Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:04:30.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Olsen and Olsen's Identity Crisis in Faunal Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Peter T. Bobrowsky
Peter T. Bobrowsky*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Corrections and additions to Olsen and Olsen's comment on terminology in faunal studies are provided. It is shown that a single term in faunal studies is not crucial to maintain subdisciplinary communication.

Proper words in proper places make the true de/inition of a style.

—Jonathan Swift

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , January 1982 , pp. 180 - 183
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bohrer, V. L., and Adams, K. R. 1977 Ethnobotanical techniques and approaches at Salmon Ruin, New Mexico. Eastern New Mexico University, Contributions in Anthropoiogy 8(1).Google Scholar
Brothwell, D. R., and Higgs, E. S. 1969 Scientific studies in archaeology. In Science in archaeology, edited by Brothwell, D. R. and Higgs, E. S., pp. 23–34. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Calio, L., Compagnoni, B., and Tosi, M. 1978 Preliminary remarks. In Approaches to faunal analysis in the Middle East, edited by Meadow, R. H. and Zeder, M. A. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Bulletin 2:87–90.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. G. D. 1972 Star Carr: a case study in bioarchaeology. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
Ducos, P. 1973 La signification de quelques parametres statistiques utilises en Paleoethnozoologie. L'Homme, hier et aujourd’ hui, pp. 307–316. Editions Cujas, Paris.Google Scholar
Legge, A. J. 1978 Archaeozoology or zooarchaeology? In Research problems in zooarchaeology, edited by Brothwell, D. R., Thomas, K. D., and Clutton-Brock, J., pp. 129–132. Institute of Archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. L., and Olsen, J. W. 1981 A comment on nomenclature in faunal studies. American Antiquity 46:192–194.Google Scholar
Payne, S. 1972 On the interpretation of bone samples from archaeological sites. In Papers in economic prehistory, edited by Higgs, E. S., pp. 65–81. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Reed, C. A. 1978 Foreword. In Approaches to faunal analysis in the Middle East, edited by Meadow, R. H. and Zeder, A.. Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, Bulletin 2:ix–xi.Google Scholar
Schwartz, J. H. 1973 The palaeozoology of Cyprus: a preliminary report on recently analysed sites. World Archaeology 5:215–220.Google Scholar
Uerpmann, H. P. 1973 Animal bone finds and economic archaeology: a critical study of osteo-archaeological method. World Archaeology 4:307–322.Google Scholar