Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-20T18:05:25.779Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary Studies of the Trace Element Composition of Obsidian Artifacts from Northern Campeche, Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Fred W. Nelson ,
Kirk K. Nielson ,
Nolan F. Mangelson ,
Max W. Hill  and
Ray T. Matheny
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Obsidian artifacts from Edzna, Dzibilnocac, and Santa Rosa Xtampak in northern Campeche, Mexico, have been analyzed by means of X-ray fluorescence in order to determine their trace element composition. The results are compared to the trace element composition of obsidian sources in Guatemala and Mexico. It is postulated that the obsidian from the three sites in northern Campeche came from highland Guatemala, mostly from El Chayal. Our data are compared to the published data of other archaeological sites in Mesoamerica from which obsidian samples have been analyzed. Finally, obsidian transport routes are postulated between northern Campeche, Mexico, and highland Guatemala.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , April 1977 , pp. 209 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. E. W. 1974 Rio Bee archaeology and the rise of Maya civilization. Paper presented at the Origins of Maya Civilization Conference, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Ahlbert, M., Akselsson, R., Forkman, B., and Rausing, G. 1976 Gold traces on wedge-shaped artifacts from the Late Neolithic of southern Scandinavia analyzed by proton-induced X-ray emission spectroscopy. Archaeometry 18:39–49.Google Scholar
Andrews, E. Wyllys 1965 Archaeology and prehistory in the northern Maya Lowlands: an introduction. In Handbook of Middle American Indians, edited by Willey, Gordon R., Volume 2, pp. 288–330. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Bieber, A. M. Jr., Brooks, D. W., Harbottle, G., and Sayre, E.V. 1976 Application of multivariate techniques to analytical data on Aegean ceramics. Archaeometry 18:59–74.Google Scholar
Ahler, S. A. 1973a Composition variations in obsidian sources and the archaeological implications. Archaeometry 15:123–27.Google Scholar
Ahler, S. A. 1973b On the uniformity of composition in obsidians and evidence for magmatic mixing. Journal of Geology 81:312–27.Google Scholar
Brainerd, George W. 1958 The archaeological ceramics of Yucatan. University of California Anthropological Records 19, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Cobean, Robert H., Coe, Michael D., Perry, Edward A., Jr., Turekian, Karl K., and Kharkar, Dinkar P. 1971 Obsidian trade at San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, Mexico. Science 174:666–71.Google Scholar
DeBloois, Evan I. 1970 Archaeological researches in northern Campeche, Mexico. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Weber State College, Ogden, Utah.Google Scholar
Frison, George C., Wright, Gary A., Griffin, James B., and Gordus, Adon A. 1968 Neutron activation analysis of obsidian: an example of its relevance to Northwestern Plains archaeology. The Plains Anthropologist 13:209–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordus, A. A., Wright, G. A., and Griffin, J. B. 1968 Characterization of obsidian sources by neutron activation analysis. Science 161:382-84.Google Scholar
Graham, John A., Hester, Thomas R., and Jack, Robert N. 1972 Sources for the obsidian at the ruins of Seibal, Peten, Guatemala. University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Contributions 16:111–16.Google Scholar
Griffin, James B., Gordus, A. A., and Wright, G. A. 1969 Identification of the sources of Hopewellian obsidian in the Middle West. American Antiquity 34:1–14.Google Scholar
Hammond, Norman 1972 Obsidian trade routes in the Maya area. Science 178:1092–93.Google Scholar
Hauck, Forrest Richard 1973 The Edzna hydraulic complex, initial investigation, 1972. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
Heizer, Robert F., Williams, Howel, and Graham, John A. 1965 Notes on Mesoamerican obsidians and their significance in archaeological studies. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility 1:94–103.Google Scholar
Hester, T. R. 1975 X-ray fluorescence analysis of archaeological obsidian from the Rio Grande Plain, Southern Texas. The Texas Journal of Science 26:286–89.Google Scholar
Hester, Thomas R., Heizer, Robert F., and Jack, Robert N. 1971 Technology and geological sources of obsidian from Cerro de las Mesas, Veracruz, Mexico, with observations on Olmec trade. University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Contributions 13:65–132.Google Scholar
Hester, Thomas R., Jack, Robert N., and Benfer, Alice 1973 Trace element analysis of obsidian from Michoacan, Mexico: preliminary results. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Contributions 18:167–76.Google Scholar
Hester, Thomas R., Jack, Robert N., and Heizer, Robert F. 1971 The obsidian of Tres Zapotes. University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Contributions 13:65–132.Google Scholar
Hester, Thomas R., Jack, Robert N., and Heizer, Robert F. 1972 Trace element analysis of obsidian from the site of Cholula. University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Contributions 16:105–10.Google Scholar
Jack, R. N., and Carmichael, I. S. E. 1969 The chemical “fingerprinting” of acid volcanic rocks. California Journal of Mines Geology Short Contribution, California Geology S.R. 100:17–32.Google Scholar
Jack, R. N., and Heizer, R. F. 1968 “Finger-printing” of some Mesoamerican obsidian artifacts. University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Contributions 5:81–100.Google Scholar
Jack, Robert N., Hester, Thomas R., and Heizer, Robert F. 1972 Geologic sources of archaeological obsidian from sites in northern and central Veracruz, Mexico. University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Contributions 16:117–22.Google Scholar
Kowalski, B. R., Schatzki, T. F., and Stross, F. H. 1972 Classification of archaeological artifacts by applying pattern recognition to trace element data. Analytical Chemistry 44:2176–80.Google Scholar
Matheny, Ray T. 1973 The hydraulic system of Edzna, Campeche: Preliminary investigations. In Las Memorias de la XIII Mesa Redonda, Sociedad Mexicano de Antropologia, Mexico.Google Scholar
Matheny, Ray T., and Berge, Dale L. 1971 Investigations in Campeche, Mexico. Ceramica de Cultura Maya etal. 7:1–15.Google Scholar
Michels, Joseph W., and Bebrich, Carl A. 1971 Obsidian hydration dating. In Dating techniques for the archaeologist, edited by Michael, Henry N. and Ralph, Elizabeth K., pp. 164–221. The MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. E., D'Auria, J. M., and Bennett, R. B. 1975 Characterization of Pacific Northwest Coast obsidian by X-ray fluorescence analysis. Archaeometry 17:85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Fred W., Jr. 1973 Archaeological investigations at Dzibilnocac, Campeche, Mexico. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation, 33. Brigham Young University Press, Provo.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Kirk K. 1975 Development of proton-induced X-ray emission techniques with application to multielement analysis of human autopsy tissues and obsidian artifacts. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Department of Chemistry, Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
Nielson, K. K., Hill, M. W., Mangelson, N. F., and Nelson, F. W. 1976 Elemental analysis of obsidian artifacts using proton-induced X-ray emission. Analytical Chemistry 48:1947–50.Google Scholar
Rathje, William 1972 Praise the gods and pass the metates: a hypothesis of the development of lowland rainforest civilization in Mesoamerica. In Contemporary archaeology: a guide to theory and contributions, edited by Leone, Mark P., pp. 365–449. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and Edwardsville.Google Scholar
Roys, Ralph L. 1972 The Indian background of colonial Yucatan. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Sabloff, Jeremy A., and Rathje, William L. 1975 The rise of a Maya merchant class. Scientific American 233:72–82.Google Scholar
Sidrys, Raymond, Andresen, John, and Marcucci, Derek 1975 Obsidian sources in the Maya area. Journal of New World Archaeology 1(5): 1–13.Google Scholar
Stevenson, D. P., Stross, F. H., and Heizer, R. F. and Jack, Robert N. 1971 An evaluation of X-ray fluorescence analysis as a method for correlating obsidian artifacts with source location. Archaeometry 13:17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, D. P., Stross, F. H., and Heizer, R. F. and Jack, Robert N. n.d. Chemical and archaeological studies of Mesoamerican obsidian. In Recent advances in obsidian glass studies: archaeological and geochemical perspectives, edited by Taylor, R. E. (In press, ms. 1973).Google Scholar
Stross, F. H., Weaver, J. R., Wyld, G. E., Heizer, R. F., and Graham, J. A. 1968 Analysis of American obsidians by X-ray fluorescence and neutron activation. University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Contributions 5:59–80.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. Eric S. 1970 Maya history and religion. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Weaver, J. R., and Stross, F. H. 1965 Analysis by X-ray fluorescence of some American obsidians. University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Contributions 1:89–93.Google Scholar
Ward, G. K. 1974 Comparison of source and artifact characterization data using a generalized distance measure. American Antiquity 39:473–77.Google Scholar