No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Nature of Feasting at Feltus (and Beyond): A Response to Hayden
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 October 2020
Abstract
My recent article offered a model by which to better classify feasts by distinguishing between archaeological correlates of group size and sociopolitical competition. Applying this model to remains from a precontact mound site, I highlighted feasting's role in promoting group solidarity in the American South. Hayden's comment argues that my scheme does not accommodate certain types of events, and it questions my noncompetitive interpretation. I address both critiques here by citing further data from the Southeast, emphasizing the importance of interpreting feasts within their cultural and historical contexts, and highlighting Hayden's continued reliance on long-standing assumptions about feasting and monumental architecture.
Mi artículo reciente ofreció un modelo para mejorar la clasificación de festines al distinguir entre correlatos arqueológicos del tamaño de grupo y la competencia sociopolítica. Al aplicar este modelo a los restos de un sitio túmulo precontacto, recalqué el papel de festines en la promoción de la solidaridad grupal en el sur de los Estados Unidos. El comentario de Hayden argumenta que mi esquema no se adapta a ciertos tipos de eventos y cuestiona mi interpretación que falta de competición. Aquí, abordo ambas críticas citando mas datos del sudeste, enfatizo la importancia de interpretar los festines dentro de sus contextos culturales e históricos, y recalco la dependencia continua de Hayden en suposiciones de larga duración sobre festines y arquitectura monumental.
Keywords
- Type
- Comments
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of by the Society for American Archaeology
References
References Cited
Carballo, David M. (editor) 2013 Cooperation and Collective Action: Archaeological Perspectives. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Dietler, Michael, and Herbich, Ingrid 2001 Feasts and Labor Mobilization: Dissecting a Fundamental Economic Practice. In Feasts: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics, and Power, edited by Dietler, Michael and Hayden, Brian, pp. 240–264. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Kassabaum, Megan C. 2011 Looking Beyond the Obvious: Identifying Patterns in Coles Creek Mortuary Data. Southeastern Archaeology 30:215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassabaum, Megan C. 2018 Social Subsistence: Integrating Analyses of Ceramic, Plant, and Animal Remains from Feltus. In Baking, Bourbon, and Black Drink: Foodways Archaeology in the American Southeast, edited by Peres, Tanya M. and Deter-Wolf, Aaron, pp. 11–29. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Kassabaum, Megan C., and Nelson, Erin S. 2016 Standing Posts and Special Substances: Ritual Deposition at Feltus, Jefferson County, Mississippi. Southeastern Archaeology 35:134–154.Google Scholar
Long, Scot Eric 2003 The Complexity of Labor Exchange among Amish Farm Households in Holmes County, Ohio. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
Peles, Ashley, and Kassabaum, Megan C. 2020 Reexamining the Evidence for Bear Ceremonialism in the Lower Mississippi Valley. In Bears: Archaeological and Ethnohistorical Perspectives in Native Eastern North America, edited by Lapham, Heather A. and Waselkov, Gregory A., pp. 235–255. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Phillips, Philip 1970 Archaeological Survey in the Lower Yazoo Basin, Mississippi, 1949–1955. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology Vol. 60. Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Pluckhahn, Thomas J. 2013 Cooperation and Competition among Late Woodland Households at Kolomoki, Georgia. In Cooperation and Collective Action: Archaeological Perspectives, edited by Carballo, David M., pp. 175–196. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar