Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:51:36.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Consideration of Some Processual Designs for Archaeology as Anthropology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gilbert Kushner
Gilbert Kushner*
Affiliation:
State University of New YorkBrockport, New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In recent years a new approach in archaeology, the "processual school," has been developed. The processualists suggest that method and theory in archaeology be in various important ways altered and reoriented. A number of the school's basic axioms are defined, illustrated, and discussed. Included is a consideration of such notions as "adaptation," "system," and "explanation." It is argued that various of the components of the processualist position themselves require some modification.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 1970 , pp. 125 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Robert McC. 1966 The Evolution of Urban Society. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert McC. 1968 Archeological Research Strategies: Past and Present. Science, Vol. 160, No. 3833, pp. 1187–92. Washington.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binford, Lewis R. 1962 Archaeology as Anthropology. American Antiquity, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 217–25. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1964 A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design. American Antiquity, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 425–41. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1965 Archaeological Systematics and the Study of Culture Process. American Antiquity, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 203–10. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1968a Post-Pleistocene Adaptations. In New Perspectives in Archeology, edited by S. R. Binford and L. R. Binford, pp. 313–41. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis R. 1968b Archeological Perspectives. In New Perspectives in Archeology, edited by S. R. Binford and L. R. Binford, pp. 5–32. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.Google Scholar
Brown, James A. 1965 The Prairie Peninsula: An Interaction Area in the Eastern United States. MS, doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
Brown, Robert 1963 Explanation in Social Science. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.Google Scholar
Buckley, Walter 1968 Society as a Complex Adaptive System. In Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist, edited by W. Buckley, pp. 490–513. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.Google Scholar
Cohen, Yehudi A. 1968 Culture as Adaptation. In Man in Adaptation: the Cultural Present, edited by Y. A. Cohen, pp. 40–60. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent 1967 Review of “An Introduction to American Archaeology, Vol. 1: North and Middle America,” by G. R. Willey. Scientific American, Vol. 217, pp. 119–22. New York.Google Scholar
Freilich, Morris 1967 Ecology and Culture: Environmental Determinism and the Ecological Approach in Anthropology. Anthropological Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 26–43. Washington.Google Scholar
Gearing, Fred 1962 Priests and Warriors. Memoir of the American Anthropological Association, No. 93. Menasha.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford 1957 Ritual and Social Change: a Javanese Example. American Anthropologist, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 32–54. Menasha.Google Scholar
Goodenouoh, Ward H. 1963 Cooperation in Change. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
Gouldner, Alvin W. 1959 Reciprocity and Autonomy in Functional Theory. In Symposium on Sociological Theory, edited by L. Gross, pp. 241–70. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Helm, June 1962 The Ecological Approach in Anthropology. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 67, No. 6, pp. 630–9. Chicago.Google Scholar
Honigmann, John J. 1959 The World of Man. Harper and Brothers, New York.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David 1965 The Superorganic: Science or Metaphysics? American Anthropologist, Vol. 67, No. 4, pp. 958–75. Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kluckhohn, Clyde 1962 The Limitations of Adaptation and Adjustment as Concepts for Understanding Cultural Behavior. In Culture and Behavior, edited by R. Kluckhohn, pp. 255–64. The-Free Press of Glencoe, New York.Google Scholar
Lee, Dorothy 1959 Are Basic Needs Ultimate? In Freedom and Culture, pp. 70–7. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Longacre, William A. 1968 Some Aspects of Prehistoric Society in East-Central Arizona. In New Perspectives in Archeology, edited by S. R. Binford and L. R. Binford, pp. 89–102. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.Google Scholar
Nadel, S. F. 1951 The Foundations of Social Anthropology. The Free Press, Glencoe.Google Scholar
Opler, Morris E. 1964 The Human Being in Culture Theory. American Anthropologist, Vol. 66, No. 3, Pt. 1, pp. 507–28. Menasha.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall D. 1964 Culture and Environment: the Study of Cultural Ecology. In Horizons in Anthropology, edited by S. Tax, pp. 123–47. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.Google Scholar
Steward, Julian H. 1955 Theory of Culture Change. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Struever, Stuart 1968 Woodland Subsistence-Settlement Systems in the Lower Illinois Valley. In New Perspectives in Archeology, edited by S. R. Binford and L. R. Binford, pp. 285–312. Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago.Google Scholar
Vayda, Andrew P. and Rappaport, Roy A. 1968 Ecology, Cultural and Noncultural. In Introduction to Cultural Anthropology, edited by J. A. Clifton, pp. 477–97. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.Google Scholar
Wilson, Godfrey and Wilson, Monica 1954 The Analysis of Social Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar