Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-21T16:28:44.974Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Great Basin Hunting Patterns: A Quantitative Method for Treating Faunal Remains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

David H. Thomas
David H. Thomas*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent excavation and subsequent analysis have been undertaken for the express purpose of deriving quantitative techniques for the analysis of faunal remains from archaeological sites. Experiments were conducted which indicate that significant amounts of bones are lost through the various meshes of screen used by archaeologists. Factors were then calculated to alleviate this problem and to yield results amenable to rigorous quantitative treatment. Results obtained in this manner can add accuracy to most salvage operations and credibility to the more ideal excavation conditions. The proposed method was applied to data from Smoky Creek Cave, a Medithermal site approximately 40 mi. north of Gerlach, Washoe County, Nevada; results indicate a pattern of cottontail rabbit and mountain sheep hunting similar to the model which Flannery has proposed for the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , October 1969 , pp. 392 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baumhoff, M. A. and Byrne, J. S. 1959 Desert Side-notched Points as a Time Marker in California. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, No. 48, pp. 32–65. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Castetter, E. F. and Bell, W. H. 1942 Pima and Papago Indian Agriculture. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Clewlow, C. W. Jr. 1967 Time and Space Relations of Some Great Basin Projectile Point Types. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, No. 70, pp. 21–35. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Dick, Herbert 1965 Bat Cave. School of American Research Monograph, No. 27. Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent 1966 The Postglacial “Readaptation” as Viewed from Mesoamerica. American Antiquity, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 800–05. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent 1968 The Vertebrate Fauna and Hunting Patterns. In The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, edited by Douglas Byers, Vol. 1, pp. 132–78. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Grosscup, Gordon 1960 The Culture History of Lovelock Cave, Nevada. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, No. 52, pp. 1–72. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Haury, Emil 1950 The Stratigraphy and Archaeology of Ventana Cave, Arizona. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. and Baumhoff, M. A. 1961 The Archaeology of Two Sites. I. Wagon Jack Shelter. University of California Anthropological Papers, Vol. 20, No. 4. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. and Baumhoff, M. A. 1962 Prehistoric Rock Art of Nevada and Eastern California. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lanning, Edward P. 1963 Archaeology of the Rose Spring Site, California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 49, No. 3. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Layton, Thomas N. 1966 The Archaeology of Smokey Creek Cave, Humboldt County, Nevada: 26-Hu-46. MS, Master’s thesis, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Layton, Thomas N. 1967 The Harvard-Nevada Expedition: A Report on Activities during the 1967 Field Season. MS on file at the Nevada State Museum, Carson City.Google Scholar
MacNeish, Richard S. 1968 A Summary of the Subsistence. In The Prehistory of the Tehuacán Valley, edited by Douglas Byers, Vol. 1, pp. 290–310. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Michelsen, Ralph C. 1967 Pecked Metates of Baja California. The Master-key, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 73–7. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
O’Connell, James F. 1967 Elko Eared/Elko Corner-notched Projectile Points as Time Markers in the Great Basin. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, No. 70, pp. 129–40. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Reed, Charles A. 1963 Osteo-Archaeology. In Science in Archaeology, edited by Don Brothwell and Eric Higgs, pp. 204–16. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Snedecor, George W. and Cochran, William G. 1967 Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Steward, Julian H. 1938 Basin-Plateau Aboriginal Sociopolitical Groups. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin, No. 120. Washington.Google Scholar
White, T. A. 1953 A Method of Calculating the Dietary Percentage of Various Food Animals Utilized by Aboriginal Peoples. American Antiquity, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 396–8. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Zlegler, A. C. 1965 The Role of Faunal Remains in Archaeological Investigations. In “Symposium on Central California Archaeology,” edited by Freddie Curtis, Sacramento Anthropological Society Papers, No. 3, pp. 47–75. Sacramento.Google Scholar