Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:48:35.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the Present Status and Problems of Middle American Archaeology, Part I134

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

J. Alden Mason
J. Alden Mason*
Affiliation:
University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The archaeological knowledge of practically every large area suffers from unevenness. The lure of the spectacular and the overemphasis on the higher aspects result in concentration of interests on a few regions, while other parts remain practically unknown scientifically. In few regions is this more true than in Middle America. To the average person without special interests all Mexican archaeological phenomena are Aztec, just as all South American ones are Inca. Even many sites in the United States have been popularly ascribed to the Aztecs, as for instance the site of Aztec in New Mexico and Aztalan in Wisconsin. Contritely we must confess that similarly some professional archaeologists seem to see little in Middle America but the Maya and their influences.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , January 1938 , pp. 206 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

134

In two parts, the second to appear in the following (April) number.

References

References Cited

Amsden, Monroe 1928. Archaeological Reconnaissance in Sonora. Southwest Museum Papers 8, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bandelier, A. F. 1892. Final Report of Investigations among the Indians of the Southwestern United States. Archaeological Institute of America, American Series 4, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Batres, Leopoldo 1902. Explorations of Monte Alban. Inspección y Conservación de Monumentos Arqueológicos de la República de Mexico, Mexico.Google Scholar
Batres, Leopoldo 1903. Visita a los Monumentos Arqueológicos de La Quemada. Mexico.Google Scholar
Beals, Ralph L. 1932. The Comparative Ethnology of Northern Mexico before 1750. Ibero-Americana 2, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz 1911. Album de Colecciones Arqueológicas; Plates. Publicaciones de la Escuela Internacional de Arqueología y Etnología Americanas, Mexico. (See Gamio, 1921.)Google Scholar
Brand, Donald R. 1935. The Distribution of Pottery Types in Northwest Mexico. Amer. Anthrop., N.S., Vol. 37:287–305.Google Scholar
Brinton, Daniel G. 1887. Were the Toltecs an Historical Nationality? American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Caso, Alfonso 1932. Monte Alban, Richest Archaeological Find in America. National Geographic Magazine 62: 487–512.Google Scholar
Caso, Alfonso 1935. Las Exploraciones en Monte Alban. Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia 18, Mexico.Google Scholar
Caso, Alfonso and Borbolla, De La, Rubin, D. F. 1936. Exploraciones en Mitla. Instituto Panamericano de Geografía e Historia 21, Tacubaya.Google Scholar
Engerrand, Jorge 1912a. Nuevos Petroglifos de la Baja California. Boletin del Museo Nacional 1, No. 10:1–8, Mexico.Google Scholar
Engerrand, Jorge 1912b. Nota Complimentaria acerca de los Petroglifos de la Baja California. Id. 2, No. 1:1–5.Google Scholar
Engerrand, Jorge 1913. Estado Actual de la Cuestion de los Eolitos. Id. 2, No. 8: 149–160.Google Scholar
Fewkes, J. Walter 1907. Certain Antiquities of Eastern Mexico. Bur. Amer. Ethn., 25th Ann. Rept., Washington.Google Scholar
Gamio, Manuel 1910. Los Monumentos Arqueológicos de las Inmediaciones de Chalchihuites, Zacatecas. Anales del Museo Nacional de Arqueología 2:467–492, Mexico.Google Scholar
Gamio, Manuel 1921. Album de Colecciones Arqueológicas; Texto. Publicaciones de la Escuela Internacional de Arqueología y Etnología Americanas, Mexico. (See Boas, 1911.)Google Scholar
Gamio, Manuel 1922. La Población del Valle de Teotihuacán. Secretaría de Agricultura y Fomento, Dirección de Antropología, Mexico.Google Scholar
Garcia, Agustin 1927. Informe sobre las Ruinas de La Quemada. Boletin de la Sec. de Educ. Pub. 6, No. 4, Mexico.Google Scholar
Holmes, W. H. 1897. Archeological Studies among the Ancient Cities of Mexico, 2. Field Museum of Natural History, Anthropological Series 1, No. 1, Chicago.Google Scholar
Hrdlička, Aleš 1903. The “Chichimecs” and Their Ancient Culture, with Notes on the Tepecanos and the Ruin of La Quemada, Mexico. Amer. Anthrop., N. S., Vol. 5: 385–440.Google Scholar
Krickeberg, W. 1918–1925. Die Totonaken. Baessler Archiv 7: 1–55; 9: 1–75, Berlin.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1925. Archaic Culture Horizons in the Valley of Mexico. Univ. of California Publ. in Amer. Ethnol. 17: 373–408.Google Scholar
Lumholtz, Carl 1902. Unknown Mexico. New York.Google Scholar
Mason, J. Alden 1935. The Place of Texas in PreColumbian Relationships between the United States and Mexico. Texas Archaeol. and Paleon. Soc, Bull. 7, Abilene, Texas.Google Scholar
Mason, J. Alden 1935–1937. Reports on current archaeological work in Middle America. Amer. Antiquity 1–3.Google Scholar
Mason, J. Alden 1937. Late Archaeological Sites in Durango, Mexico; from Chalchihiites to Zape. Philadelphia Anthrop. Soc, 25th Ann. Studies, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Moorehead, Warren K. 1932. Etowah Papers 1. Phillips Academy, Department of Anthropology, Andover, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Noguera, Eduardo 1930. Ruinas Arqueológicas del Norte de Mexico. Publ. de la Sec. de Educ. Pub., Dirección de Monumentos Prehispánicos, Mexico.Google Scholar
Noguera, Eduardo 1932. Extensiones Cronológico-Culturales y Geográficas de las Cerámicas de Mexico. 25th Internat. Cong. Amer., Mexico.Google Scholar
Noguera, Eduardo 1935. Antecedentes y Relaciones de la Cultura Teotihuacana. El Mexico Antiguo 3:5–8, Mexico.Google Scholar
Nuttall, Zelia 1910. The Island of Sacrificios. Amer. Anthrop., N. S., Vol. 12: 257–292.Google Scholar
Nuttall, Zelia 1932. Comparison between Etowan, Mexican and Mayan Designs. In Moorehead, 1932.Google Scholar
Roberts, F. H. H. Jr., 1937. Archaeology in the Southwest. Amer. Antiquity 3, No. 1: 3–33.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward 1929. Central and North American Indian Languages. In Encyclopaedia Britannica, 14th Edition.Google Scholar
Sauer, Carl and Brand, Donald 1932. Aztatlan; Prehistoric Mexican Frontier on the Pacific Coast. Ibero-Americana 1, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
Sayles, E. B. 1936. An Archaeological Survey of Chihuahua, Mexico. Gila Pueblo, Medallion Papers 22, Globe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Seler, Caecilie 1916. Die Huaxteca-Sammlung des Kgl. Museums für Völkerkunde. Baessler Archiv 5: 98–136.Google Scholar
Seler, Eduard 1908. Die Ruinen von La Quemada im Staate Zacatecas. Gesammelte Abhandlungen 3: 545–559.Google Scholar
Spinden, H. J. 1928. Ancient Civilizations of Mexico and Central America. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., Handbook Series 3 (third edition), New York.Google Scholar
Spinden, H. J. 1931. Indian Symbolism. Exposition of Indian Tribal Arts, New York.Google Scholar
Staub, Walter 1921. Pre-Hispanic Mortuary Pottery, Sherd Deposits and other Antiquities of the Huaxteca. El Mexico Antiguo 1: 218–237, Mexico.Google Scholar
Strebel, H. 1885–1889. Alt Mexiko. Hamburg und Leipzig.Google Scholar
Studley, Cornelia 1887. Notes upon Human Remains from Caves in Coahuila. Peabody Museum of Harvard, Reports 3: 233–259, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Tarayre, Guillemin 1869. Exploration Minéralogique des Régions Mexicaines. Paris.Google Scholar
Ten Kate, H. 1884. Materiaux pour Servir a l'Anthropologie de la Presq'ile Californienne. Bull, de la Soc. d'Anthrop. de Paris 3, No. 7: 551–569, Paris.Google Scholar
Vaillant, George C. 1932. Some Resemblances in the Ceramics of Central and North America. Gila Pueblo, Medallion Papers 12, Globe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Vaillant, George C. 1935. Early Cultures of the Valley of Mexico. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., Anthrop. Papers 35, No. 3: 281–328, New York.Google Scholar
Vaillant, George C. 1937. History and Stratigraphy in the Valley of Mexico. Scientific Monthly 44: 307–324.Google Scholar