Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T10:53:09.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Reconsideration of Shellmounds with Respect to Population and Nutrition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

S. F. Cook*
Affiliation:
Division of Physiology, University of California, Berkeley, California

Extract

A good many years ago Nelson and Gifford made a careful and extensive survey of the shellmounds of San Francisco Bay, in the course of which they utilized quantitative methods of analysis to determine the probable age of the cultures represented. In the years since their publications, new deposits have come to light in various parts of the Americas to which their methods might be applied, and a great deal more knowledge is now available which is applicable to the field of primitive dietetics.

Type
Facts and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eckholm, G. E. 1944. Excavations at Tampico and Panuco in the Huasteca, Mexico. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 38, pp.321509.Google Scholar
Gifford, E. W. 1916. Composition of California Shellmounds. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 12, pp. 129.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. C. 1909. Shellmounds of the San Francisco Bay Region. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 7, pp. 309356.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. C. 1910. The Ellis Landing Shellmound. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 7, pp. 357426.Google Scholar
Rose, M. S. 1938. The Foundations of Nutrition. Third Edition. New York.Google Scholar