Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:01:38.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Olmec and Chavin: Reply to Michael D. Coe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Edward P. Lanning
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Starting with a similarity between an Olmec design and a specimen from Kotosh, Coe concludes that all New World civilizations derive from Olmec. This study, like others which would derive Peruvian civilization from Mesoamerican origins, is methodologically weak because it treats traits out of their archaeological context and because it assumes diffusion without considering alternative explanations of similarities.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , July 1963 , pp. 99 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coe, Michael D. 1962 An Olmec Design on an Early Peruvian Vessel. American Antiquity, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 579–80. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Kigoshi, Kunihike and Others 1962 Gakushuin Natural Radiocarbon Measurements I. Radiocarbon, Vol. 4, pp. 84–94. The American Journal of Science, New Haven.Google Scholar