Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:05:29.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Pot is Not a Rock: A Reply to Neff, Glascock, Bishop, and Blackman

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James H. Burton  and
Arleyn W. Simon
James H. Burton
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Archaeological Chemistry, Department of Anthropology, 1180 Observatory Drive, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1393
Arleyn W. Simon
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287–2402
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are some fundamental errors in the arguments of our critics: equating acid extraction with bulk techniques; confusing extractability, the signal of interpretive interest, with analytical error; and, most importantly, presuming that the influences of behavioral choices of prehistoric potters are unwanted “noise” in the data. In confirmation of our original statements, Neff et al., demonstrate that neutron activation analysis (NAA) and acid extraction are independent methods, that the data are not commensurate, and that acid extraction is sensitive to technological choices of prehistoric potters. We agree emphatically. Because ceramic vessels are not idealized geologic materials mined from quarries, but complex technological products, richly embedded with behavioral attributes, we see this behavioral sensitivity of acid extraction as its virtue, not its vice. Acid extraction is a viable compositional tool currently producing significant archaeological results.

Resumen

Resumen

Hay algunos errores fundamentales en los argumentos de nuestros críticos: primeramente la equiparación de la extracción de ácido con técnicas que miden quimicamente el total de los elementos de la muestra (bulk techniques) confundiendo ”extractibilidad,” la señal que nos interesa interpretar, con “error analitico,” y, más importante, la suposición de que las influencias de las opciones de conducta de los ceramistas prehistóricos son un tipo de interferencia analítica no deseada en los datos. De acuerdo con nuestras declaraciones originales, Neffet al. demuestran que el método de activación neutrónica (NAA) y la extracción de ácido son métodos independientes, que los datos no son comparables, y que la extracción es sensible a las elecciones tecnológicas de los ceramistas prehistoricos. Nosotros estamos completamente de acuerdo. Sin embargo, vemos en la extracción de ácido esta sencibilidad al comportamiento del ceramista como su virtud, no como su defecto, ya que las vasijas de cerámica no son materiales geológicos idealizados extraidos de los yacimientos, sino productos tecnológicos complejos, ricamente constituidos con atributos de comportamiento. La extracción de ácido es una herramienta viable para revelar la composición de los materiales, que actualmente está produciendo importantes resultados arqueológicos.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , April 1996 , pp. 405 - 413
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Abbott, D. R. 1994 Chemical Analyses of Clay Fractions on Hohokam Pottery. In Ceramics: The Production and Distribution of Pottery in the Central Phoenix Basin, edited by Abbott, D. R., pp. 91–147. Pueblo Grande Project Vol. 3. Soil Systems, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Abbott, D. R., and Walsh-Anduze, M.-E. 1995 Temporal Patterns without Temporal Variation. In Ceramic Production in the American Southwest, edited by Mills, B. J. and Crown, P.L. pp. 88–114. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Angstadt-Leto, E. 1994 An Argument of the Use of Acid-extraction Inductively-coupled Plasma Emission Spectroscopy in Archaeology. Unpublished Master's thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Arnold, D. E., Neff, H., and Bishop, R. L 1991 Compositional Analysis and “Sources” of Pottery: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach. American Anthropologist 93: 70–90.Google Scholar
Bishop, R. L., Canouts, B., Crown, P. L., and DeAtley, S. P. 1990 Sensitivity, Precision, and Accuracy: Their Roles in Ceramic Compositional Data Bases. American Antiquity 55: 537–546.Google Scholar
Burton, J. H., Heidke, J. M., and Stark, M. T. 1995 ICP Elemental concentrations of sherd samples from the Hedgeapple Site (AZ V: 5: 189/1605). In Ceramic chronology, technology, and economics, edited by Heidke, J. M. and Stark, M.T. pp. 563–571. Roosevelt Community Development Study Anthropological Papers No. 14. Vol. 2. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Burton, J. H., and Simon, A. W. 1993 Acid Extraction as a Simple and Inexpensive Method for Compositional Characterization of Archaeological Ceramics. American Antiquity 58: 45–59.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. E. 1995 Beyond Ceramic Sourcing: Acid-extraction Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectroscopy and Ceramic Production. Unpublished Master's thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Crown, P. L. 1981 Analysis of the Las Colinas Ceramics. In The 1968 Excavations at Mound 8, Las Colinas Ruins Group, Phoenix, Arizona, edited by Hammack, L. and Sullivan, A., pp. 87–117. Archaeological Series Vol. 154. Arizona State Museum, Tucson.Google Scholar
Doelle, W. H., and Wallace, H. D. 1990 The Transition to History in Pimeria Alta. In Perspectives on Southwestern Prehistory, edited by Minnis, P. E. and Redman, C.L. pp. 239–257. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Doelle, W. H., and Wallace, H. D. 1991 The Changing Role of the Tucson Basin in the Hohokam Regional System. In Exploring the Hohokam, edited by Gumerman, G. J., pp. 279–345. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Duff, A. I. 1993 An Exploration of Post-Chacoan Community Organization through Ceramic Sourcing. Unpublished Master's thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Duff, A. I. 1994 The Scope of Post-Chacoan Community Organization in the Lower Zuni River Region. In Exploring Social, Political, and Economic organization in the Zuni region, edited by Howell, T. L. and Stone, T., pp. 25^5. Anthropological Research Papers No. 46. Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Elam, J. M., Carr, C., Glascock, M. D., and Neff, H. 1992 Ultrasonic Disaggregation and Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis of Textural Fractions of Tucson Basin and Ohio Valley Pottery. In Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology, edited by Neff, H., pp. 93–111. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 7. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Fish, P. R., Fish, S. K., Whittlesey, S., Neff, H., Glascock,, M. D. 1992 An Evaluation of the Production and Exchange of Tanque Verde Red-on-Brown Ceramics in Southern Arizona. In Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology, edited by Neff, H., pp. 233–254. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 7. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Harry, K., and Zedeno, M. N. 1996 Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes. In Archaeological Investigations at the SRI Locus, West Branch Site (AZ AA: 16: 3 [ASM]): A Rincon Phase Village in the Tucson Basin, assembled by K. G. Harry. Drafted technical report. Statistical Research, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
Kisselburg, J. E., and Burton, J. H. 1991 Results of the Selective Ion Extraction Analysis of Sherds. In The Riverine Hohokam of the Salt and Verde River Confluence Region, edited by Neily, R. B. and Kisselburg, J.E. pp. 1–11. Vol. 2. Archaeological Consulting Services, Tempe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Neff, H., Bishop, R. L., and Sayre, E. V 1988 A Simulation Approach to the Problem of Tempering in Compositional Studies of Archaeological Ceramics. Journal of Archaeological Science 15: 159–172.Google Scholar
Neff, H., Bishop, R. L., and Sayre, E. V 1989 More Observations on the Problem of Tempering in Compositional Studies of Archaeological Ceramics. Journal of Archaeological Science 16: 57–69.Google Scholar
Plog, S. 1995 Paradigms and Pottery. In Ceramic Production in the American Southwest, edited by Mills, B. J. and Crown, P.L. pp. 268–280. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Rice, P. M. 1987 Pottery Analysis: A Sourcebook. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Simon, A. W. 1993 What Archaeometry Has or Has Not Done for Ceramic Studies. Paper presented at the 58th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, St. Louis.Google Scholar
Simon, A. W. 1994 Compositional Analysis of the Livingston Ceramic Assemblage. In Archaeology of the Salado in the Livingston Area of Tonto Basin: Report on the Livingston Management Group, Pinto Creek Complex, Roosevelt Platform Mound Study. Roosevelt Monograph Series 3. Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Simon, A. W., and Burton, J. H. 1992 Salado Ceramics and Community Relationships. In Proceedings of the Second Salado Conference, Globe, AZ 1992, edited by Lange, R. C. and Germick, S., pp. 259–273. Arizona Archaeological Society, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Simon, A. W., and Burton, J. H. 1992 Patterns of Production and Distribution of Salado Wares as a Measure of Social Complexity. In Developing Perspectives on the Tonto Basin Prehistory, edited by Redman, C. L., Rice, G. E., and Pedrick, K. E., Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Simon, A. W, and Ravesloot, J. C. 1995 Salado Ceramic Burial Offerings: A Consideration of Gender and Social Organization. Journal of Anthropological Research 51: 103–124. Slaughter, M. C.Google Scholar
Simon, A. W, and Ravesloot, J. C. 1995 Mogollon Influence on the Hohokam of the Northeastern Tucson Basin. Paper presented at the 60th Annual Meeting Society for American Archaeology, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
Stark, M. T, Vint, J. M., and Heidke, J. M. 1995 Compositional Variability in Utilitarian Ceramics at a Colonial Period Site. In Ceramic Chronology, Technology, and Economics, edited by Heidke, J. M. and Stark, M.T. pp. 273–296. Roosevelt Community Development Study Anthropology Papers No. 14. Vol. 2. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson.Google Scholar
Stoltman, J. B., Burton, J. H., and Haas, J. 1992 Chemical and Petrographic Characterizations of Ceramic Pastes: Two Perspectives on a Single Data Set. In Chemical Characterization of Ceramic Pastes in Archaeology, edited by Neff, H., pp. 85–92. Prehistory Press, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Stone, T. 1992 The Process of Aggregation in the American Southwest: A Case Study from Zuni. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
Stone, T. 1994 The Process of Aggregation in the Zuni Region: Reasons and Implications. In Exploring Social, Political, and Economic Organization in the Zuni Region, edited by Howell, T. L. and Stone, T., pp. 9–23. Anthropological Research Papers No. 46. Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
White, D. E. 1993 Pinto Polychrome Origin and Distribution, Indicator of Interaction and Trade in East-Central Arizona. Unpublished Master's thesis, Arizona State University, Tempe.Google Scholar
White, D. E., and Burton, J. H. 1992 Pinto Polychrome: A Clue to the Origin of the Salado Polychromes. In Proceedings of the Second Salado Conference, Globe, AZ 1992, edited by Lange, R. C. and Germick, S., pp. 216–222. Arizona Archaeological Society, Phoenix.Google Scholar
Zedeno, M. N. 1994 Sourcing Prehistoric Ceramics at Chodistaas Pueblo, Arizona. Anthropological Papers No. 58. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Zedeno, M. N. 1995 The Role of Population Movement and Technology Transfer in the Manufacture of Prehistoric Southwestern Ceramics. In Ceramic Production in the American Southwest, edited by Mills, B. J. and Crown, P.L. pp. 115–140. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Zedeno, M. N., Busman, J., Burton, J., and Mills, B. J. 1993 Ceramic Compositional Analyses. In Interpretation of Ceramic Artifacts, edited by Mills, B. J., Goetze, C. E., and Zedeno, M. N., pp. 187–233. Across the Colorado Plateau Vol. 16. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar