Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:53:17.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynastic Genealogies from Tikal, Guatemala: Implications for Descent and Political Organization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William A. Haviland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Building upon the work of several other people, Clemency Coggins has recently presented a tentative reconstruction of Tikal dynastic history, complete with a proposed genealogy of the rulers themselves. These are important data for any attempt to reconstruct the social and political organization of Tikal, and this paper explores their implications. The data are consistent with models of ancient Maya sociopolitical organization in which patrilineal descent, stratification, and strong central political authority were important. At Tikal, this seems to have been the case from the first century A.D. until Terminal Classic times. A currently popular view that, in Early Classic times, positions of prestige, power, and authority were open to anyone who had the necessary talent, wealth, and support is probably untenable, at least for Tikal.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 42 , Issue 1 , January 1977 , pp. 61 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aberle, D. F. 1961 Matrilineal descent in cross-cultural perspective. In Matrilineal kinship, edited by Schneider, D. M. and Gough, K., pp. 655–727. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Coggins, C. C. 1975 Painting and drawing styles at Tikal. Ph.D dissertation, Harvard University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Coult, A. D. 1964 Role allocation, position structuring, and ambilineal descent. A merican A nthropologist 66:2940.Google Scholar
Coult, T. P. 1974 The lost civilization: the story of the Classic Maya. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Goodenough, W. H. 1970 Description and comparison in cultural anthropology. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Haviland, W. A. 1967 Stature at Tikal, Guatemala: implications for Classic Maya demography and social organization. American Antiquity 32:316–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haviland, W. A. 1968 Ancient lowland Maya social organization. Middle American Research Institute Publication 26:93–117.Google Scholar
Haviland, W. A. 1972 A new look at Classic Maya social organization at Tikal. Ceramica de Cultura Maya 8:1–16.Google Scholar
Haviland, W. A. 1975 Tikal Report No. 22: Excavations in Residential Areas of Tikal: Group 7E-1, an Elite Residential Group. Manuscript, Tikal Project, University Museum, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Helms, M. W. 1975 Middle A merica: a culture history of heartland and frontiers. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Jones, C. 1977 Inauguration dates of three Late Classic rulers of Tikal, Guatemala. American Antiquity (this volume).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, J. 1973 Territorial organization of the lowland Classic Maya. Science 180:911–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baumhoff, M. A., and Heizer, R. F. 1961a The distinctive features of matrilineal descent groups. In Matrilineal kinship, edited by Schneider, D. M. and Gough, K., pp. 1–29. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Baumhoff, M. A., and Heizer, R. F. 1961b Truk. In Matrilineal kinship, edited by Schneider, D. M. and Gough, K., pp. 202–33. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Service, E. R. 1971 Primitive social organization (2nd edition). Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Willey, G. R., and Shimkin, D. B. 1973 The Maya collapse: a summary view. In The Classic Maya collapse, edited by Culbert, T. P., pp. 457–501. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar