Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:06:56.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Reexamination of the Cotton Remains from Huaca Prieta, North Coastal Peru

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Abstract

An analysis of cotton remains from Huaca Prieta on the north Peruvian coast, dating from circa 2500 B.C. to circa 750 B.C., indicates that they were probably primitive forms of G. barbadense L. and similar in most features to those previously examined from sites in the Ancon area of the central coast (Stephens and Moseley 1974). As in the Ancon materials, there is a tendency for seed size, boll size and fiber width to increase from the earlier to later levels. Most of the Ancon materials belonged to the Preceramic Period, while at Huaca Prieta both Preceramic and Initial Periods are represented. Only fuzzy seeds were found among the Ancon materials and among the Preceramic materials recovered from Huaca Prieta. Tufted seeds first appear during the Initial Period at Huaca Prieta; it is the prevailing type among present-day cultivars, and may have been favored under human selection because their fibers are much more readily removed from the seeds by hand. It is believed that fuzzy seeds represent the more primitive condition; it is the prevailing type among present-day wild forms of G. barbadense. It remains a question whether the tufted seeds at Huaca Prieta originated as mutants in the locally cultivated fuzzy seeded types, or whether they were new forms, introduced along with pottery and other crop plants from elsewhere. None of the cotton materials so far examined from Peruvian coastal sites show affinities with cottons still extant in the Amazon Basin, and no wild, or apparently wild, forms of G. barbadense have yet been found east of the Andes.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bird, Junius B. 1948 America's oldest farmers. Natural History 57:296303.Google Scholar
Bird, Junius B. 1951 South American radiocarbon dates. In Radiocarbon dating: a report on the program to aid in the development” of the method of dating. Society for American Archaeology, Memoir 8:3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, F. 1963 A preceramic settlement on the central coast of Peru: Asia, Unit 1. American Philosophical Society, Transactions 53:1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayton, A. H. 1967 Textiles from Hacha, Peru. Ñawpa Pacha 5:114.Google Scholar
Lanning, E. P. 1967 Peru before the Incas. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Lathrap, D. W. 1970 The Upper Amazon. Thames and Hudson, New York.Google Scholar
Patterson, T. C, and Edward Moseley, M. 1968 Late pre-ceramic and early ceramic cultures of the central coast of Peru. Ñawpa Pacha 6:115133.Google Scholar
Pickersgill, B. 1969 The archaeological record of chili peppers (Capsicum spp.) and the sequence of plant domestication in Peru. American Antiquity 34:5461.Google Scholar
Smith, C. Earle Jr., and MacNeish, R. S. 1964 Antiquity of American polyploid cottons. Science 143:675676.Google Scholar
Smith, C. Earle Jr., and Stephens, S. G. 1971 Critical identification of Mexican archaeological cotton remains. Economic Botany 25:160168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, S. G. 1973 Geographical distribution of cultivated cottons relative to probable centers of domestication in the New World. In Genes, Enzymes and Populations, edited by Srb, A. M.. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. G. 1974 The” use of two polymorphic systems, nectary fringe hairs and corky alleles, as indicators of phylogenetic relationships in New World cottons. Biotropica 6:194201.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. G., and Edward Moseley, M. 1974 Early domesticated cottons from archae-logical sites in central coastal Peru. American Antiquity 39:109122.Google Scholar
Whitaker, T. W., and Bird, J. B. 1949 Identification and significance of the cucurobit materials from Huaca Prieta, Peru. American Museum Novitates 1426:115.Google Scholar