Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:16:48.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contact Period Rural Overpopulation in the Basin of Mexico: Carrying-Capacity Models Tested with Documentary Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Barbara J. Williams
Barbara J. Williams*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin Center-Janesville, WI 53546
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The carrying-capacity model applied to the Basin of Mexico by Sanders et al. is tested by Contact period hieroglyphic data on population and landholding from the rural tlaxilacalli (ward) of Santa María Asunción. Two calculations are made of the theoretically maximum tlaxilacalli population, one using the Sanders et al. parameters, and the second based on Asunción data. The analysis confirms the accuracy of Sanders et al.'s maize yields and average per-capita maize-consumption rate (if a variable of seed set aside is included), but suggests revision downward of household size. Although for the wrong reasons, the Sanders model correctly predicts the range of population for Asuncion. The balance between simulated household maize consumption and production shows that carrying capacity under viable, long-term strategies had been exceeded for poor and average agricultural years in the Contact period. At the tlaxilacalli level, grain deficits of greater than — 50 percent are projected for poor years, a — 28 percent deficit to + 11 percent surplus in average years, and surpluses of 10 to 74 percent in good years. In average years, to meet the maize requirements of the recorded population, continuous cultivation rather than 1:1 fallowing must have occurred on marginal land. Rural overpopulation apparent in Asunción may have been typical of many piedmont communities. The impetus for Late Horizon expansion of agricultural settlement might have come as much from rural overpopulation as from state-directed settlement to provide subsistence for Tenochtitlan.

Résumé

Résumé

Los datos jeroglifícos sobre la población y la tenencia de la tierra de un tlaxilacalli rural aportadospor el Códice de Santa María Asunción se usan para probar un modelo aplicado por Sanders et al., el cual predice el número de habitantes que pudiera haber sido sostenido en la Cuenca de México. Se hacen dos cálculos de la máxima población teorética que pudo haber sido abastecida por las tierras de Asunción, uno usando los parámetros de Sanders et al, el otro basado en los datos del códice. El análisis confirma la exactitud de los rendimientos de maíz y la tasa promedia del consumo de maíz por persona (si se incluye la cantidad de semilla apartada para la siembra) propuestos por Sanders et al, pero sugiere una reducción del tamaño medio de unidades familiares. El modelo de Sanders et al. predice correctamente el rango de cantidad de habitantes en Asunción, pero por razones erróneas. El equilibrio entre la producción y el consumo de maíz calculados por unidades familiares muestra que en el período del Contacto bajo condiciones agrícolas pobres o normales y siguiendo estrategias agrícolas viables a largo plazo, se sobrepasó la capacidad terrestre de sostener a la gente. A nivel del tlaxilacalli, la falta de maíz llegó a — 50 tanto por ciento en los años pobres, faltó — 28 tanto por ciento o hubo excedentes a +11 tanto por ciento en los años promedios, y excedentes de 10 a 74 tanto por ciento en los años buenos. Durante años normales, para sostener a la gente registrada en el códice, debieron haber cultivado las tierras marginales cada año en vez depracticar barbecho 1:1. El excedente de población rural en Asunción quizá fuera típica de las comunidades del somontano. El empuje de la expansión de asentamiento agrícola durante el Horizonte Tardío quizá fuera tanto la consecuencia de excedente de población rural como el esfuerzo estatal de asegurar el abastecimiento de Tenochtitlan.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , October 1989 , pp. 715 - 732
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Anderson, R. K., Calvo, J., Serrano, G., and Payne, G. C. 1946 A Study of the Nutritional Status and Food Habits of Otomi Indians in the Mezquital Valley of Mexico. American Journal of Public Health 36 : 883–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonfil Batalla, G. 1962 Diagnostico sobre el hambre en Sudzal, Yucatan. Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia, Mexico, D. F. Google Scholar
Charlton, T. 1970 Contemporary Agriculture in the Teotihuacan Valley. In The Teotihuacan Valley Project, Final Report, vol. 1, pp. 253–361. Occasional Papers in Anthropology No. 3. Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F., and Borah, W. 1971 Civil Category and Age-Group Ratios in Colonial Mexico. In Essays in Population History : Mexico and the Caribbean, by Cook, S. F. and Borah, W., pp. 201–299. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F., and Borah, W. 1979 Indian Food Production and Consumption in Central Mexico Before and After the Conquest. In Essays in Population History : Mexico and California, by Cook, S. F. and Borah, W., pp. 129–176. University of California Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Paso y Troncoso, F. (editor) 1912 Codex Kingsborough : Memorial de los indios de Tepetlaoztoc al monarca espahol contra los encomenderos del Pueblo. Hauser and Menet, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
DeWalt, K. M. 1983 Nutritional Strategies and Agricultural Change in a Mexican Community. Studies in Cultural Anthropology 6, edited by Kottak, C. P.. University Microfilms International Research Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Dibble, C, and Anderson, A. J. O. 1961 Florentine Codex : General History of the Things of New Spain, Book 10. School of American Research, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Dibble, C, and Anderson, A. J. O. 1963 Florentine Codex : General History of the Things of New Spain, Book 11. School of American Research, Santa Fe.Google Scholar
FAO/WHO 1973 Energy and Protein Requirements : Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Ad Hoc Expert Committee. FAO Nutrition Meetings Report Series No. 52 and WHO Technical Report Series No. 522. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. 1964 The Aztecs Under Spanish Rule : A History of the Indians of the Valley of Mexico 1519-1810. Stanford University Press, Stanford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, H. R. 1986 Household and Family Structure in Early Colonial Tepetlaoztoc : An Analysis of the Codice de Santa Maria Asuncion. Estudios de Cultura Ndhuatl 18 : 275–294.Google Scholar
Harvey, H. R., and Williams, B. J. 1980 Aztec Arithmetic : Positional Notation and Area Calculation. Science 210 : 499–505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassig, R. 1985 Trade, Tribute, and Transportation : The Sixteenth-Century Political Economy of the Valley of Mexico. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Hicks, F. 1984 Rotational Labor and Urban Development in Prehispanic Tetzcoco. In Explorations in Ethnohistory : Indians of Central Mexico in the Sixteenth Century, edited by Harvey, H. R. and Prem, H. J., pp. 147–174. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Kovar, A. 1970 The Physical and Biological Environment of the Basin of Mexico. In The Teotihuacan Valley Project Final Report, vol. 1, pp. 1–67. Occasional Papers in Anthropology No. 3, Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
Logan, M. H., and Sanders, W. T. 1976 The Model. In The Valley of Mexico : Studies in Pre-Hispanic Ecology and Society, edited by Wolf, E. R., pp. 31–58. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
McGuire, J. S., and Torun, B. 1984 Dietary Energy Intake and Energy Expenditure of Women in Rural Guatemala. In Protein-Energy-Requirement Studies in Developing Countries : Results of International Research, edited by Rand, W. M., Uauy, R., and Scrimshaw, N. S., pp. 175–186. Food and Nutrition Bulletin Supplement 10. United Nations University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Newman, M. T. 1960 Adaptations in the Physique of American Aborigines to Nutritional Factors. Human Biology 30 : 288–313.Google Scholar
Offner, J. 1980 Archival Reports of Poor Crop Yields in the Early Postconquest Texcocan Heartland and Their Implications for Studies of Aztec Period Population. American Antiquity 45 : 848–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offner, J. 1983 Law and Politics in Aztec Texcoco. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Offner, J. 1984 Household Organization in the Texcocan Heartland : The Evidence in the Codex Vergara. In Explorations in Ethnohistory : Indians of Central Mexico in the Sixteenth Century, edited by Harvey, H. R. and Prem, H. J., pp. 127–146. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Ortiz de Montellano, B. R. 1978 Aztec Cannibalism : An Ecological Necessity? Science 200 : 611–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, J. R. 1971 Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the Texcoco Region, Mexico. Memoirs No. 3. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez Lizaur, M. 1975 Poblacion y sociedad : cuatro comunidades del Acolhuacan. Centro de Investigaciones Superiores, Instituto Nacional de Antropologia, Mexico, D. F. Google Scholar
Perrin, R., Winkelmann, D. L., Moscardi, E. R., and Anderson, J. R. 1976 From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations. Information Bulletin 27. Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo, Mexico, D. F. Google Scholar
Sanders, W. T. 1957 Tierra y Agua (Soil and Water). A Study of the Ecological Factors in the Development of Mesoamerican Civilizations. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. T. 1976 The Agricultural History of the Basin of Mexico. In The Valley of Mexico : Studies in Pre-Hispanic Ecology and Society, edited by Wolf, E. R., pp. 101–159. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. T., Parsons, J. R., and Santley, R. S. 1979 The Basin of Mexico : Ecological Processes in the Evolution of a Civilization. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Secretaria de Recursos Hidraulicos 1980 Analisis historico de las sequias. In Comision del Plan Nacional Hidrdulico. Secretaria de Recursos Hidraulicos, Mexico, D. F. Google Scholar
Williams, B. J. 1980 Pictorial Representation of Soils in the Valley of Mexico : Evidence from the Codex Vergara. Geoscience and Man 21 : 51–62.Google Scholar
Williams, B. J. 1982 Aztec Soil Glyphs and Contemporary Nahua Soil Classification. In The Indians of Mexico in pre-Columbian and Modern Times, edited by R, M. E.. Jansen, G. N. and Leyenaar, Th. J. J., pp. 206–222. Rijksmuseum voor Volkenkunde, Leiden, Holland.Google Scholar
Williams, B. J. 1984 Mexican Pictorial Cadastral Registers. In Explorations in Ethnohistory : Indians of Central Mexico in the Sixteenth Century, edited by Harvey, H. R. and Prem, H. J., pp. 103–125. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Williams, B. J., and Ortiz-Solorio, C. A. 1981 Middle American Folk Soil Taxonomy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 71 : 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. J., and Harvey, H. R. 1988 Content, Provenience, and Significance of the Codex Vergara and the Codice de Santa Maria Asuncion . American Antiquity 53 : 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar