Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:51:15.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

GROWTH OF A VILLAGE: USING FLUORIDE ANALYSIS AND ARTIFACT FREQUENCIES TO EXAMINE EARLY FORT ANCIENT/MISSISSIPPIAN HOUSEHOLD AND SITE FORMATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2018

Robert A. Cook*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, 1179 University Drive, Newark, OH 43055USA
Mark R. Schurr
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Notre Dame, 296 Corbett Family Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556USA
*
([email protected], corresponding author)

Abstract

Examining the formation histories of single-component prehistoric villages is difficult using only radiocarbon dating. This study investigates such a case with the added considerations of two relative dating techniques, artifact accumulation and fluoride dating, at the Guard site (12D29), an early (ca. AD 1000–1300) Fort Ancient/Mississippian village located in southeast Indiana. The goal was to assess the depositional history of the individual house basins and, if possible, to determine a relative sequence of construction within the village. The observed relationship between relative artifact frequencies and fluoride levels was statistically examined with the expected result being that fluoride concentrations and artifact frequencies are significantly correlated. Houses built initially contained lower relative artifact frequencies, whereas houses built more recently contained higher relative artifact frequencies. This pattern is further explored with artifact and fluoride distinctions in vertical stratigraphy, which show that some structures were slowly filled with midden trash, whereas others were more likely rapidly filled during the latter part of the village occupation, perhaps at the time of site abandonment. Overall, the results are very promising and consistent with the SunWatch site, the only other Fort Ancient culture site with a defined construction sequence, establishing a general pattern of village development in the study region.

Es difícil investigar las historias de formación de las aldeas prehistóricas con una sola ocupación basándose únicamente en fechas de radiocarbono. En este estudio se investiga una de tales aldeas utilizando dos técnicas de fechamiento relativo: la acumulación de artefactos y el fechamiento a base de fluoruro. El caso de estudio es el sitio de Guard (12D29), una aldea temprana (ca. 1000–1300 dC.) de la cultura Fort Ancient/Misisipiana ubicada en el sureste del estado de Indiana. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la historia deposicional de las fosas individuales de cada casa para determinar si es posible documentar una secuencia relativa de construcción para la aldea. Pruebas estadísticas de la relación observada entre las densidades de artefactos y los niveles de fluoruro indican que estos están correlacionadas, lo cual fue el resultado esperado. Las casas construidas al inicio de la ocupación del sitio tienen densidades de artefactos comparativamente bajas, mientras que las casas construidas más recientemente tienen densidades de artefactos comparativamente altas. Este patrón aparentemente contradictorio se explica por las distinciones entre artefactos y fluoruro en la estratigrafía vertical. Estas muestran que algunas estructuras fueron rellenadas paulatinamente con desechos, mientras que otras casas probablemente fueron rellenadas de manera comparativamente rápida durante los años finales de la ocupación del sitio. En general, los resultados son muy prometedores y consistentes con los datos procedentes del sitio de SunWatch. Este último es el único otro sitio de la cultura Fort Ancient que tiene una secuencia constructiva definida, lo que establece un patrón general del desarrollo para las aldeas de la región.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by the Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Bigman, Daniel P., King, Adam, and Walker, Chester P. 2011 Recent Geophysical Investigations and New Interpretations of Etowah's Palisade. Southeastern Archaeology 30:3850.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1982 The Archaeology of Place. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1:531.Google Scholar
Brooks, Robert L. 1993 Household Abandonment among Sedentary Plains Societies: Behavioral Sequences and Consequences in the Interpretation of the Archaeological Record. In Abandonment of Settlement and Regions: Ethnoarchaeological and Archaeological Approaches, edited by Cameron, Catherine M. and Tomka, Steve A., pp. 178187. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Butler, Brian M., Berle Clay, R., Hargrave, Michael L., Peterson, Steffan D., Schwegman, John E., Schwegman, John A., and Welch, Paul D. 2011 A New Look at Kincaid: Magnetic Survey of a Large Mississippian Town. Southeastern Archaeology 30:2037.Google Scholar
Cameron, Catherine M. 1991 Structure Abandonment in Villages. Archaeological Method and Theory 3:155191.Google Scholar
Cook, Robert A. 2007 Single Component Sites with Long Sequences of Radiocarbon Dates: The SunWatch Site and Middle Fort Ancient Village Growth. American Antiquity 72:439460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Robert A. 2008 SunWatch: Fort Ancient Development in the Mississippian World. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Cook, Robert A. 2017 Continuity and Change in the Native American Village: Multicultural Origins and Descendants of the Fort Ancient Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Robert A., Comstock, Aaron R., Martin, Kristie R., Burks, Jarrod, Church, Wendy, and French, Melissa 2015 Early Village Life in Southeastern Indiana: Recent Field Investigations at the Guard Site (12D29). Southeastern Archaeology 34:95115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Robert A., Comstock, Aaron R., and Schulenburg, Marcus A. 2018 Exploring the Plaza of an Early Fort Ancient Village: Results of 2016–2017 Excavations at the Guard Site (12D29), Dearborn County, Indiana. Submitted to the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Indianapolis. Copies available from the Department of Natural Resources, Indianapolis, Indiana.Google Scholar
Cook, Robert A., Schulenburg, Marcus A., and Comstock, Aaron R. 2016 Assessing Household Architecture in an Early Fort Ancient Village: Results of the 2014 Field Season at the Guard Site (12D29), Dearborn County, Indiana. Submitted to the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Indianapolis. Copies available from the Department of Natural Resources, Indianapolis, Indiana.Google Scholar
Diehl, Michael W. 1998 The Interpretation of Archaeological Floor Assemblages: A Case Study from the American Southwest. American Antiquity 63:617634.Google Scholar
Guerrero, Emma, Schurr, Mark R., Kuijt, Ian, Anfruns, Josep, and Molist, Miquel 2011 Timing the Neolithic Transition: The Application of Fluoride Dating at Tell Halula, Syria. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:14961501.Google Scholar
Heilman, James M., Lileas, Malinda C., and Turnbow, Christopher A. (editors) 1988 A History of 17 Years of Excavation and Reconstruction: A Chronicle of 12th Century Human Values and the Built Environment. Dayton Society of Natural History, Dayton, Ohio.Google Scholar
Holdaway, Simon, and Wandsnider, LuAnn (editors) 2008 Time in Archaeology: Time Perspectivism Revisited. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Fan, Xianfeng, Parker, David J., and Smith, Michael D. 2003 Adsorption Kinetics of Fluoride on Low Cost Materials. Water Research 37:49294937.Google Scholar
Krus, Anthony, Cook, Robert A., and Hamilton, Derek 2015 Bayesian Chronological Modeling of SunWatch, Dayton, Ohio. Radiocarbon 57:113.Google Scholar
Labastida, Israel, Armienta, Maria A., Beltrán, Margarita, Caballero, G., Romero, Pedro, and Rosales, Miguel A. 2017 Limestone as a Sustainable Remediation Option for Water Contaminated with Fluoride. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 183:206213.Google Scholar
Nickell, Alan K. 1981 Soil Survey of Dearborn and Ohio Counties, Indiana. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Oakley, Kenneth P. 1951 The Fluorine-Dating Method. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 5:4452.Google Scholar
Peterson, Steffan 2015 Lost Mississippian Towns Found on the Ohio. In Medieval Mississippians: The Cahokian World, edited by Pauketat, Timothy R. and Alt, Susan M., pp. 8085. School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe, New Mexico.Google Scholar
Reidhead, Van A. 1981 A Linear Programming Model of Prehistoric Subsistence Optimization: A Southeastern Indiana Example. Indiana Prehistory Research Series 6(1). Indiana Historical Society, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1983 Toward the Identification of Formation Processes. American Antiquity 48:675706.Google Scholar
Cook, Robert A. 1987 Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Schurr, Mark R. 1989 Fluoride Dating of Prehistoric Bones by Ion-Selective Electrode. Journal of Archaeological Science 16:265270.Google Scholar
Schurr, Mark R., and Gregory, David A. 2002 Fluoride Dating of Faunal Materials by Ion-Selective Electrode: High Resolution Relative Dating at an Early Agricultural Period Site in the Tucson Basin. American Antiquity 67:281299.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Alan P. III 2008 Ethnoarchaeological and Archaeological Perspectives on Ceramic Vessels and Annual Accumulation Rates of Sherds. American Antiquity 73:121135.Google Scholar
Wilk, Richard R. 1983 Little House in the Jungle: The Causes of Variation in House Size among Modern Kekchi Maya. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2:99116.Google Scholar
Wrobel, Gabriel 2007 Issues Related to Determining Burial Chronology by Fluoride Analysis of Bone from the Maya Archaeological Site of Chau Hiix, Belize. Archaeometry 49:699711.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Cook and Schurr supplementary material

Cook and Schurr supplementary material 1

Download Cook and Schurr supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 394.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Cook and Schurr supplementary material

Table S1

Download Cook and Schurr supplementary material(File)
File 35.1 KB