Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:23:35.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconsidering the Precolumbian Presence of Venetian Glass Beads in Alaska

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2021

Elliot H. Blair Open the ORCID record for Elliot H. Blair [Opens in a new window]
Elliot H. Blair*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Alabama, Box 870210, Tuscaloosa, AL35487, USA
*
([email protected], corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a recent article, Kunz and Mills (2021) report 10 drawn, a speo finished, turquoise blue, IIa40 beads manufactured in Venice and recovered from three late precontact sites in the Alaskan Arctic. They argue that these beads date to the fifteenth century, predating Columbus's arrival in the Americas. This conclusion is certainly in error because beads of this type were not manufactured prior to approximately AD 1560. The historical and archaeological evidence for this dating is substantial. Additionally, the elemental and radiocarbon evidence presented by Kunz and Mills (2021) supports a late sixteenth- to early seventeenth-century date for these beads.

En un artículo reciente, Kunz y Mills (2021) reportan 10 cuentas trazadas azules turquesa, de acabado a speo y tipo IIa40, fabricadas en Venecia y recuperados en tres sitios del pre-contacto tardío en el Ártico de Alaska. Argumentan que estas cuentas datan del siglo XV, previo a la llegada de Colón a las Américas. Esta conclusión es ciertamente errónea ya que las cuentas de este tipo no se fabricaron antes de aproximadamente el año 1560 d.C. La evidencia histórica y arqueológica de esta datación es sustancial. Además, la evidencia elemental y de radiocarbono presentada por Kunz y Mills (2021) respalda una fecha de finales del siglo XVI a principios del XVII para estas cuentas.

Keywords

AlaskaVeniceglass beadsradiocarbonchronologyinstrumental neutron activation analysisAlaskaVeneciacuentas de vidrioradiocarbonocronologíaanálisis poractivación neutrónica
Type
Comment
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 86 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 638 - 642
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for American Archaeology

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Anderson, Shelby L., and Feathers, James K. 2019 Applying Luminescence Dating of Ceramics to the Problem of Dating Arctic Archaeological Sites. Journal of Archaeological Science 112:105030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailo, Luigi 1903 Delle perle vitree ritrovate in terreni di Valdobbiadene, provincia di Treviso. Atti del Reale Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti 62(2):1021–1033.Google Scholar
Gasparetto, Astone 1958 Il vetro di Murano dalle origini ad oggi. Neri Pozza, Venice.Google Scholar
Gilbert-Young, Sabra Elizabeth 2004 The Archaeology of a Severely Vandalized Site, 49-MIS-032, at Lake Kaiyak, Noatak National Preserve, Northwest Alaska. Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ron G. V., Chafe, Anne, and Kenyon, Ian 1994 Neutron Activation Analysis of Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century European Blue Glass Trade Beads from the Eastern Great Lakes Area of North America. Archaeometry 36:253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, Ian, Hancock, Ronald G. V., and Aufreiter, Susan 1995 Neutron Activation Analysis of AD 1660–1930 European Copper-Coloured Blue Glass Trade Beads from Ontario, Canada. Archaeometry 37:323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunz, Michael 2005 The Denbigh Flint Complex at Punyik Point, Etivlik Lake, Alaska. Alaska Journal of Anthropology 3(2):101–115.Google Scholar
Kunz, Michael 2009 The Mesa, Lisburne, and Punyik Point Sites: Colville River Drainage, Northern Alaska: The Sequence of Ancient Cultures in the Brooks Range Foothills. In Archaeology in America: An Encyclopedia, edited by McManamon, Francis, pp. 321–326. Greenwood Press, Westport, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Kunz, Michael L., and Mills, Robin O. 2021 A Precolumbian Presence of Venetian Glass Trade Beads in Arctic Alaska. American Antiquity 86:395–412. DOI:10.1017/aaq.2020.100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledger, Paul M., and Forbes, Véronique 2020 Paleoenvironmental Analyses from Nunalleq, Alaska Illustrate a Novel Means to Date Pre-Inuit and Inuit Archaeology. Arctic Anthropology 56(2):39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moretti, Gianni 2005 The Chevron Bead: History and Technology of the World Best Known Venetian Bead. Revista della Stazione Sperimentale del Vetro 35(1):40–47.Google Scholar
Sarpellon, Giovanni 2010 Le perle veneziane: Un tesoro da scoprire. In Matematica e cultura 2010, edited by Emmer, Michele, pp. 291–302. Springer-Verlag, Milan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirar, Scott 2011 Late Holocene Chronology of the Noatak and Kobuk Rivers. Alaska Journal of Anthropology 9(2):1–16.Google Scholar
Smith, Marvin T. 1983 Chronology from Glass Beads: The Spanish Period in the Southeast, 1513–1670. In Proceedings of the 1982 Glass Trade Bead Conference, edited by Hayes, Charles F. III, pp. 147–158, Research Records 16. Rochester Museum and Science Center, Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, Marvin T., and Elizabeth Good, Mary 1982 Early Sixteenth Century Glass Beads in the Spanish Colonial Trade. Cottonlandia Museum Publications, Greenwood, Mississippi.Google Scholar
Walder, Heather 2018 Small Beads, Big Picture: Assessing Chronology, Exchange, and Population Movement through Compositional Analyses of Blue Glass Beads from the Upper Great Lakes. Historical Archaeology 52:301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zecchin, Paolo 2005 La nascita delle conterie veneziane. Journal of Glass Studies 47:77–92.Google Scholar