Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:49:30.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Dynamics of Significance: An Example from Central Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark J. Lynott
Mark J. Lynott*
Affiliation:
Midwest Archaeological Center, National Park Service, Lincoln, NE 68508
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The process of evaluating archaeological significance is dynamic and constantly changing. Factors affecting the significance evaluation process are considered, and an example of how the evaluation of significance at a central Texas rockshelter has changed over the last thirty years is offered.

Type
Cultural Resource Management
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , January 1980 , pp. 117 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Galm, Jerry R. 1978 Archaeological investigations at Wister Lake, LeFlore County, Oklahoma. University of Oklahoma, Archaeological Research and Management Center, flesearch Series No. 1.Google Scholar
Glassow, Michael A. 1977 Issues in evaluating the significance of archaeological resources. American Antiquity 42:413–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Thomas F., Hickman, Patricia Parker, and Berg, Gary 1977 Anthropology in historic preservation. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Lynott, Mark J. 1978 An archaeological assessment of the Bear Creek Shelter, Lake Whitney, Texas. Archaeology ResearchProgram, Southern Methodist University, Research Report No. 115.Google Scholar
Moratto, Michael J., and Kelly, Roger E. 1977 Significance in archeology. The Kiva 42(2):193–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moratto, Michael J., and Kelly, Roger E. 1978 Optimizing strategies for evaluating archaeological significance. In Advances in archaeologicalmethod and theory, vol. 1, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 193–202. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Raab, L. Mark, and C. Klinger, Timothy 1977 A critical appraisal of “significance” in contract archaeology. American Antiquity 42:629–634.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., and Gumerman, George J. 1977 Assessing significance. In Conservation archaeology: a guide for cultural resource managementstudies, edited by Schiffer, M. B. and Gumerman, G. J., pp. 239–247. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., and House, John H. 1977 An approach to assessing scientific significance. In Conservation archaeology: a guide for culturalmanagement studies, edited by Schiffer, M. B. and Gumerman, G. J., pp. 249–257. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Scovill, Douglas H., Gordon, Garland J., and Anderson, Keith M. 1972 Guidelines for the preparation of statement of environmental impact on archaeological resources. Arizona Archaeological Center National Park Service, Tucson.Google Scholar
Skinner, S. Alan, and G. Gallagher, Joseph 1974 An evaluation of the archaeological resources at Lake Whitney. Texas Southern Methodist University Contributions in Anthropology 14:18–23.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Robert L. 1970 Archaeological investigations in the Whitney Reservoir area, Central Texas. Bulletin of the TexasArcheological Society 40:37–286.Google Scholar