Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:11:11.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

History and Distribution of the Cultivated Cucurbits in the Americas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hugh C. Cutler  and
Thomas W. Whitaker
Hugh C. Cutler
Affiliation:
Missouri Botanical Garden and Washington University, St. Louis, Mo.
Thomas W. Whitaker
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture, La Jolla, Calif.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

All species of Cucurbita (which includes squashes, pumpkins, and the common, small, yellow-flowered gourds) are native to the Americas. Their center of origin lies in Mexico where most of the 26 wild and cultivated species still grow. Chilicayote (C. ficifolia), a perennial and probably the oldest cultivated species, is grown from Mexico to Bolivia and known archaeologically only from coastal Peru (3000 B.C.). Oldest archaeological cucurbits are C. pepo and Lagenaria siceraria, the bottle gourd. Specimens of these species were recovered from Tamaulipas in cave material dated 7000-5500 B.C. Pepo and Lagenaria spread over most of the United States probably with the advent of agriculture. Cucurbita moschata appeared in coastal Peru at the same time as C. ficifolia (3000 B.C.), but it does not occur in the Ocampo Cave cultures until 1400-400 B.C. when pottery and village life entered, and corn, cotton, pepo, and beans (common, lima and jack) were being grown. While the earliest dates for moschata in southwestern United States are about A.D. 1100, it probably entered the same time as cotton, perhaps as early as A.D. 700. Cucurbita mixta, the cushaw, is the most recent of the cultivated species. It is found mainly in Mexico and in post-A.D. 1000 sites in the southwestern U.S. Prehistoric C. maxima is known only from Peru and to the south and east in Chile and Bolivia. Its ancestors probably were carried there by man from the Mexican center, and the weedy C. andreana may have been taken along at the same time.

The bottle gourd is most variable in the Old World. It probably originated there, and was carried to the New World in pre-agricultural times by ocean currents. A number of other cucurbits and the tree gourd, Crescentia cujete, not a true gourd but a member of the family Big-noniaceae, are briefly mentioned. Parts useful in identifying the cultivated cucurbits are the fruit stem or peduncle, seeds, rind, and leaves. A list of the collections of Cucurbita and Lagenaria which have been studied is given, with estimates for the date of each site.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , April 1961 , pp. 469 - 485
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, L. H. 1943. Species of Cucurbita . Gentes Herbarum, Vol. 4, Art. 6, pp. 267–316. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Bailey, L. H. 1948. Jottings in the Cucurbitas. Gentes Herbarum, Vol. 7, Art. 6, pp. 449–77. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Burkill, I. H. 1935. A Dictionary of the Economic Products of the Malay Peninsula, two volumes. Crown Agents for the Colonies, London.Google Scholar
Carter, G. F. 1945 Some Archeologic Cucurbit Seed from Peru. Acta Americana, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 163–72.Google Scholar
Cutler, H. C. and Whitaker, T. W. 1956. Cucurbita mixta Pang.: Its Classification and Relationships. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, Vol. 83, No. 4, pp. 253–60. New York.Google Scholar
Martin, P. S., Rinaldo, J. B., Bluhm, Elaine, Cutler, H. C., and Grange, Roger Jr. 1952. Mogollon Cultural Continuity and Change. Fieldiana: Anthropology, Vol. 40. Chicago Natural History Museum, Chicago.Google Scholar
Schweinfurth, George 1884. Neue Funde auf dem Gebiete der Flora des alten Ägyptens. Botanische jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie, Vol. 5, pp. 189–202. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Tapley, W. T., Enzie, W. D., and Van Eseltine, G. P. 1937. The Vegetables of New York, Part IV: The Cucurbits. Report of the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station for 1935. Albany.Google Scholar
Vavilov, N. I. 1931. Mexico and Central America as the Principal Centers of Cultivated Plants of the New World. Bulletin of Applied Botany and Plant Breeding, Vol. 26, pp. 139–248. Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences in U.S.S.R., Institute of Plant Industry, Leningrad.Google Scholar
Vestal, P. A. 1938. Cucurbita moschata Found in Pre-Columbian Mounds in Guatemala. Harvard University Botanical Leaflets, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 65–9. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Whitaker, T. W. and Bird, J. B. 1949. Identification and Significance of the Cucurbit Materials from Huaca Prieta, Peru. American Museum Novitiates, No. 1426, pp. 1–15. American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
Whitaker, T. W. and Bohn, G. W. 1950. The Taxonomy, Genetics, Production, and Uses of the Cultivated Species of Cucurbita . Economic Botany, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 52–81. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Whitaker, T. W. and Carter, G. F. 1954. Oceanic Drift of Gourds: Experimental Observations. American Journal of Botany, Vol. 41, No. 9, pp. 697–700. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Whitaker, T. W., Cutler, H. C., and MacNeish, R. S. 1957. Cucurbit Materials from Three Caves near Ocampo, Tamaulipas. American Antiquity, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 352–8. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Whiting, A. F. 1939. Ethnobotany of the Hopi. Museum of Northern Arizona, Bulletin, No. 15. Flagstaff.Google Scholar