Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T13:24:57.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Horizon Styles and Pottery Traditions in Peruvian Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Gordon R. Willey
Gordon R. Willey*
Affiliation:
Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Present paper is partially devoted to a consideration of the concept of “horizon styles” in Peruvian archaeology: how the concept has been used in archaeological reconstruction, and how new styles are in the process of formulation. It includes also an analysis of several ceramic periods which may be grouped into such a horizon style, the White-on-red. Differing from the horizon style is another historical phenomenon which I have called the “pottery tradition.” An attempt is made here to show the relationship of these two concepts— horizon styles and pottery traditions—as they are exemplified in Peruvian archaeology.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , July 1945 , pp. 49 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, W. C. 1943. “The Position of Chavín in Andean Sequences.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 323–327.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. C. 1944. The North Highlands of Peru, Excavations in the Callejón de Huaylas and at Chavin de Huántar, Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 39, Pt. 1.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1925. The Uhle Pottery Collections from Supe. University of California Publications in America Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 21, No. 6.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1926. The Uhle Pottery Collections from Chancay. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 21, No. 7.Google Scholar
Kroeber, A. L. 1944. Archaeology in Peru in 1942. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, No. 4.Google Scholar
Larco Hoyle, Rafael 1941. Los Cupisniques. Lima, Peru.Google Scholar
Linton, Ralph 1944. “North American Cooking Pots.” American Antiquity, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 369–380.Google Scholar
Strong, W. D. 1925. The Uhle Pottery Collections from Ancon. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 21, No. 4.Google Scholar
Strong, W. D., and Corbett, John M. 1943. A Ceramic Sequence at Pachacamac. Columbia Studies in Archeology and Ethnology, Vol. 1, Pt.2.Google Scholar
Uhle, Max 1908. “Über die Fr ühkulturen in.der Umgebung von Lima.” Sixteenth International Congress of Americanists, Vienna, 1908, pp. 347–370.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. 1943. Excavations in the Chancay Valley. Columbia University Studies in Archeology and Ethnology, Vol. 1, Pt. 3.Google Scholar