Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:02:16.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Administration of Contract Emergency Archaeological Programs*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jesse D. Jennings*
Affiliation:
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

Abstract

Contract emergency research is seen as sharing essentially the same limitations as other emergency work. These are: the pressure of time; an arbitrary restriction of geographic area of study; the obligation to sample adequately the full range of cultures represented; and the possible problem of dealing with a large volume of data. The contract also carries with it a stipulated deadline for the completion of an acceptable report. All of these limitations are seen as advantageous.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

After this paper was written I received and read the excellent symposium in Archaeology, Vol. 14, No. 4, called SOS, and the paper, A Guide for Salvage Archaeology by Fred Wendorf (Museum of New Mexico Press, 1962). Many of the ideas in these publications are parallel to some that I express independently in this paper. I wish here merely to acknowledge my awareness of the similarity of our conclusions and express my appreciation of the publications mentioned.

This paper was given at a symposium entitled “Administrative Problems in Emergency Archaeology” at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Tucson, Arizona, May 3–5, 1962.

References

* After this paper was written I received and read the excellent symposium in Archaeology, Vol. 14, No. 4, called SOS, and the paper, A Guide for Salvage Archaeology by Fred Wendorf (Museum of New Mexico Press, 1962). Many of the ideas in these publications are parallel to some that I express independently in this paper. I wish here merely to acknowledge my awareness of the similarity of our conclusions and express my appreciation of the publications mentioned.

This paper was given at a symposium entitled “Administrative Problems in Emergency Archaeology” at the 27th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Tucson, Arizona, May 3–5, 1962.