Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:40:25.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of a Falling-Weight Tester for Assessing Ceramic Impact Strength

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jonathan Mabry
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Traditional Technology, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
James M. Skibo
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Traditional Technology, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Michael B. Schiffer
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Traditional Technology, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721
Kenneth Kvamme
Affiliation:
Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721

Abstract

A falling-weight device was developed for testing ceramic impact strength. Tests carried out on a large sample of commercial tiles showed that the incremental height test, wherein drop height is raised gradually, is the most reliable. In order to assess the accuracy of the test, an additional experiment was performed on laboratory-made briquettes fired at 550, 650, 750, 850, and 950 °C. In contrast to the results of Bronitsky and Hamer's (1986) pendulum test (but in conformity with general principles of ceramic engineering), the present study found a strong correlation between firing temperature and impact strength. It is concluded that the falling-weight device provides a simple, accurate, and reliable test for ceramic impact strength.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References cited

Braun, D. P. 1983 Pots as tools. In Archaeological Hammers and Theories, edited by Moore, J. A. and Keene, A. S., pp. 107-134. Academic Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronitsky, G. 1986 The Use of Materials Science Techniques in the Study of Pottery Construction and Use. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 9, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 209276. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
Bronitsky, G., and Hamer, R. 1986 Experiments in Ceramic Technology : The Effects of Various Tempering Materials on Impact and Thermal Shock Resistance. American Antiquity 51 : 89101.Google Scholar
Green, D. J. 1984 Impact Behavior of Coated Low-Density Bodies. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 67 : 560564.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, R. W. 1971 The Chemistry and Physics of Clays and Allied Ceramic Materials. 4th ed. Ernest Benn, London.Google Scholar
Larson, R. J., and Marx, M. L. 1981 An Introduction to Mathematical Statistics and Its Applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Skibo, J. M., and Schiffer, M. B. 1987 The Effects of Water on Processes of Ceramic Abrasion. Journal of Archaeological Science 14 : 8396.Google Scholar
Speth, J. D. 1974 Experimental Investigations of Hard-Hammer Percussion Flaking. Tebiwa 17 : 736.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D., and Torrie, J. M. 1980 Principles and Procedures of Statistics : A Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Tsai, Y. M. 1969 Stress Distribution and Fracture Produced by a Spherical Indenter on a Glass Plate Resting on a Ring Foundation. Developments in Mechanics 5 : 795809.Google Scholar
Tsai, Y. M., and Chen, Y. T. 1983 Transition of Hertzian Fracture to Flexible Fracture in Glass Plates by Impact. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 18 : 11851190.Google Scholar
Vaz Pinto, I., Schiffer, M. B., Smith, S., and Skibo, J. M. 1987 Effects of Temper on Ceramic Abrasion Resistance : A Preliminary Investigation. Archaeomaterials 1 : 119-134. Google Scholar