Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:42:10.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pocitos and Registros: Comments on Water-Control Features at Hierve el Agua, Oaxaca

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William E. Doolittle*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712

Abstract

Salt production has been proffered recently as an alternative explanation to irrigation agriculture for the existence of canals and terraces at the Hierve el Agua site in Oaxaca, Mexico. This argument is based in part on new interpretations of the functions of two types of water-control features. Hewitt et al. (1987) consider the so-called "pocitos" to be natural, and the "registros" to be water tanks or collecting basins. Evidence that contradicts these interpretations is presented here. Pocitos, it is argued, were constructed intentionally in order to facilitate manual irrigation, and registros are drop structures built to regulate the flow of water after the arrival of the Spaniards. Salt making might have been carried out to some extent at the site, but only in late prehistoric and historic times. Hierve el Agua was principally an agricultural site throughout most of its occupation.

Résumé

Résumé

Recientemente, se ha ofrecido la producción de la sal, como una alternativa a la agricultura de irrigación, para explicar la existencia de los canales y las terrazas en el sitio de Hierve el Agua en Oaxaca, México. Este argumento se basa, en parte, sobre las interpretaciónes de las funciónes de dos tipos defactores en el control del agua. Hewitt et al. (1987) consideran los llamados "pocitos" como naturales, y los "registros" como tinacos de agua o cuencas colectivas. Aquí se presentarán pruebas que contradicen estas interpretaciónes. Los "pocitos," se alega, fueron construídos intencionalmente para facilitar la irrigación manual, y los "registros" son estructuras pendientes construídas para regular la corriente del agua después de la llegada de los españoles. Hasta cierto punto, la producción de la sal se puede haber llevado a cabo en el sitio mismo pero solamente en los tiempos históricos y los prehistóricos tardíos. Hierve el Agua fue principalmente un sitio agrícola durante la mayoria del tiempo en que estuvo ocupado.

Type
Comments
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bardsley, W. E. 1978 Note on the Distribution of “Random” Tors on a Line. Mathematical Geology 10 : 375378.Google Scholar
Doolittle, W. E. 1990 Canal Irrigation in Prehistoric Mexico : The Sequence of Technological Change. The University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Drennan, R. D. 1976 Fabrica San Jose and Middle Formative Society in the Valley of Oaxaca. Prehistory and Human Ecology of the Valley of Oaxaca, vol. 4. Memoirs No. 8. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Graham, I. 1980 Spectral Analysis and Distance Methods in the Study of Archaeological Distributions. Journal of Archaeological Science 7 : 105129.Google Scholar
Hewitt, W. P., Winter, M. C., and Peterson, D. A. 1987 Salt Production at Hierve el Agua, Oaxaca. American Antiquity 52 : 799816. International Land Development Consultants Google Scholar
Hewitt, W. P., Winter, M. C., and Peterson, D. A. 1981 Agricultural Compendium for Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics. Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Israelsen, O. W., and Hansen, V. E. 1962 Irrigation Principles and Practices. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Kirkby, A. V. T. 1973 The Use of Land and Water Resources in the Past and Present Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico. Prehistory and Human Ecology of the Valley of Oaxaca, vol. 1. Memoirs No. 5. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. H. (translator) 1914 Vitruvius : The Ten Books on Architecture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Neely, J. A. 1967 Organization hidraulica y sistemas de irrigation prehistoricos en el Valle de Oaxaca. Boletin IN AH 27 : 1517. Mexico.Google Scholar
Neely, J. A. 1970 Terrace and Water Control in the Valley of Oaxaca Region : A Preliminary Report. In Preliminary Archaeological Investigations in the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico, 1966-1969 : A Report to the National Science Foundation and the Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, edited by V. Flannery, Kent, pp. 8387. Report submitted to the National Science Foundation, Washington, D. C. and the Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Neely, J. A. 1971 Field Notes. Notes on file, Department of Anthropology, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Smith, N. A. F. 1976 Attitudes to Roman Engineering and the Question of the Inverted Siphon. History of Technology 1 : 4571.Google Scholar
Stark, B. L., and Young, D. L. 1981 Linear Nearest Neighbor Analysis. American Antiquity 46 : 284300.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. B. 1972 Landlord and Peasant in Colonial Oaxaca. Stanford University Press, Stanford.Google Scholar
Toussaint, M., Benitez, J. R., and Atl, D. 1927 Iglesias de Mexico, vol. 6. Publicaciones de la Secretaria de Hacienda, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Wilken, G. C. 1987 Good Farmers : Traditional Agricultural Resource Management in Mexico and Central America. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, J. D. 1966 Irrigation. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar