prehistoric Flaked Points from Colorado and Neighboring Districts.” Proceedings of the Colorado Museum of Natural History, Vol. 10, No. 2. Denver.Google Scholar
Renaud, E. B. 1932. Archaeological Survey of Eastern Colorado. Second Report. Denver: Department of Anthropology, University of Denver.Google Scholar
Scoggin, Charles 1940. “Folsom and Nepesta Points.” American Antiquity, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 290–8.Google Scholar
Steward, J. 1937. “Ancient Caves of the Great Salt Lake Region.” Bulletin, Bureau of American Ethnology, No. 116. WashingtonGoogle Scholar
Strong, W. 1935. “An Introduction to Nebraska Archaeology.” Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 93, No. 10. Washington.Google Scholar
Wedel, W. R. 1943. “Archaeological Investigations in Platte and Clay Counties, Missouri.” Bulletin, U. S. National Museum, No. 183. Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar