Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T20:30:40.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding Cache Variability: A Deliberately Burned Early Paleoindian Tool Assemblage from the Crowfield Site, Southwestern Ontario, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

D. Brian Deller
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2
Christopher J. Ellis
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2
James R. Keron
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2

Abstract

The Crowfield site, excavated in 1981–82, would be a small typical Early Paleoindian campsite except for the added presence of a plough-truncated pit feature containing 182+ burned and destroyed stone artifacts. This paper reports on the latest insights into the feature contents based on continuing attempts to cross-mend fragments, as well as detailed analyses of the spatial distribution of artifact pieces within the feature itself. These results reinforce earlier conclusions that the items were burned where found, represent a cache of still functional tools and preforms, and were purposefully destroyed. They confirm that the site represents the best evidence to date for sacred ritual by eastern North American fluted point users. Contrasts with other reported early sacred and secular caches are documented that highlight the uniqueness of the assemblage. It is argued that these contrasts indicate the Crowfield feature assemblage more closely approximates a transported, functioning tool kit, as opposed to the surplus, seasonal and insurance gear, or offerings, that dominate other early caches.

Résumé

Résumé

El sitio de Crowfield, excavado en los años 1981–82, sería un pequeño y típico campamento de la etapa Paleoindio Temprano, si no fuera por la presencia de un pozo truncado por el arado con más de 182 artefactos líticos quemados y destruidos. En este artículo presentamos lo que hemos aprendido de los contenidos del pozo hasta la fecha, gracias a continuos intentos de juntar fragmentos, así como a análisis detallados de la distribución espacial de las piezas de artefactos dentro del pozo. Estos análisis apoyan nuestra conclusión previa de que los implementos fueron quemados donde se encontraron, representan un escondite de implementos y preformas aún útiles, que fueron destruidos intencionalmente. Esto confirma que el sitio representa la única evidencia definitiva de ritos sagrados entre la gente que usaba las puntas acanaladas en la parte este de América del Norte. Contrastes con otros escondites tempranos, sagrados y seculares, subrayan la naturaleza única de este conjunto. Sostenemos que estos contrastes indican que el conjunto del pozo de Crowfield se asemeja más a un equipo transportado y funcional que a las ofrendas o las materias sobrantes, estacionales o escondidas para seguridad que eran dominantes en otros escondites.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Amick, Daniel 2004 A Possible Ritual Cache of Great Basin Stemmed Bifaces from the Terminal Pleistocene-Early Holocene Occupation of NW Nevada, USA. Lithic Technology 29(2): 119145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benmouyal, Jose 1987 Des Paléoindiens aux Iroquoiens en Gaspésie: Six Mille Ans D’Histoire. Dossiers No. 63, Ministère des Affaires Culturelles, Québec.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1962 Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity 28:217225.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1979 Organization and Formation Processes: Looking at Curated Technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 35:255273.Google Scholar
Buckmaster, Marla, and Paquette, James 1988 The Gorto Site: Preliminary Report on a Late Paleo-Indian Site in Marquette County, Michigan. Wisconsin Archaeologist 69(3): 101124.Google Scholar
Butler, Robert B. 1963 An Early Man Site at Big Camas Prairie, South-Central Idaho. Tebiwa 6(1):2233.Google Scholar
Coe, Joffre 1964 The Formative Cultures of the Carolina Piedmont. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 96(4). Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Collins, Michael B. 1999 Clovis Blade Technology. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Deller, D. Brian 1979 Paleo-Indian Reconnaissance in the Counties of Lambton and Middlesex. Ontario Archaeology 32:320.Google Scholar
Deller, D. Brian 1988 The Paleo-Indian Occupation of Southwestern Ontario: Distribution, Technology and Social Organization. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
Deller, D. Brian, and Ellis, Christopher J. 1984 Crowfield: A Preliminary Report on a Probable Paleo-Indian Cremation in Southwestern Ontario. Archaeology of Eastern North America 12:4171.Google Scholar
Deller, D. Brian, and Ellis, Christopher J. 1988 Early Palaeo-Indian Complexes in Southwestern Ontario. In Late Pleistocene and Early Holocene Paleoecology and Archaeology of the Eastern Great Lakes Region, edited by Richard Laub, Norton Miller and David Steadman, pp. 251263. Bulletin of the Buffalo Society of Natural Sciences 33.Google Scholar
Deller, D. Brian, and Ellis, Christopher J. 1992 Thedford II: A Paleoindian Site in the Ausable River Watershed of Southwestern Ontario. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan No. 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deller, D. Brian, and Ellis, Christopher J. 1996 The Bolton (AfHj–89) Site: An Early Paleo-Indian Crowfield Phase Site in Southwestern Ontario. Ontario Archaeology 60:54.Google Scholar
Deller, D. Brian, and Ellis, Christopher J. 2001 Evidence for Late Paleo-Indian Ritual from the Caradoc Site (AfHj-104), Southwestern Ontario, Canada. American Antiquity 66:267284.Google Scholar
Dincauze, Dena F. 1976 The Neville Site: 8,000 Years at Amoskeag. Monograph 4. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher J. 1984 Paleo-Indian Lithic Technological Structure and Organization in the Lower Great Lakes Area: A First Approximation. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher J. 1989 The Explanation of Northeastern Paleoindian Lithic Procurement Patterns. In Eastern Paleoindian Lithic Resource Use, edited by Christopher Ellis and Jonathan Lothrop, pp. 139164. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher J. 1997 Factors Influencing the Use of Stone Projectile Tips: An Ethnographic Perspective. In Projectile Technology, edited by Heidi Knecht, pp. 3774. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher J. 2009 The Crowfield and Caradoc Sites, Ontario: Glimpses of Paleoindian Sacred Ritual and World View. In Memorial Volume in Honour of James V. Wright, edited by David Keenleyside and Jean-Luc Pilon. Canadian Museum of Civilization, Archaeological Survey of Canada, Mercury Series Paper. Hull, Québec, in press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher J., and Brian Deller, D. 1988 Some Distinctive Paleo-Indian Tool Types from the Lower Great Lakes Region. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 13:111158.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher J., and Brian Deller, D. 1990 Paleo-Indians. In The Archaeology of Southern Ontario to A.D. 1650, edited by Christopher Ellis and Neal Ferris, pp. 3763. Occasional Publications, London Chapter, Ontario Archaeological Society, No. 5. London, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher J., and Brian Deller, D. 1997 Variability in the Archaeological Record of Northeastern Early Paleo-Indians: A View from Southern Ontario. Archaeology of Eastern North America 25:130.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher J., and Brian Deller, D. 2000 An Early Paleo-Indian Site Near Parkhill, Ontario. Canadian Museum of Civilization, Archaeological Survey of Canada, Mercury Series Paper No. 159. Hull, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher J., and Brian Deller, D. 2002 Excavations at the Caradoc Site (AfHj-104): A Late Paleoindian Ritual Artifact Deposit. Occasional Publications of the London Chapter, Ontario Archaeological Society, No. 8. London, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Frison, George C. 1991 The Clovis Cultural Complex: New Data from Caches of Flaked Stone and Worked Bone Artifacts. In Raw Material Economies among Prehistoric Hunter-Gatherers, edited by Anta Montet-White and Steven Holen, pp. 321333. University of Kansas, Publications in Anthropology 19.Google Scholar
Frison, George C., and Bradley, Bruce A. 1980 Folsom Tools and Technology at the Hanson Site, Wyoming. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Frison, George C., and Bradley, Bruce A. 1999 The Fenn Cache: Clovis Weapons and Tools. One Horse Land and Cattle Company, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Funk, Robert E. 1988 The Laurentian Concept: A Review. Archaeology of Eastern North America 16:142.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Jason 2007 Enculturing an Unknown World: Caches and Clovis Landscape Ideology. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 31:171189.Google Scholar
Gramly, R. Michael 1993 The Richey Clovis Cache: Earliest Americans Along the Columbia River. Persimmon Press Monographs in Archaeology, Buffalo, New York.Google Scholar
Gramly, R. Michael 1999 The Lamb Site: A Pioneering Clovis Encampment. Persimmon Press Monographs in Archaeology, Buffalo, New York.Google Scholar
Green, F. E. 1963 The Clovis Blades: An Important Addition to the Llano Complex. American Antiquity 29:145165.Google Scholar
Hartwell, William T. 1991 Ryan’s Site: A Plow-Disturbed Plainview Cache on the Southern High Plains of Texas. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.Google Scholar
Hofman, Jack L. 1992 Recognition and Interpretation of Folsom Technological Variability on the Southern Plains. In Ice Age Hunters of the Rockies, edited by Dennis J. Stanford and Jane S. Day, pp. 193224. University Press of Colorado, Denver.Google Scholar
Holen, Steven R., and Muniz, Mark P. 2005 A Flattop Chalcedony Biface Cache from Northeast Colorado. Current Research in the Pleistocene 22:4950.Google Scholar
Jackson, Lawrence J. 1998 The Sandy Ridge and Halstead Paleo-Indian Sites: Unifacial Tool Use and Gainey Phase Definition in South Central Ontario. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan No. 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jodry, Margaret A. 1992 Fitting Together Folsom: Refitted Lithics and Site Formation Processes at Stewart’s Cattle Guard Site. In Piecing Together the Past: Applications of Refitting Studies in Archaeology, edited by Jack L. Hofman and James G. Enloe, pp. 179209. BAR International Series 578. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kelly, Robert L. 1996 Ethnographic Analogy and Migration to the Western Hemisphere. In Prehistoric Dispersals of Mongoloid Peoples, edited by Takeru Akazawa and Emoke J. E. Szathmary, pp. 228240. Oxford University Press, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Kornfeld, Marcel, Akoshima, Kaoru, and Frison, George C. 1990 Stone Tool Caching on the North American Plains: Implications of the McKean Site Tool Kit. Journal of Field Archaeology 17:301309.Google Scholar
Kornfeld, Marcel, Larson, Mary Lou, Rapson, David J., and Frison, George C. 2001 10,000 years in the Rocky Mountains: The Helen Lookingbill Site. Journal of Field Archaeology 28:307324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Stephen 1994 A Formal Approach to the Design and Assembly of Mobile Tool Kits. American Antiquity 59:426442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahren, Larry, and Bonnichsen, Robson 1974 Bone Foreshafts from a Clovis Burial in Southwestern Montana. Science 186:147150.Google Scholar
Luedtke, Barbara 1979 Quarrying and Quantification: Estimates of Lithic Material Demand. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 4:255266.Google Scholar
MacDonald, George F. 1968 Debert: A Palaeo-Indian Indian Site in Central Nova Scotia. National Museums of Canada, Anthropology Papers No. 16. Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Mason, Ronald J. 1981 Great Lakes Archaeology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Mason, Ronald J., and Irwin, Carole 1960 An Eden-Scottsbluff Burial in Northeastern Wisconsin. American Antiquity 26:4357.Google Scholar
Meinholz, Norman M., and Kuehn, Steven R. 1996 The Deadman Slough Site. State Historical Society of Wisconsin, Archaeology Research Series No. 4.Google Scholar
Morrow, Juliet E., and Fiedel, Stuart J. 2006 New Radiocarbon Dates for the Clovis Component of the Anzick Site, Park County, Montana. In Paleoindian Archaeology: A Hemispheric Perspective, edited by Juliet E. Morrow and Cristóbal Gnecco, pp. 99137. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Morrow, Julie E., and Morrow, Toby A. 2002 Rummells-Maske Revisited: A Fluted Point Cache from East Central Iowa. Plains Anthropologist 47:307321.Google Scholar
Morse, Dan F. 1971 The Hawkins Cache: A Significant Dalton find in Northeast Arkansas. Arkansas Archaeologist 12(1):920.Google Scholar
Morse, Dan F. 1997 Sloan: A Paleoindian Dalton Cemetery in Arkansas. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
Odess, Daniel, and Rasic, Jeffrey 2007 Toolkit Composition and Assemblage Variability: The Implications of Nogahabara I, Northern Alaska. American Antiquity 72:691717.Google Scholar
Purdy, Barbara 1975 Fractures for the Archaeologist. In Lithic Technology: Making and Using Stone Tools, edited by Earl Swanson, pp. 133141. Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
Ritchie, William A. 1953 A Probable Paleo-Indian Site in Vermont. American Antiquity 18:249258.Google Scholar
Ritzenthaler, Robert 1972 The Pope Site: A Scottsbluff Cremation? Wisconsin Archaeologist 53(1):1519.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1987 Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Simons, Donald B., Shott, Michael, and Wright, Henry T. 1984 The Gainey Site: Variability in a Great Lakes Paleoindian Assemblage. Archaeology of Eastern North America 12:266279.Google Scholar
Storck, Peter L. 1997 The Fisher Site: Archaeological, Geological and Pale-obotanical Studies at an Early Paleoindian Site in Southern Ontario, Canada. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan No. 24.Google Scholar
Storck, Peter L., and Tomenchuk, John H. 1990 An Early Paleo-Indian Cache of Informal Tools at the Udora Site, Ontario. In Early Paleo-Indian Economies of Eastern North America, edited by Kenneth Tankersley and Barry Isaac, pp. 4593. Research in Economic Anthropology, Supplement 5.Google Scholar
Storck, Peter L., and Bitter, Peter von 1989 The Geological Age and Occurrence of Fossil Hill Formation Chert: Implications for Early Paleoindian Settlement Patterns in Southern Ontario and North America. In Eastern Paleoindian Lithic Resource Use, edited by Christopher J. Ellis and Jonathan Lothrop, pp. 165189. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Surovell, Todd, and Waguespack, Nicole 2007 Folsom Hearth-Centered Use of Space at Barger Gulch, Locality B. In Emerging Frontiers in Colorado Paleoindian Archaeology, edited by Robert S. Brunswig and Bonnie Pitblado, pp. 219259. University of Colorado Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
Timmins, Peter 1994 Alder Creek: A Paleo-Indian Crowfield Phase Manifestation in the Region of Waterloo, Ontario. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 19:170197.Google Scholar
Walthall, John A., and Holley, George R. 1997 Mobility and Hunter-Gatherer Toolkit Design: Analysis of a Dalton Lithic Cache. Southeastern Archaeology 16:152162.Google Scholar
Walthall, John A., and Koldehoff, Brad 1998 Hunter-Gatherer Interaction and Alliance Formation: Dalton and the Cult of the Long Blade. Plains Anthropologist 43:257273.Google Scholar
Wright, Henry T., and Roosa, William B. 1966 The Barnes Site: A Fluted Point Assemblage from the Great Lakes Region. American Antiquity 31:850860.Google Scholar
Wright, James V. 1995 A History of the Native People of Canada, Volume 1: 10,000–1,000 B.C. Canadian Museum of Civilization, Archaeological Survey of Canada, Mercury Series Paper 152. Hull, Québec.Google Scholar