Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:19:21.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on Dempsey and Baumhoff's “The Statistical Use of Artifact Distributions to Establish Chronological Sequence”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William D. Lipe
William D. Lipe*
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Because of its dependence on presence-and-absence counts, the Dempsey-Baumhoff ordering technique may not be as useful as the Robinson technique in two kinds of situations: (1) when artifact mixture has occurred, and (2) when the types used are based on continuously varying attributes and overlap one another to some extent because of normal variation in the attributes.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , July 1964 , pp. 103 - 104
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brainerd, G. W. 1951 The Place of Chronological Ordering in Archaeological Analysis. American Antiquity, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 301–13. Salt Lake City.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgh, R. F. 1959 Ceramic Profiles in the Western Mound at Awatovi, Northeastern Arizona. American Antiquity, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 184–202. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Dempsey, P. and Baumhoff, M. 1963 The Statistical Use of Artifact Distributions to Establish Chronological Sequence. American Antiquity, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 496–509. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Vera M. 1951 Chronology at South Indian Field, Florida. Yale University Publications in Anthropology, No. 45. New Haven.Google Scholar
Phillips, P., Ford, J. A., and Griffin, J. B. 1951 Archaeological Survey in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, 1940-1947. Papers of the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University, Vol. 25. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. 1951 A Method for Chronologically Ordering Archaeological Deposits. American Antiquity, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 293–301. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Spaulding, A. C. 1960 Statistical Description and Comparison of Artifact Assemblages. In “The Application of Quantitative Methods in Archaeology,” edited by Heizer, R. F. and Cook, S. F., pp. 60–83. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, No. 28. New York.Google Scholar