Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:14:53.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Physical Properties of Stone Tool Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Mary Ellen Goodman*
Affiliation:
Radcliffe CollegeCambridge, Massachusetts

Extract

The diversity of types of stone tools, as of any other class of artifacts, may be regarded as due to differences in the nature and functional relations of the relevant variables existing in the given situations in which these artifacts were produced. These relevant variables may be conceived as of three major kinds: those associated primarily with the individuality of the given artisan, those arising primarily from the cultural matrix in which the artisan lived and worked, and those directly or indirectly due to the resources and nature of the physical environment in which the artisan and his culture existed. In setting up such categories, a corresponding functional dissociation must not be assumed. Each recognizable element in each category is of course functionally related to every other. But the archae6logist must, in attempting to evaluate his material, schematize in some such fashion. He must evaluate, as well as he can, each of the variables involved.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birch, Francis and Bancroft, Dennison 1938. “The Effect of Pressure on the Rigidity of Rocks.” The Journal of Geology, Vol. 46, No. 1.Google Scholar
Edgerton, Harold E. and Killian, James R. Jr. 1939. Flash Seeing the Unseen by Ultra High-Speed Photography. Hale, Cushman, and Flint, Boston.Google Scholar
Ellis, H. Holmes 1940. Flint-Working Techniques of the American Indians. Columbus. Ohio.Google Scholar
Goldbeck, A. T. and Jackson, F. H. Jr., 1912. Physical Testing of Rock for Road Building, Including the Methods Used and the Results Obtained. U. S. Bureau of Public Roads, Bulletin 44.Google Scholar
Kluckhohn, Clyde 1940. “The Conceptual Structure in Middle American Studies.” In The Maya and Their Neighbors. New York.Google Scholar
Rouse, Irving 1939. Prehistory in Haiti. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 21, New Haven.Google Scholar