Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:40:11.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Viru Valley Sequence: A Critical Review*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

J. A. Bennyhoff
J. A. Bennyhoff*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The viru valley Project of 1946 was undertaken as an intensive and integrated study focusing the research of a number of anthropologists on the problems of a single, relatively small valley on the north coast of Peru. The ideal of the project was an analysis of the cultural history and prehistory of the Viru Valley from the time of earliest human occupation to the present. The final reports of the participants are now beginning to appear (Ford and Willey, 1949; Ford, 1949; Bennett, 1950) and these document the very substantial success of the project.

Type
Review Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , January 1952 , pp. 231 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The author is indebted to John H. Rowe for guidance and criticism in the preparation of this paper. Appreciation is also expressed to Alex D. Krieger, A. L. Kroeber, T. D. McCown and Gordon R. Willey for many helpful suggestions.

References

Bennett, Wendell C. 1939. Archaeology of the North Coast of Peru. Anthropological Papers, American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 37, Part 1, pp. 1–153. New York.Google Scholar
Bennett, Wendell C. 1950. The Gallinazo Group, Viru Valley, Peru. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 43. New Haven.Google Scholar
Bennett, Wendell C. and B. Bird, Junius 1949. Andean Culture History. American Museum of Natural History, Handbook Series, No. 15. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Junius B. 1948. Preceramic Cultures in Chicama and Viru. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 4, pp. 21–8. Menasha.Google Scholar
Carrion Cachot, Rebeca 1948. La Cultura Chavin; Dos Nuevas Colonias: Kuntur Wasi y Ancon. Revista del Museo Nacional de Antropologia y Arqueologia, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 99–172. Lima.Google Scholar
Evans, Clifford Jr., 1951. Review: Ford and Willey: “Surface survey of the Viru Valley, Peru.” American Antiquity, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 270–72. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Ford, James A. 1949. Cultural Dating of Prehistoric Sites in Viru Valley, Peru. Anthropological Papers, American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 43, Pt. 1, pp. 29–89. New York.Google Scholar
Ford, James A. and R. Willey, Gordon 1949. Viru Valley: Background and Problems. Anthropological Papers, American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 43, Pt. 1, pp. 11–28. New York.Google Scholar
Kroeder, A. L. 1944. Peruvian Archaeology in 1942. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, No. 4. New York.Google Scholar
Larco Hoyle, Rafael 1941. Los Cupisniques. Lima.Google Scholar
Larco Hoyle, Rafael 1944. Cultura Salinar. Sintesis Monografica. Sociedad Geografica Americana. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Larco Hoyle, Rafael 1945a. La Cultura Salinar. Revista Geografica Americana, Vol. 23, No. 141, pp. 327–36. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Larco Hoyle, Rafael 1945b. La Cultura Viru. Sociedad Geografica Americana. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Larco Hoyle, Rafael 1946a. La Cultura Viru. Revista Geografica Americana, Vol. 25, No. 151, pp. 209–22. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Larco Hoyle, Rafael 1946b. A Culture Sequence for the North Coast of Peru. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 143, Vol. 2, pp. 149–75. Washington.Google Scholar
Larco Hoyle, Rafael 1948. Cronologia Arqueologica del .Norte del Peru. Hacienda Chiclin, Trujillo.Google Scholar
Rowe, John H. 1950. Review: Bennett and Bird: “Andean Culture History.” American Antiquity, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 170–72. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Rowe, John H. Ms. “Subdivisions of the Early Chimu pottery style.” Read before the 49th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Berkeley, Dec. 28, 1950.Google Scholar
Strong, William D. 1925. The Uhle Pottery Collections from Ancon. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 135–90. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Strong, William D. 1947. Finding the Tomb of a Warrior-God. National Geographic Magazine, Vol. 91, No. 4, pp. 453–82. Washington.Google Scholar
Strong, William D. 1948. Cultural Epochs and Refuse Stratigraphy in Peruvian Archaeology. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 4, pp. 93–102. Menasha.Google Scholar
Strong, William D. and M. Corbett, John 1943. A Ceramic Sequence at Pachacamac. Columbia Studies in Archeology and Ethnology, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 27–122. New York.Google Scholar
Strong, William D. and R. Willey, Gordon 1943. Archaeological Notes on the Central Coast. Columbia Studies in Archeology and Ethnology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1–26. New York.Google Scholar
N., Wasserman, B. J., San Blas 1938. Ceramicas del Antiguo Peru; de la Coleccion Wassermann-San Bias. [The author]. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. 1943. Excavations in the Chancay Valley. Columbia Studies in Archeology and Ethnology, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 123–96. New York.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. 1951. Review: Jijon y Caamano: “Maranga.” American Anthropologist, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 112–4. Menasha.Google Scholar