Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T12:07:39.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Discovering Childhood: Using Fingerprints to Find Children in the Archaeological Record

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kathryn A. Kamp
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA 50112-0806
Nichole Timmerman
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA 50112-0806
Gregg Lind
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA 50112-0806
Jules Graybill
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA 50112-0806
Ian Natowsky
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA 50112-0806

Abstract

Experimental replications show that ridge breadth measurements from fingerprints on archaeological artifacts can be used to estimate the age of the individual who produced the prints. While the greatest amount of variability in human ridge breadth is due to the growth during development from birth to adulthood, there is also variability due to hand and body size, sex, and ethnicity. Despite these confounding variables, the variability due to age is great enough to allow the separation of children’s prints from those of adults using ridge breadths. The utility of this measurement is illustrated with a short case study using ceramic vessels and figurines from northern Arizona. This discovery has great potential for illuminating some of the roles that children played in prehistory.

Résumé

Résumé

Réplicas experimentales muestran que las medidas de los cordoncillos de huellas digitales en los restos arqueológicos sirven para estimar la edad del individuo que produjo las huellas. Mientras que la variación más amplia en los espacios de cordoncillos se deben al crecimiento durante el desarrollo entre el nacimiento y la edad adulta, hay variación también debida al tamaño de la mano y el cuerpo, al sexo, y a la etnicidad. A despecho de estas variaciones confusas, la variación por causa de la edad es tanta que se puede distinguir las huellas digitales de niños de las de adultos. La utilidad de la medida es ilustrada con una breve investigación usando vasos y estatuillas cerámicos del norte de Arizona. Este descubrimiento tiene potencial enorme para iluminar algunos de los roles que los niños tuvieron en la prehistoria.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Akins, N. J. 1986 A Biocultural Approach to Human Burials from Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. National Park Service, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Bartlett, K. 1941 Skeletal Material from Winona and the Ridge Ruin. In Winona and Ridge Ruin, Part I: Architecture and Material Culture, edited by McGregor, J. C., pp. 300305. Bulletin 18. Museum of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff.Google Scholar
Colton, H. S. 1955 Pottery Types of the Southwest. Series 3 A. Museum of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff.Google Scholar
Colton, H. S. 1958 Pottery Types of the Southwest: Revised Descriptions of Alameda Brown, Prescott Gray, San Francisco Mountain Gray Wares, Wards 14, 15,16, 17,18. Ceramic Series 3D. Museum of Northern Arizona, Flagstaff.Google Scholar
Cummins, H., Waits, W. J., and McQuitty, J. T. 1941 The Breadths of Epidermal Ridges of the Fingertips and Palm. American Journal of Anatomy 68: 127151.Google Scholar
David, T. J. 1981 Distribution, Age, and Sex Variation of the Mean Epidermal Ridge Breadth. Human Heredity 31: 279282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Genoves, S 1967 Proportionality of Long Bones and Their Relations to Stature Among Mesoamericans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 26: 6778.Google Scholar
Hecht, A.F. 1924 Uber das Hand- und Fussflachenrelief von Kindern. Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Experimentelle Medizin 39: 5666.Google Scholar
Holt, S. B. 1968 The Genetics of Dermal Ridges. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois.Google Scholar
Jantz, R. L., and Parham, K. R. 1978 Racial Differences in Dermal Ridge Breadth. Human Biology 50 (1): 334.Google Scholar
Kamali, M. S. 1984 Mean Epidermal Ridge Breadth among the 12 Iranian Endogamous Groups. Indian Journal of Physical Anthropology and Human Genetics 10 (3 and 4): 150154.Google Scholar
Kamp, K., and Whittaker, J. 1999 Surviving Adversity: Life in an Elden Phase Sinagua Village. Anthropological Papers No. 120. University of Utah, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Katznelson, M., and Ashbel, S. 1973 Dermatoglyphics of Jews: Normal Ashkenazi Populations. Zeitschrift fiir Morphologie und Anthropologic 65: 1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leguebe, A., and Vrydagh, S. 1982 Geographical Variability of Digital Ridge-counts: Univariate Comparison of Population Groups. Homo 33 (4): 183194.Google Scholar
Loesch, D., and Czyzewska, J. 1972 Ridge Breadth in the a-b Segment in the Hands of Children. Folia morphologica 31 (2): 226230.Google Scholar
Micle, S., and Kobyliansky, E. 1987 Dermatoglyphic Sexual Dimorphism in Yemenite Jews. Bulletins etMemoires de la Societe d'Anthropologic de Paris 4 (2): 95114.Google Scholar
Ohler, E.A., and Cummins, H. 1942 Sexual Differences in Breadth of Epidermal Ridges of Fingertips and Palms. American Journal ofPhysical Anthropology 29: 341362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, L.S. 1968 Memorandum on Dermatoglyphic Nomenclature. Birth Defects Original Article Series, vol. 4(3). The March of Dimes National Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
Penrose, L. S., and Loesch, D. 1967 A Study of Dermal Ridge Width in the Second (palmar) Interdigital Area with Special Reference to Aneuploid States. Journal of Mentally Defective Research 11: 36—42.Google Scholar
Schaefer, J. 1986 Decorated Ceramics and Unfired Clay Objects. In Archaeological Investigations at Antelope House, edited by Morris, D.P., pp. 398^431. National Park Service, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Trotter, M., and Gleser, G. 1958 A Re-evaluation of Estimation of Stature Based on Measurements of Stature Taken during Life and of Long Bones after Death. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 16: 79123.Google Scholar