Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T11:43:39.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Alibates Flint Quarry, Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James B. Shaeffer
James B. Shaeffer*
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma, Norman, Okla.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been thought that one of the most easily recognized types of flint used in the manufacture of stone tools in the Southern Plains is Amarillo or Alibates flint (Kidder 1932: 31, 44; Krieger 1946: 50, 62; Skinner 1956: 13). This flint has been widely recognized in Texas, central and western Oklahoma, southern Kansas, eastern Colorado and western New Mexico (Watson 1950: 32; Bell and Baerreis 1951: 84; Suhm and Krieger 1954: 71). The material has been dated as early as Folsom and as late as protohistoric (Roberts 1942: 18; Schmidt and Toldan 1953: 173; Baker, Campbell, and Evans 1957: 2).

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , October 1958 , pp. 189 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, W. E., Campbell, T. N., and Evans, G. L. 1957 The Nail Site: Evidence of Early Man in the Oklahoma Panhandle. Oklahoma Anthropological Society Bulletin, Vol. 5, pp. 1–20. Oklahoma City.Google Scholar
Bell, R. E. and Baerreis, D. A. 1951 A Survey of Oklahoma Archaeology. Texas Archaeological and Paleontological Society Bulletin, Vol. 22, pp. 7–100. Austin.Google Scholar
Bryan, Kirk 1950, Flint Quarries — the Sources of Tools and, at the same time, the Factories of the American Indian, with a Consideration of the Theory of the “Blank” and some of the Technique of Flint Utilization. Papers of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vol. 17, No. 3. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kidder, A. V. 1932 The Artifacts of Pecos. Papers of the Phillips Academy, Southwestern Expedition, No. 6. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Krieger, A. D. 1946 Culture Complexes and Chronology in Northern Texas, with Extension of Puebloan Datings to the Mississippi Valley. University of Texas Publication, No. 4640. Austin.Google Scholar
Roberts, F. H. H. Jr. 1942 Archeological and Geological Investigations in the San Jon District, Eastern New Mexico. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 103, No. 4. Washington.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Karl and Toldan, Raymond Jr. 1953 The Brown Site, Gd–1, Grady County, Oklahoma. Texas Archaeological Society Bulletin, Vol. 24, pp. 139–76, Austin.Google Scholar
Skinner, H. C. 1956 Nomenclature, Origin and Occurrence of Flint. Oklahoma Anthropological Society Bulletin, Vol. 4, pp. 13–19. Oklahoma City.Google Scholar
Studer, F. V. 1931 Some Field Notes and Observations Concerning Texas Panhandle Ruins. In Archaeology of the Arkansas River Valley, by Moorehead, W. K., pp. 131–41. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Suhm, D. A. and Krieger, A. D. 1954 An Introductory Handbook of Texas Archaeology. Texas Archaeological Society Bulletin, Vol. 25. Austin.Google Scholar
Watson, Virginia 1950 The Optima Focus of the Panhandle Aspect: Description and Analysis. Texas Archaeological and Paleontological Society Bulletin, Vol. 22, pp. 7–68. Austin.Google Scholar