Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:54:30.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on Soil Analysis and Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Ralph S. Solecki
Ralph S. Solecki*
Affiliation:
River Basin Surveys, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With the addition of Carbon 14 dating to the archaeologist's repertory as a technique for determining the actual age of archaeological specimens, this phase of archaeology in America has been put on a more exact basis.

However, preoccupied as we seem to be with “dates,” a method of chemical analysis useful in archaeology and evolved twenty years ago by Arrhenius (1930) and applied by Schnell (1932) in northern Europe has remained unnoticed in this country, although Clark (1936, pp. 19-22) mentions it.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , January 1951 , pp. 254 - 256
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Arrhenius, O. 1930. Lantbrukets Fosforsyrefraga. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Clark, J. O. D. 1936. The Mesolithic Settlement of Northern Europe. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Krieoer, Alex D. 1940. “Chemical Alteration of Archaeological Remains.” American Antiquity Notebook, pp. 126–136. Menasha.Google Scholar
Schnell, Ivar 1932. “Strandlinjebestámningar och markanalys.” Fornvánnen, pp. 40–47. Stockholm.Google Scholar