Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T06:28:30.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immunological Identification of Small-Mammal Proteins on Aboriginal Milling Equipment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert M. Yohe II ,
Margaret E. Newman  and
Joan S. Schneider
Robert M. Yohe II
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Margaret E. Newman
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
Joan S. Schneider
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ethnographic accounts of animal pulverization using stone grinding implements have led archaeologists to believe that this same behavior took place in the past. This important subsistence activity can now be confirmed through the immunological analysis of archaeological materials. Small-mammal blood-protein residue has been identified immunologically for the first time on milling equipment from two archaeological sites in southern California. Immunoprotein trace analysis has the potential for a wide range of applications in the study of prehistory.

Résumé

Résumé

Informes etnográficos sobre la pulverización de animales utilizando instrumentos de piedra para moler, ha llevado a arqueólogos a la conclusión de que este mismo tipo de comportamiento tuvo lugar en el pasado. Esta importante actividad de subsistencia ahora puede ser confirmada a través del análisis inmunológico de materiales arqueológicos. Por primera vez se ha identificado inmunológicamente el residuo de la proteína sanguínea de pequeños mamíferos en el equipo de molienda de dos sitios arqueológicos del sur de California. El análisis de inmunoproteínas tiene potencial para un amplio rango de aplicaciones en el estudio de la prehistoria.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 56 , Issue 4 , October 1991 , pp. 659 - 666
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Arquembourg, P. C. 1975 Immunoelectrophoresis. Theory, Methods, Identification, Interpretation. Karger, Basel-Munchen.Google Scholar
Bean, J. L., and Saubel, K. S. 1972 Temalpakh : Cahuilla Indian Knowledge and Usage of Plants. Malki Museum Press, Banning, California.Google Scholar
Briuer, F. L. 1976 New Clues to Stone Tool Function : Plant and Animal Residues. American Antiquity 41 : 478–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broderick, M, 1979 Ascending Paper Chromatographic Technique in Archaeology. In Lithic Use-Wear Analysis, edited by Hayden, B., pp. 375–383. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Callen, E. O. 1963 Diet as Revealed by Coprolites. In Science in Archaeology : A Comprehensive Survey of Progress and Research, edited by Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E., pp. 186–194. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Chace, P. G. 1969 Biological Archaeology of Some Coastal Middens, Orange County, California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 5(2) : 65–77.Google Scholar
Culliford, B. J. 1964 Precipitin Reactions in Forensic Problems. Nature 201 : 1092–1094.Google ScholarPubMed
de Barros, P., and Schneider, J. S. 1989 BLM Land Exchange with ARC Las Flores Limited Partnership, Rancho Las Flores Project : Archaeological Test Excavations at SBr-6179. Submitted to USDI-BLM Barstow Resource Area, Bureau of Land Management, Barstow, California.Google Scholar
Dodson, P., and Wexlar, D. 1979 Taphonomic Investigations of Owl Pellets. Paleobiology 5 : 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, E. F. 1985 An Approach to Detecting and Identifying Blood Residues on Archaeological Stone Artifacts : A Feasibility Study. Center for Materials Research in Archaeology and Ethnology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Drucker, P. 1937 Cultural Element Distributions : V, Southern California. University of California Anthropological Records 1(1), Berkeley.Google Scholar
Farrell, N. 1988 Analysis of Human Coprolites from CA-RIV-1179 and CA-RIV-2827. In Archaeological Investigations at CA-RIV-1179, CA-RIV-2823, and CA-RIV-2827, La Quinta, Riverside County, California, edited by Sutton, M. Q. and Wilke, P. J., pp. 129–142. Archives of California Prehistory No. 20. Coyote Press, Salinas, California.Google Scholar
Fry, G. F. 1976 Analysis of Prehistoric Coprolites from Utah. Anthropological Papers No. 97. University of Utah, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Gaensslen, R. E. 1983 Sourcebook in Forensic Serology, Immunology, and Chemistry. U. S. Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S., and Sanger, F. 1903 The Biological or Precipitin Test for Blood Considered Mainly from Its Medico-Legal Aspect. Journal of Hygiene 11 : 259–290, 354–363.Google Scholar
Hyland, D. C, Adovasio, J. M., Tersak, J. M., Siegel, M. I., and Carr, K. W. 1990 Identification of the Species of Origin of Residual Blood on Lithic Material. American Antiquity 55 : 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korth, W. W. 1979 Taphonomy of Microvertebrate Assemblages. Annals of the Carnegie Museum 48 : 235–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1925 Handbook of Indians of California. Bulletin No. 78. Bureau of American Ethnology, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Lawlor, E. J. 1989 Phytolith Analysis of Residues from Ground Stone from CA-SDi-10246. In The Archaeology of Las Montanas : A Milling Stone Horizon Site, San Diego County, California, by Yohe, R. M. II and Chace, P. G., Appendix 2. Submitted to San Diego County Planning Department, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Lee, H. C, and Deforest, P. R. 1976 A Precipitin-Inhibition Test on Denatured Bloodstains for the Determination of Species of Origin. Journal of Forensic Science 21 : 804–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, R. B., and DeVore, I. 1966 Man the Hunter. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
McLendon, S., and Lowy, M. J. 1978 Eastern Porno and Southeastern Porno. In California, edited by Heizer, R. F., pp. 306–323. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 8, Sturtevant, W. G., general editor. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Michelsen, R. 1967 Pecked Metates in Baja California. The Masterkey 41(2) : 73–77.Google Scholar
Napton, L. K., and Heizer, R. F. 1970 Analysis of Human Coprolites from Archaeological Contexts, with Primary Reference to Lovelock Cave, Nevada. In Archaeology and the Prehistoric Great Basin Lacustrine Subsistence Regime as Seen from Lovelock Cave, Nevada, edited by Heizer, R. F. and Napton, L. K., pp. 87–130. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Newman, M. 1988 The Hidden Evidence from Hidden Cave, Nevada. Paper presented at the 21st Great Basin Anthropological Conference, Park City, Utah.Google Scholar
Newman, M., and Julig, P. 1989 The Identification of Protein Residues on Lithic Artifacts from a Stratified Boreal Forest Site. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 13 : 119–132.Google Scholar
Nuttal, H. F. 1904 Blood Immunity and Blood Relationship. University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sensabaugh, G. F., Wilson, A. C., and Kirk, P. L. 1971 Protein Stability in Preserved Biological Remains, Parts I and II. International Journal of Biochemistry 2 : 545–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer, H. H., and Holloway, R. G. 1979 Organic Residue Analysis in Determining Stone Tool Function. In Lithic Use-Wear Analysis, edited by Hayden, B., pp. 385–399. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Shipek, F. 1970 The Autobiography ofDelphina Cuero, a Diegueno Indian. Malki Press, Banning, California.Google Scholar
Sparkman, P. S. 1908 The Culture of the Luiseno Indians. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 8(4), Berkeley.Google Scholar
Stahl, P. W. 1982 On Small Mammal Remains in Archaeological Context. American Antiquity 47 : 822–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, M. Q. 1988 Insects as Food : Aboriginal Entomophagy in the Great Basin. Anthropological Papers No. 33. Ballena Press, Menlo Park, California.Google Scholar
Szuter, C. R. 1984 Faunal Exploitation and the Reliance on Small Animals among the Hohokam. In Environment and Subsistence, Hohokam Archaeology along the Salt-Gila Aqueduct Central Arizona Project, vol. VII, edited by Teague, L. S. and Crown, P. L., pp. 139–169. Archaeological Series No. 150. University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Szuter, C. R. 1989 Hunting By Prehistoric Horticulturalists in the American Southwest. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. H. 1969 Great Basin Hunting Patterns : A Quantitative Method for Treating Faunal Remains. American Antiquity 34 : 392–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, W. J. 1955 A Suggested Chronology for Southern California Coastal Archaeology. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 11 : 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilke, P. J. 1978 Late Prehistoric Human Ecology at Lake Cahuilla, Coachella Valley, California. University of California Archaeological Research Facility Contributions No. 38. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Yohe, R. M. II, and Chace, P. G. 1989 The Archaeology of Las Montahas : A Milling Stone Horizon Site, San Diego County, California. Submitted to San Diego Planning Department, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
Yohe, R. M. II, and Newman, M. E. 1991 Blood Residue Analysis : New Applications in the Study of Archaeological Assemblages. Paper presented at the 56th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans. Google Scholar