Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:30:28.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dating Lake Mohave Artifacts and Beaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Claude N. Warren
Affiliation:
Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho
John de Costa
Affiliation:
Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho

Abstract

It is generally accepted that Lake Mohave artifacts date from the closing phase of the last deglaciation when the lake stood at its highest level. A re-evaluation of published data shows that Lake Mohave artifacts date from the overflow period, but only after the lake had abandoned the highest or 946-foot beach. A radiocarbon date of 9640 ± 240 years has been obtained from Anodonta shells at levels between 925 and 930 feet. These shells have been interpreted as remains of animals stranded en masse during the final recession of the Pluvial lake. No evidence for such a catastrophic event has been presented, and there is some evidence which suggests the opposite. The Anodonta shells appear to represent remains of dead animals deposited when the lake stood somewhat higher than 930 feet. It is apparent that an interdisciplinary approach, involving geology, paleolimnology, and palynology, as well as archaeology, is needed if man's place in the history of Lake Mohave is to be understood.

Type
Facts and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agogino, George 1961 A New Point Type from Hell Gap Valley, Eastern Wyoming. American Antiquity, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 558–60. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Amsden, Charles A. 1937 Lake Mohave Artifacts. In “Archaeology of Pleistocene Lake Mohave: A Symposium,” Southwest Museum Papers, No. 11, pp. 51-98. Highland Park.Google Scholar
Antevs, Ernst 1937 Age of the Lake Mohave Culture. In “Archaeology of Pleistocene Lake Mohave: A Symposium,” Southwest Museum Papers, No. 11, pp. 45-9. Highland Park.Google Scholar
Antevs, Ernst 1952 Climatic History and the Antiquity of Man in California. University of California Archaeological Survey Reports, No. 16, pp. 23-31. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Bode, Francis D. 1937 Geology of Lake Mohave Outlet Channel. In “Archaeology of Pleistocene Lake Mohave: A Symposium,” Southwest Museum Papers, No. 11, pp. 109-18. Highland Park.Google Scholar
Brainerd, George W. 1953 A Re-examination of the Dating Evidence for the Lake Mohave Artifact Assemblage. American Antiquity, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 270–1. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, E. W. C. and Campbell, William H. 1937 The Lake Mohave Site. In “Archaeology of Pleistocene Lake Mohave: A Symposium,” Southwest Museum Papers, No. 11, pp. 9-43. Highland Park.Google Scholar
Hubbs, Carl L., Bien, George S., and Suess, Hans E. 1962 La Jolla Natural Radiocarbon Measurements II. American Journal of Science Radiocarbon Supplement, Vol. 4, pp. 204–38. New Haven.Google Scholar
Pennak, R. W. 1953 Fresh-water Invertebrates of the United States. The Ronald Press, New York.Google Scholar
Rogers, M. J. 1939 Early Lithic Industries of the Lower Basin of the Colorado River and Adjacent Desert Areas. San Diego Museum Papers, No. 3. San Diego.Google Scholar
Wallace, William J. 1962 Prehistoric Cultural Development in the Southern Californian Deserts, American Antiquity, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 172–80. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Warren, Claude N. and True, D. L. 1961 The San Dieguito Complex and Its Place in California Prehistory. Archaeological Survey Annual Report 1960-1961, pp. 246-338, Department of Anthropology and Sociology, University of California. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Welch, P. S. 1952 Limnology. Second edition. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
Wormington, H. M. 1957 Ancient Man in North America. Fourth edition, revised. Denver Museum of Natural History, Popular Series, No. 4. Denver.Google Scholar