Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:52:41.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Favor of Simple Typology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James A. Ford
James A. Ford*
Affiliation:
American Museum of Natural History, New York, N.Y.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Proponents of the “type-variety” method of ceramic analysis are criticized for mixing analytical units and the rank hierarchies appropriate to synthesis, and for semantically substituting “type-variety” for “type” without actually changing the method of analysis.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , July 1961 , pp. 113 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ford, J. A. 1954 The Type Concept Revisited. American Anthropologist, Vol. 56, No. 1, pp. 42–54. Menasha.Google Scholar
Gifford, J. A. 1960 The Type-Variety Method of Ceramic Classification as an Indicator of Cultural Phenomena. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 341–7. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Gladwin, H. S. 1934 A Method for the Designation of Cultures and Their Variations. Medallion Papers, No. 15. Gila Pueblo, Globe.Google Scholar
McKern, W. C. 1939 The Midwestern Taxinomic Method as an Aid to Archaeological Culture Study. American Antiquity, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 301–13. Menasha.Google Scholar
Neilson, W. A. (Editor) 1961 Webster's New International Dictionary of the English Language. G. and C. Merriam Co., Springfield.Google Scholar
Phillips, Philip 1958 Application of the Wheat-Giffotd-Wasley Taxonomy to Eastern Ceramics. American Antiquity, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 117–25. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Smith, R. E., Willey, G. R., and Gifford, J. C. 1960 The Type-Variety Concept as a Basis for the Analysis of Maya Pottery. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 330–40. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Wheat, J. B., Gifford, J. C., and Wasley, W. W. 1958 Ceramic Variety, Type Cluster, and Ceramic System in Southwestern Pottery Analysis. American Antiquity, Vol. 24, No. 1, PP. 34–47. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R. and Phillips, Philip 1958 Method and Theory in American Archaeology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar