Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:01:13.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reevaluation of the Identification of Ancient Maize Pollen from Alabama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mary Eubanks
Mary Eubanks*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, Box 90338, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fearn and Liu (1995) reported positive identification of a large Poaceae pollen grain recovered from a lake bed core in Alabama dating to 3500 B.P. as Zea mays. Reinterpretation of old data and new data reported here indicate this identification is questionable. Review of the evidence at hand indicates the most likely identification of the pollen grain in question is Tripsacum, although it could be primitive maize, teosinte, or Zea “indiana,” a hybrid between Tripsacum and teosinte. Until the sample size is expanded and a firm identification can be made, caution is urged in interpretations about the significance of this find for early maize agriculture in eastern North America.

Fearn y Liu (1995) reportaron la identificación positiva de un grano de polen de la familia Poaceae obtenido de los sedimentos del Lago Shelby en la costa de Alabama como Zea mays, datado a 3500 A.P. La informatión reportada aqui indica que esta identificatión es cuestionable. Una revision de la evidencia indica que la identificatión más probable de éste grano de polen es Tripsacum, aunque este podria ser el maíz primitive, teosinte о Zea “indiana,” un hibrido entre Tripsacum y teosinte. Hasta que el tamaño de la muestra se amplie y se haga una identification firme, se urge cautela en las interpretaciones con respecte al significado de este hallazgo para la agricultura del maíz en Norteamérica.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , January 1997 , pp. 139 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Andersen, S. T. 1960 Silicone Oil as a Mounting Medium for Pollen Grains. Danmark Geologiske Undersolgelse 4: 1–24.Google Scholar
Banerjee, U. C, and Barghoorn, E. S. 1970 Electron Microscopy of the Pollen Grains of Maize, Teosinte, and Tripsacum. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 44: 43–14.Google Scholar
Barghoorn, E. S., Wolfe, M. K., and Clisby, K. H. 1954 Fossil Maize from the Valley of Mexico. Botanical Museum Leaflets No. 16, pp. 229–240. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Bryant, V. ML, Jr., and Hall, S. A. 1993 Archaeological Palynology in the United States: A Critique. American Antiquity 58: 277–286.Google Scholar
Cushing, E. J. 1961 Size Increase in Pollen Grains Mounted in Thin Slides. Pollen et Spores 3: 265–274.Google Scholar
Cutler, H. C. 1946 Races of Maize in South America. Botanical Museum Leaflets No. 12, pp. 257–91. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Cutler, H. C. 1978 Suggestions for Evaluating Archaeological Maize. American Antiquity 43: 97–99.Google Scholar
Eubanks, M. 1995a A Cross between Two Maize Relatives: Tripsacum dactyloides and Zea diploperennis (Poaceae). Economic Botany 49: 172–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubanks, M. 1995b Morphological Differences in Pollen Grains of Zea diploperennis, Tripsacum dactyloides, Tripsacum diploperennis Hybrids and Maize. Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter 69: 55–56.Google Scholar
Faegri, K., and lversen, J. 1989 Textbook of Pollen Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Fearn, M. L., and Liu, K. 1995 Maize Pollen of 3500 B.P. from Southern Alabama. American Antiquity 60: 109–117.Google Scholar
Grant, C. A. 1972 A Scanning Electron Microscopy Survey of Some Maydeae Pollen. Grana 12: 177–184.Google Scholar
Irwin, H., and Barghoorn, E. S. 1965 Identification of the Pollen of Maize Teosinte, and Tripsacum by Phase Contrast Microscopy. Botanical Museum Leaflets No. 21, pp. 37–57. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Kurtz, E. B., Liverman, J. L., and Tucker, H. 1960 Some Problems Concerning Fossil and Modern Corn Pollen. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 87: 85–94.Google Scholar
Tsukada, M., and Rowley, J. R. 1964 Identification of Modern and Fossil Maize Pollen. Grana Palynologica 5: 406–412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, D. R., and Langham, E. J. 1965 Measurement as a Means of Identifying Fossil Maize Pollen. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 92: 7–20.Google Scholar