Article contents
So-Called Jaguar-Human Copulation Scenes in Olmec Art
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 January 2017
Abstract
Three Olmec sculptures are frequently thought to represent copulation between human beings and jaguars, an important element in what we are able to reconstruct of Olmec belief, but evidence and parallels discussed here suggest that this interpretation of the sculptures is incorrect. Alternate explanations which are consistent with a new view would assign an aggressive, ritual, or allegorical meaning to these sculptures and to certain other related Olmec representations.
- Type
- Reports
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1978
References
References Cited
Bernal, Ignacio
1973
Stone reliefs in the Dainzu area. In The iconography of middle American sculpture, by Bernal, Ignacio
et al., pp. 13–23. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.Google Scholar
Clewlow, Carl William
1974
A stylistic and chronological study of Olmec monumental sculpture. University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Contributions 19.
University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Clewlow, Carl William, and Corson, C. R.
1968
New stone monuments from La Venta, 1968. University of California Archaeological ResearchFacility, Contributions
5:171–182.Google Scholar
Coe, Michael
1965a The Olmec style and its distribution. In Handbook of American Indians, edited by Willey, GordonR.,pp. 739–775. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Coe, Michael
1965b The jaguar's children: preclassic central Mexico.
Museum of Primitive Art, New York.Google Scholar
Coe, Michael
1972
Olmec jaguars and Olmec kings. In The cult of the feline, edited by Benson, ElizabethP., pp. 1–12. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar
Coe, Michael
1973
The iconology of Olmec art. In The iconography of middle American sculpture, by Bernal, Ignacio
et al., pp. 1–12. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.Google Scholar
Cook de Leonard, Carmen
1967
Sculptures and rock-carvings at Chalcatzingo, Morelos. University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Contributions
3:57–84.Google Scholar
Covarrubias, Miguel
1946
Mexico south: the isthmus of Tehuantepec.
Alfred A. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Covarrubias, Miguel
1957
Indian art of Mexico and Central America.
Alfred A. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Davis, Whitney M.
1976
The origin of register composition in predynastic Egyptian art. American Oriental Society, Journal
96:404–418.Google Scholar
Drucker, Philip P.
1952 A study of Olmec ceramics and art. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 153. Smithsonian Institution,Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Drucker, Philip P., Heizer, R.F., and Squier, R.J.
1959 Excavations at La Venta, Tabasco, 1955. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 170. SmithsonianInstitution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Fuente, Beatriz de la
1973
Escultura monumental Olmeca: Catalogo.
Institute de Investigaciones Estéticas, Mexico.Google Scholar
Grove, David C.
1968a Chalcatzingo, Morelos: a reappraisal of the Olmec rock carvings. American Antiquity
33:486–91.Google Scholar
Grove, David C.
1968b The preclassic Olmec in central Mexico: site distribution and inferences. In Dumbarton Oaks conferenceon the Olmec, edited by Benson, ElizabethP., pp. 179–185. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar
Grove, David C.
1970
The Olmec paintings of Oxtotitlan Cave, Guerrero, Mexico. Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology6. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar
Heizer, Robert F.
1962
The possible sociopolitical structure of the La Venta Olmec. In Akten des 34. Internationalen Amerikanistenkongresses, pp. 310–317. Verlag Ferdinand Berger, Vienna.Google Scholar
Heizer, Robert F.
1968
New observations on La Venta. In Dumbarton Oaks conference on the Olmec, edited by Benson, Elizabeth P., pp. 9–40. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar
Heizer, Robert F., and Drucker, P.
1968
The fluted pyramid of the La Venta site. Antiquity
42:52–56.Google Scholar
Heizer, Robert F., and Williams, H.
1965
Sources of rocks used in Olmec monuments. In Sources of stones used in prehistoric Mesoamericansites, edited by Heizer, RobertF., pp. 1–38. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Joralemon, Peter David
1971
A study of Olmec iconography. Studies in Pre-Columbian Art and Archaeology 7.
Dumbarton OaksResearch Library and Collection, Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar
Joralemon, Peter David
1976 The Olmec dragon: a study in pre-Columbian iconography. In Origins of religious art and iconographyin Preclassic Mesoamerica, edited by Nicholson, H.B., pp. 27–71. UCLA Latin American Centerand the Ethnic Arts Council of Los Angeles, Los Angeles. UCLA Latin American Studies 31.Google Scholar
Medellin Zenil, Alfonso
1960
Monolitos ineditos Olmecas. La Palabra y el Hombre
16:75–97.Google Scholar
Metcalf, George, and Flannery, K. V.
1967
An Olmec “were-jaguar” from the Yucatan Peninsula. American Antiquity
32:109–111.Google Scholar
Stirling, Matthew W.
1943
Stone monuments of southern Mexico. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 138. SmithsonianInstitution, Washington, D.C.
Google Scholar
Stirling, Matthew W.
1955
Stone monuments of Rio Chiquito, Veracruz, Mexico. Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin
157:1–23.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.
S., Eric
1931
Aquatic symbols common to various centers of the classic period in Mesoamerica. In The Civilizations of ancient Mexico: selected papers of the 29th International Congress of Americanists, edited by Tax, Sol, pp. 31–36. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by