Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:02:05.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sourcing Busycon Artifacts of the Eastern United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Cheryl Claassen  and
Samuella Sigmann
Cheryl Claassen
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608
Samuella Sigmann
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A review of the history of marine-shell chemical-sourcing efforts preceeds the introduction of this project. Atomic-absorption spectroscopy (AAS) was used to assay levels of Ca, Mg, Fe, and Sr, in 44 prehistoric Busycon carica and Busycon perversum specimens from the eastern United States. Control shells (35) were collected from food refuse in coastal archaeological sites from Long Island to the Mexico—United States border. Subject shells came from nine Archaic and Mississippian sites. Elemental ratios were clustered to derive a probable water-body origin for the nine artifacts. The influence of diagenesis, body part, and species was negligible, but geography heavily influenced the results. The three shells from Monks Mound indicated origin in tropical, eastern Gulf, and Atlantic water. The shells from the Indian Knoll, Mulberry, and Tatham sites appear to have originated in eastern Gulf waters. The shell from the Archaic-period Ward site seems to have come from tropical water.

Resumen

Resumen

Este artículo introduce un proyecto que utiliza AAS para determinar los niveles de Ca, Mg, Fe, y Sr en 44 especímenes prehistóricos de las conchas Busycon carica y Busycon perversum de la región este de los Estados Unidos. Las conchas (35) para los experimentos de control fueron recogidas en sitios en la costa desde Long Island hasta la frontera entre México y los Estados Unidos. Artefactos de concha (9) fueron recogidos en sitios Indian Knoll, Ward, Tatham, Mulberry, y Cahokia, de los períodos Arcaico y Misisipiano. Las proporciones de los elementos fueron analizadas para determinar el origen acuático de las conchas. La influencia de difusión, parte de la concha, especie, fue floja pew de geografía fue fuerte en un análisis "cluster" (BMDP 2m). La caracterización química de las conchas parece ser una herramienta muy fuerte para determinar su origen acuático

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , April 1993 , pp. 333 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ceci, L. 1986 Shell Bead Exchange Patterns in New York. Paper presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Chave, K. E. 1954 Aspects of the Biogeochemistry of Magnesium (1) Calcareous Marine Organisms. Journal of Geology 62 : 266–283.Google Scholar
Claassen, C. 1985 Steps Toward Sourcing Shell. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Birmingham.Google Scholar
Claassen, C. 1987 Sourcing Marine Shell. Paper presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Toronto.Google Scholar
Claassen, C. 1988 Sourcing Marine Shell Artifacts. In Proceedings of the 1986 Shell Bead Conference, Selected Papers, edited by Hayes, C. and Ceci, L., pp. 17–21. Research Records No. 20. Rochester Museum and Science Center, Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
Clarke, F. W. 1924 The Composition of the River and Lake Waters of the United States. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper No. 135. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Coughlin, E., and Claassen, C. 1982 Establishing Environmental Baselines from Archeological Materials. Paper presented at the 184th Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Kansas City.Google Scholar
Doran, G. 1984 PIXE Analysis of Gulf Islands Ceramics. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Pensacola, Florida.Google Scholar
Fassel, V. A. 1978 Comments of Chairperson International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. Spectrochimica Acta 33B : 247–269.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. 1968 The Olmec and the Valley of Oaxaca : A Model for Inter-regional Interaction in Formative Times. In Dumbarton Oaks Conference on the Olmec, edited by Benson, E. P., pp. 79–110. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Goad, S. 1979 Middle Woodland Exchange in the Prehistoric Southeastern United States. In Hopewell Archaeology, edited by Brose, D. and Greber, N., pp. 239–246. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Hill, F. C. 1975 Effects of the Environment on Animal Exploitation by Archaic Inhabitants of the Koster Site, Illinois. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Biology, University of Louisville, Louisville.Google Scholar
Hofman, J. 1985 Middle Archaic Ritual and Shell Midden Archaeology : Considering the Significance of Cremations. In Exploring Tennessee Prehistory, edited by Whyte, T., Boyd, C, and Riggs, B., pp. 1–22. Report of Investigations No. 42. Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Miller, K. 1980 Chemical Characterization of Archeological Shell. Unpublished Senior honors thesis, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ottesen, A. 1979 Acquisition of Exotic Raw Materials by Late Woodland and Mississippian Peoples. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, New York University, New York.Google Scholar
Perkin-Elmer, 1976 Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry. Publication No. 303-0152. Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk.Google Scholar
Price, W. J. 1979 Spectrochemical Analysis by Atomic Absorption. Heyden, London.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, G. D. 1990 The “Vital Effect” on Skeletal Trace Element Content as Exemplified by Magnesium. Ms. on file, Department of Geology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Shackleton, N., and Renfrew, C. 1970 Neolithic Trade Routes Re-aligned by Oxygen Isotope Analyses. Nature 228 : 1062–1065.Google Scholar
Sigmann, S. 1988 Development of a Method for the Determination of Selected Metals in Marine Shell Samples By Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Chemistry, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Spencer, C. 1982 The Cuicatlan Canada and Monte Albdn : A Study of Primary State Formation. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Swann, C. P., Carriker, M., and Ewart, J. 1984 Significance of Environment and Chronology on Distribution of 16 Elements (Na to Sr) in the Shells of Living Oysters. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B3 1984 : 392–395.Google Scholar
Swift, D. J. P., and Stanley, D. J. 1976 Marine Sediment Transport and Environmental Management. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Turekian, K., and Armstrong, R. 1960 Magnesium, Strontium and Barium Concentrations and Calcite-Aragonite Ratios of Some Recent Molluscan Shells. Journal of Marine Research 18 : 133–151.Google Scholar
Walthall, J., Stow, S., and Karson, M. 1979 Ohio Hopewell Trade : Galena Procurement and Exchange. In Hopewell Archaeology, edited by Brose, D. and Greber, N., pp. 247–250. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Whitmer, A., Ramenofsky, A., Thomas, J., Thibodeaux, L., Field, S., and Miller, B. 1989 Stability or Instability : The Role of Diffusion in Trace Element Studies. Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 1, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 205–273. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Willard, H. H., Merritt, L. L., Dean, J. A., and Settle, F. A. 1981 Instrumental Methods of Analysis. 6th ed. Van Nostrand, New York.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, R. 1978 Long-Distance Exchange and the Growth of a Regional Center on the Southern Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico. In Prehistoric Coastal Adaptations, edited by Stark, B. and Voorhies, B., pp. 183–210. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar