Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:57:43.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metallurgical Analysis of a Hopewell Copper Earspool

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Arlene L. Fraikor ,
James J. Hester  and
Frederick J. Fraikor
Arlene L. Fraikor
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado
James J. Hester
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado
Frederick J. Fraikor
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A prehistoric Hopewell copper earspool was analyzed by a number of metallurgical techniques including transmission electron microscopy. While optical photomicrographs and micro-hardness data suggest that the final fabrication process was annealing, transmission electron microscopy indicates that some final cold working was applied. This paper illustrates a new application of physical analytical techniques to archaeology.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , July 1971 , pp. 358 - 361
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Coughlan, H. H. 1960 Metallurgical analysis of archaeological materials, I. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 28:1–20.Google Scholar
Easby, Dudley T. Jr. 1966 Early metallurgy in the New World. Scientific American 214:72–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Leonard 1951 A metallographic study of certain precolumbian American implements. American Antiquity 17:57–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. B. (Editor) 1961 Lake Superior copper and the Indians: Miscellaneous studies of Great Lakes prehistory. Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Papers 17. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Mack, D. J. 1959 A short tour of archaeological metallurgy. Metal Progress (Dec.): 94–98.Google Scholar
McKern, W. C. 1929 A Wisconsin variant of the Hopewell culture. Public Museum of the City of Milwaukee, Bulletin 10:216.Google Scholar
Moore, C. B. and others 1903 Sheet-copper from the mounds is not necessarily of European origin. American Anthropologist 5:27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, Edward J. 1962 Copper artifact analysis with the X-ray Spectrometer. American Antiquity 28:234–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, George Brinton 1925 The primitive copper industry of America. A merican Anthropologist 27:284–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prufer, Olaf H. 1964 The Hopewell cult. Scientific American 211:90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, Thomas E. 1934 Metallurgical fallacies in archaeological literature. American Journal of Archaeology 38:382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, William C. 1951 Metallurgical analyses and their aid to archaeology. In Essays on Archaeological Methods, Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Papers 8:85–93. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Schroeder, David L., and Ruhl, Katharine C. 1968 Metallurgical characteristics of North American prehistoric copper work. American Antiquity 33:162–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepard, Anna O. 1936 Metallographic study of copper artifacts. American Antiquity 2:139–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U. S. Department of the Interior n.d. Art and burials in ancient Ohio. Eastern National Park and Monument Association and the Mound City Group National Monument, Pamphlet, U. S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
West, George A. 1929 Copper: Its mining and use by the aborigines of the Lake Superior region. Public Museum of the City of Milwaukee, Bulletin 10:1–184.Google Scholar
Willoughby, C. C. 1903 An Early Experiment. In Primitive metal working, discussion as to copper from the mounds, edited by Joseph McQuire, pp. 55–57. American Anthropologist, Special Publication. CrossRefGoogle Scholar