Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T13:55:15.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adena Pottery1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

James B. Griffin
James B. Griffin*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For many years the Adena aspect has been one of the best known prehistoric cultures in the Ohio Valley. The type site was excavated by Dr. W. C. Mills of the Ohio State Museum at the beginning of the twentieth century. At that time, however, it was thought to be a burial place of Fort Ancient peoples. This opinion was not outmoded until the publication of the results of the excavation of the Westenhaver mound by Dr. Mills in which he, for the first time, set forth the concept of an Adena culture as distinct from both Hopewell and Fort Ancient. A list of traits distinctive of the Adena culture was published by Mr. H. C. Shetrone in which no mention was made of the pottery associated with the culture. In a more comprehensive publication by the same author, little attention was paid to the ceramic remains because of the paucity of data. The last statement regarding the presence or absence of pottery in Adena is that of Dr. E. F. Greenman : complete pottery vessels and pottery sherds are here considered as separate cultural items and are placed in Table C, containing traits not characteristic of the Adena culture.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , April 1942 , pp. 344 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1942

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper was originally presented before the Michigan Academy of Arts, Science, and Letters in March, 1939.

References

Andrews, E. B. 1877. “Report of Explorations of Mounds in Southeastern Ohio.” Tenth Annual Report of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, pp. 51-74.Google Scholar
Bache, Charles and Satterthwaite, Linton 1930. “The Excavation of an Indian Mound at Beech Bottom, West Virginia.” The Museum Journal, Vol. 21, Nos. 3-4. Museum of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Black, Glenn A. 1936. Excavation of the Nowlin Mound. Indiana History Bulletin, Vol. 13, No. 7.Google Scholar
Fowke, Gerard 1902. Archaeological History of Ohio. Google Scholar
Fowke, Gerard 1928. Archaeological Investigations—11. Bureau of American Ethnology, Fortyfourth Annual Report.Google Scholar
Fowke, Gerard and Moorehead, W. K. 1894. “Recent Mound Exploration in Ohio.” Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1894, Part 11, pp. 308–321.Google Scholar
Greenman, E. F. 1932. “Excavation of the Coon Mound and an Analysis of the Adena Culture.” Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 3.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B. 1936. “Notes on the Potter.” in Black, 1936.Google Scholar
N. D. “The Fort Ancient Aspect: Its Cultural and Chronological Position in Mississippi Valley Archaeology.” In press.Google Scholar
Haag, W. G. 1941. “A description of the Wright Site pottery.” In Webb, W. S., The Wright Mounds, University of Kentucky Reports in Anthropology, 1940, Vol. 5, No. 1.Google Scholar
Homsher, G. W. 1884. The Glidwell Mound, Franklin County, Indiana. Annual Report of the Smithsonian Institution for 1882, pp. 721–728.Google Scholar
Marsh, O. C. 1866. “Description of an Ancient Sepulchral Mound near Newark, Ohio.” The American Journal of Sciences and Arts, Vol. 42, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Mills, T. B. 1919. “The Ulrich Group of Mounds.” Certain Mounds and Village Sites in Ohio. Columbus. Vol. 3, Pt. 2.Google Scholar
Mills, W. C. 1902. “Excavations of the Adena Mound.” Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 4.Google Scholar
Mills, W. C. 1917. “Explorations of the Westenhaver Mound.” Ohio Archaeological and Historical Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 2.Google Scholar
Miner, Horace 1936. “The Importance of Textiles in the Archaeology of the Eastern United States.” American Antiquity, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 181–192.Google Scholar
Moorehead, W. K. 1892. Primitive Man in Ohio. New York.Google Scholar
Putnam, F. W. 1884. “Seventeenth Report of the Curator.” Annual Reports of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, pp. 342–343.Google Scholar
Putnam, F. W. 1890. “The Serpent Mound of Ohio.” Century Magazine, Vol. 39, No. 6.Google Scholar
Setzler, F. M. 1930. “The Archaeology of the Whitewater Valley.” Indiana History Bulletin, Vol. 7, No. 12.Google Scholar
Shetrone, H. C. 1920. “Culture Problem in Ohio Archaeology.” American Anthropologist, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 144–172.Google Scholar
Shetrone, H. C. 1931. The Mound Builders. New York.Google Scholar
Thomas, Cyrus 1894. Report on the Mound Explorations of the Bureau of Ethnology. Bureau of American Ethnology, Twelfth Annual Report.Google Scholar